Mecanismos innovadores de la interacción intersectorial entre empresas y autoridades públicas en condiciones de transformación de la sociedad de la información.

Sergiy Kvitka; Eugeniy Borodin; Viktor Koval; Volodymyr Yemelyanov; Lіudmyla Ivashova.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v30i1.1060

Sergiy Kvitka
Eugeniy Borodin
Viktor Koval Odessa Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine.
Volodymyr Yemelyanov Institute of Public Administration of the Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Ukraine.
Lіudmyla Ivashova. University of customs and finance, Ukraine.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v30i1.1060

Palabras clave: prospectiva, sociedad de la información, interacción intersectorial, gobierno, empresa

Resumen

El artículo tiene como objetivo identificar formas de implementación de la tecnología prospectiva como mecanismo innovador, la cual puede brindar cooperación entre las empresas y las autoridades públicas en condiciones de una sociedad digital. La metodología de la investigación es el paradigma sinérgico para el estudio de los procesos de interacción en los campos de la administración económica y pública en condiciones de transición de la sociedad de la información a la digital. La originalidad científica del artículo radica en las posibilidades del uso prospectivo a nivel regional y local en condiciones de transformación de la sociedad de la información. Su importancia práctica es que se han identificado mecanismos y métodos específicos para la implementación de proyectos de prospectiva, que pueden utilizarse a nivel regional.

Citas

Cuosa, T. (2011). Practicing strategic foresight in government. The cases of Finland, Singapore and European Union. Singapore: S.Rajaratnam Studies.

Dnipropetrovsk Region Council. (2019). Retrieved from https://oblrada.dp.gov.ua/documents/projects-decisions/proeki-rishen/pro-regional-program-informatiz.

E-Government Development Index (2018). UN E-Government Survey 2018. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018.

E-Participation Index (2018). E-Participation Index 2018. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/ egovkb/en-us/About/Overview/E-Participation-Index.

Electronic Dnipropetrovsk region 2020-2022. (2019). Retrieved from https://rpi2020-22.dp.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/70/dridu/result%20ex.pdf.

Gainutdinova, L. (2018). Global government and civil society. Public Administration Aspects, 6(3), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.15421/15201815.

Gokhberg, L. (2013). Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation on the Crossroad to Foresight. In D. Meissner, L. Gokhberg, A. Sokolov (Ed.), Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future – Potentials and Limits of Foresight Studies (pp.257-288). Heidelberg. New York. Dordrecht. London: Springer.

Habegger, B. (2010). Strategic forеsight in public policy: reviewing the experiences of the UK, Singapore and the Netherlands. Futures. 42, 49-58.

ICT development index. (2017). Measuring the Information Society Report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Statistics.

Koval, V., & Pukała, R. (2017). Implementation of regulatory policy in economic activity: development of the institute regulatory impact assessment. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 1(1), 24-32.

Koval, V., Duginets, G., Plekhanova, O., Antonov, A., & Petrova, M. (2019). On the supranational and national level of global value chain management. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1922-1937.

Kravchenko, T. (2015). Expediency of the use of foresight methods in the development of Unified complex strategy of agriculture and rural area development for the years 2015- 2020. Public Administration Aspects, 3(4), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.15421/151541.

Kryvoshein, V. (2017). Delphi as the basic foresight technology of the science of socio- political risks. Grani, 20(7), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.15421/171796.

Kvitka, S. (2018). Foresight in Public Administration: Methods and Perspectives of Implementation in Ukraine. Public Administration Aspects, 6(8), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.15421/151847.

Kvitka, S., Starushenko, G., Koval, V., Deforzh, H., & Prokopenko, O. (2019). Marketing of Ukrainian higher educational institutions representation based on modeling of Webometrics Ranking. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 60-72.

Miles, I., & Popper, R. (Eds.).(2008) The Handbook of Technology Foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Popper, R., Keenan, M., Miles, I., Butter, M., & Sainz, G. (2007) Global Mapping Report 2007, European Foresight Monitoring Network report to the EC.

Prystupa L., Koval, V, Kvach, I., & Hrymalyuk, A. (2019). Transformation of cycles of state regulation in international trade. AEBMR-Advances in Economics Business and Management Research. Atlantis Press: France. 95, 277-280.

Samuel, S., Krumm, R. & Weiss S. (2018) Foresigth Ukraine. Four scenarios for Ukraine's development. Friedrich Ebert, Vienna.

Sukhorolskyi, P., & Sukhorolska, I. (2018). Futures studies: main stages of development and tasks in the modern world. Grani, 21(3), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.15421/10.15421/171847.

Tsedik, М. (2016). Perspectives of regional foresight implementation in the system of public administration of Ukraine. Public Administration Aspects, 4(3), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.15421/151611.

Wells, H.G. (1932). Wanted: Professors of Foresight. Slaughter, R. (ed) Studying the Future, Australian Bicentennial Authority/Commission For the Future, Melbourne, 1989. pp 3-4.

Zgurovsky, M.Z. (Ed). (2015) Foresight of the Ukrainian economy: medium-term (2015-2020) and long-term (2020-2030) time horizons (version for discussion). International Council on Science (ICSU). Kyiv: NTUU "KPI".