Formas de estados tradicionales y su especificidad histórica.

  • Valentin Ya. Liubashits Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Faculty of Law, Southern Federal University
  • Nikolai V. Razuvaev Department of Civil and Labor Law, North-Western Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Alexey Yu. Mamychev Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service; Far Eastern Federal University
  • Volodymyr A. Trofymenko Philosophy Department, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine, Kharkiv.
  • Vadim O. Danilyan. Sociology Department Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Address: 61050, 7 Feuerbach Square, Kharkiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-9887
Palabras clave: poder, estado, diarquía, monarquía, ley

Resumen

El artículo aborda las formas de los estados tradicionales en el contexto de su origen histórico y evolución, confirmándose que en el orden legal tradicional, la propiedad de la tierra genera poder político distribuido entre varios sujetos, uno de los cuales representa a la comunidad y el otro, el estado mismo. Los autores muestran que este último no ha sido cubierto adecuadamente en la historia de la política. Se confirma, que en la era de los estados tradicionales, la diarquía era una forma típica de organización estatal, cuya esencia era la división de las prerrogativas del poder entre el gobernante supremo, que concentraba las funciones sacerdotales y el "vice-rey", ejerciendo todo el poder militar y administrativo.

Citas

Arist. Ath. Pol., I, 3, 2—3: Aristotle. The Athenian Constitution; The Eudemonian Ethics; On Virtutes and Vices. Cambridge, 1938. P. 14.

Aristotle. Politics // Works: in 4 volumes. M.: Mysl, 1983. V.4. P. 375-644.

Bokshchanin A.A. Essay on the history of state institutions of the Chinese Empire // Phenomenon of Eastern Despotism. Governmental structure and power. M.: Nauka, 1993. p. 273-333

Bondarenko D.M. Chiefdom in Precolonial Benin // Early forms of political organization / Ed. V.A. Popov. M.: Nauka, 1996. p. 140-142

Bradbary R. E. The Benin Kingdom and the Edo-Speaking Peoples of South-Western Nigeria. London, 1951. P. 33.

Buzeskul V.P. The history of Athenian democracy. St.P., 2003. p. 35.

Chedwick Y. The Mycenaean World. Cambridge, 1976. P. 71.

Chirkin V.E. A modern state. M., 2001. p. 135-137.

Cicero. About the state // Cicero. About the state. About the laws. About old age. About friendship. About duties. Speech. Letters. M., 1999. p. 65.

Claessen H. Y. M. The Early State: A Structural Approach // The Early State. The Haague. Paris, New York, 1978.

Davydov Iu.N. Weber's sociology of history // Weber M. Agrarian history of the Ancient World. M., 2001. p. 26-28.

Effentere H. von. Un lawagetas oublie // Atti e memorie del I Congresso intemationale di Micenologia. Roma, 1967. P. 60

Egharevba Y. U. Benin Lawland Custom. Port Harcourt, 1949. P. 79.

Egorov A.B. Roman state and law. The royal period and the era of the Republic. St.P., 2006. p. 38.

Eliade M. Aspects of myth. M., 1995. p. 48 et seq.

Elizarov M.V. The state as an institutional form of organization of social and legal space // Bulletin of Bashkir University. 2009. V. 14. No. 2. P. 617-619.

Elnitskii L.A. New epigraphic data (Tabula Banasitana) and Edict of Caracalla on Roman citizenship // WDI. 1980. № 1. P. 162-171.

Gjerstad E. Innerpolitische und militärische Organisation in frührömischen Zeit // Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt. Bd. I. Teil 1. Berlin; New York, 1972. S. 143—145.

Gumplovich L. The general doctrine about the state. St.P., 1910. P. 221.

Hegel G.V.F. Philosophy of law. M., 1990. p. 311-312.

History of state and law of foreign countries. Part I / Ed. O.A. Zhidkov and N.A. Krasheninnikova. M., 1998. p. 14-15.

History of the Ancient East. The origin of the most ancient class societies and the first centers of the working-class civilization. Part one. Mesopotamia / Ed. I.M. Diakonov. M., 1983. p. 168-170.

History of the Ancient World. Early antiquity / Ed. I.M. Diakonov, V.D. Neronova, I.S. Sventsitskaia. M., 1982. p. 18-50.

History of the East. In 6 volumes. V. 2. East in Middle Ages / Ed. L.B. Alaev and K.Z. Ashrafian. M., 2002. p. 339.

Idem. A short History of Benin. Ibadan. 1960. P. 4.

Idem. La religion des Turc et des Mongols. Paris, 1984. P. 158—161.

Kant I. To the eternal world. Philosophical project // Kant I. Works. In 8 volumes. M., 1994. V. 7. p. 16.

Kofanov L.L. Lex and ius: the emergence and development of Roman law in the VIII-VI centuries BC. M., 2008. p. 195.

Kofanov L.L. The nature of royal power in Rome in VIII - VI centuries BC. // Antiquity and medieval studies. Collection of scientific works. Issue 3 / Chief Ed. V.V. Dementieva. Yaroslavl, 2001. p. 14-24.

Kradin N.N. Chiefdom: the present state of affairs and problems of study // Early forms of political organization: from originality to statehood / Chief Ed. V.A. Popov. M., 1995. p. 47.

Kulkov M.O. The mechanism and form of the state: questions of the relationship of concepts // Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Ser. 5. Jurisprudence. 2005. No. 7. p. 124-128.

Lejeune M. Le damos dans la societe mycennienne // Revue des Etudes Greques. 1965, 78. P. 4.

Lindgren M. The People of Pylos. Uppsala, 1973. P. 151.

Locke J. Two treatises on the reign // Locke J. Works. In 3 volumes. M., 1988. p. 337-338.

Lyubashits V.Ia., Mordovtsev A.Iu., Mamychev A.Iu. Theory of state and law. M: RIOR: INFRA-M, 2015

Valentin Ya. Lyubashits, Nikolay V. Razuvaev, Alexey Yu. Mamychev, Andrey Yu. Mordovtsev, Magomedov R.M. State as Evolving Phenomenon: Key Problems and Approaches //Amazonia Investiga. 2018. Vol. 7. Núm. 15: 32- 41/ Julio-Agosto.

N. Machiavelli. Discourses on the first decade of Titus Livius // N. Machiavelli. A sovereign ruler. Discourses on the first decade of Titus Livius. About military art. M., 1997. p. 118-119.

Maretina S.A. The community of the mountain peoples of Assam // Community and social organization among the peoples of East and Southeast Asia / Chief Ed. R.F. Its. L., 1967. p. 20- 25.

Maretina S.A. The evolution of the social system among the mountain peoples of Northeast India. M., 1980. p. 174-180.

Marinovich L.P., Koshelenko G.P. Pausanias: Life and Work // Pausanias. Description of Hellas. In 2 volumes. M., 1994. V. I. p. III-VI.

Marx K. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte // Marx K. Engels F. Works. V. 8. P. 119-217.

Mashkin N.A. Augustus’ Principate. Origin and social essence. M.; L., 1949.

Mommsen T. History of Rome. In 4 volumes. Rostov-on-Don, 1997. V. 3. p. 412-420.

Montesquieu Sh.L., On the spirit of laws // Montesquieu Sh.L., Selected Works. M., 1955. p. 169.

Muller A. History of Islam: From Muslim Persia to the fall of Muslim Spain. M., 2004. p. 706- 710.

Nemirovskii A.I. Ancient history: Antiquity. 2nd ed., revised and extended. M., 2007. p. 880- 881.

O.E. Nepomnin. Transformation of the Chinese state in the first half of the XX century. // The phenomenon of oriental despotism: the structure of governance and power / Ed. O.N. Ivanov. M., 1993. p. 334-361.

Nersesiants V.S. Philosophy of law. 2nd ed., revised and extended. M.: Norma, 2006. 835 p.

Nilsson M. Homer and Mycenae. London, 1933. P. 220

Paprygin E.S. The rule of law in states with different forms of political and legal regime. Author's abstract, Ph.D. Law. M., 2009.

Paskov S.S. Japan in the Early Middle Ages, VII-XII centuries. M., 1987.

Poliakov A.V. The general theory of law: problems of interpretation in the context of a communicative approach. St.P.: Publishing house of St.-Petersburg State University, 2004. 863 p.

Poliakova G.F. Greek societies of the 2nd millennium BC // Ancient Greece: problems of the development of the policy. V.1: The formation and development of the polis. M.: Nauka, 1983. p. 62-70.

Polybius. General history. M., 2004. V. I. p. 443.

Radzig S.I. Cicero and his time // Cicero. 2,000 years since death. M. 1959. p. 9-54.

Razuvaev N.V. Elements of the dualism of royal power in Early Rome // History of State and Law. 2011. No. 7. P. 9-14.

Romanov V.N. Historical development of culture. Problems of typology. M., 1991. p. 92-97.

Romanov V.N. The Ancient Indian ideas of the tsar and the kingdom // VDI. 1978, No. 4.

Rousseau. J.J. On the general contract, or the principles of political law // Rousseau J.J. Treatises. M., 1969. p. 138.

Roux J.-P. L’origine celeste de la souverainte dans les inscriptions paleolitiques de Mongolie et de Siberie // The Sacral Kingschip. Leiden, 1959. P. 237—239.

Schutz A. Equality and the meaning structure of the social world. A. Schutz, Selected works: A World Glowing with Meaning. M., 2004. p. 625.

Sidahome Y. E. Stories of the Benin Empire. London; Ibadan, 1964. P. 49—50, 64—72, 163.

Smirnov A.Iu. Napoleon III Empire: from the beginnings to modern Bonapartism. M., 2003.

Spinoza B. Political treatise // Spinoza B. Treatises. M., 1998. p. 271-279.

Spiridonov L.I. The general theory of state and law, M., 2001. p. 49.

The general theory of state and law. Academic course. In 3 volumes. / Ed. M.N. Marchenko. 3rd ed., revised and extended. V. 1. State. M., 2007.

Tumans H. opere citato. p. 134-135.

Utchenko S.L. Caesar. Cicero and his time. M., 1998. p. 286.

Vasiliev L.S. General history. V.1. Ancient East and antiquity. M.: Vysshaia shkola, 2007. 287 p.

Vasilkov Ia.V. The agricultural myth in the ancient Indian epos (The Legend of Rishyaring) // Literature and culture of ancient and medieval India. M., 1979. P. 112.

Volkov A.K. The idea of Caesarism and the practice of its implementation in the period of the Second Empire in France // Roman private and public law: centuries-old experience in the development of European law. Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Roman Law, Moscow – Ivanovo (Suzdal), June 25–30, 2006. Ivanovo, 2006. p. 94–97.

Weber M. Agrarian history of the Ancient World. M.: KANON-press-C: Kuchkovo pole, 2001. p. 171-202.

Wissowa G. Augures // Pauli-Wissowa Realencyclopedia der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Heft 2. Stuttgart, 1894. S. 2232.

Publicado
2019-11-01