El descubrimiento de problemas de liderazgo para crear un ambiente amigable para la Educación a Distancia.
Resumen
Este estudio busca desarrollar la importancia de la educación a distancia y ayuda a mejorar las diferentes habilidades de liderazgo a través de la educación a distancia. El documento utiliza teorías de liderazgo para estudiar la capacidad de crear un espacio amigable para fomentar la educación a distancia en la sociedad. Para este propósito, se tomó una muestra de 392 estudiantes que estudian a través del modelo de aprendizaje de educación a distancia, con edades entre 18 y 25 años, para la identificación de sus habilidades relevantes. Se examinaron los detalles de la educación a distancia para cada grupo de edad. Los resultados refutan los estereotipos sobre la educación a distancia que causa aislamiento, problemas en la comunicación adecuada y la desconexión grupal. Se ha encontrado que la educación a distancia ayuda en la evaluación y las implicaciones de la afiliación grupal y la autoexpresión en las actividades académicas. Por lo tanto, se puede concluir que la estructura de la educación a distancia ayuda en el desarrollo de habilidades de liderazgo en personas involucradas en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje a través del modelo de educación a distancia.
Citas
Becker, J., Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2002). Discrepancies in self/subordinates’ perceptions of leadership behavior: Leader’s gender, organizational context, and leader’s self-monitoring. Group & Organization Management, 27(2), 226-244.
Benjamin, L., & Flynn, F. J. (2006). Leadership style and regulatory mode: Value from fit?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 216-230.
Bennet, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harve, J. (2003). Distributed Leadership: Full report. National College for School Leadership. Spring, 57.
Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118-126.
Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. The World Bank.
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African journal of education, 27(3), 391-406.
Bush, T. (2010). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. 4th Edition. Sage Publications Ltd.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2004). Leadership Development: Evidence and Beliefs. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Chakraborty, D., & Chakraborty, S.K. (2004) Leadership and Motivation. Rupa Publications, 133.
Crawford, M. (2012). Solo and distributed leadership: Definitions and dilemmas. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 610-620.
Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 581-613.
Dewan, S., & Dewan, D. (2010). distance education teacher as a leader: Learning from the Path Goal Leadership Theory. MERLOT journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 673-685.
Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Springer.
Edward, P. (2004). The best Leadership style: It all depends. https://www.cio.com/article/2448842/the-best-leadership-style--it-all-depends-.html
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 128(2), 203.
Farkas, C. M., & Wetlaufer, S. (1996). The way chief executive officers lead. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 110-122.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 30-44.
Hank, C. (2010). Situational Leadership: 4 leadership styles. Auburn University technical assistance centre. http://virtual.auburnworks.org/profiles/blogs/situational-leadership-4
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229-244.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 765.
Kaplan, R. E., & Kaiser, R. B. (2003). Developing versatile leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 19-26.
Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. Readings in social psychology, 3(1), 197-211.
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., Michlin, M., & Mascall, B. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement/University of Minnesota and Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto, 42, 50.
Mendels, P., & Mitgang, L. D. (2013). Creating strong principals. Educational Leadership, 70(7), 22-29.
Mitgang, L. (2012). The Making of the Principal: Five Lessons in Leadership Training. Perspective. Wallace Foundation.
Morrison, K. (2010). Complexity theory, school leadership and management: Questions for theory and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(3), 374-393.
Oduro, G., Dachi, H., Fertig, M., & Rarieya, J. (2007, September). Examining educational leadership and quality in developing countries. In 9th UKFIET International Conference on Education and Development, Oxford, OX, United Kingdom.
O’Connell, M. S., Doverspike, D., & Cober, A. B. (2002). Leadership and semiautonomous work team performance: A field study. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 50-65.
Plas, J. M., & Lewis, S. E. (2000). Person-centered leadership for nonprofit organizations: Management that works in high pressure systems. Sage Publications.
Podsakoff, P. M., Bommer, W. H., Podsakoff, N. P., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 113-142.
Razik, T. A & Swanson, A.D. (2010). Fundamental Concepts of Educational Leadership and Management. 4th edition. Allyn & Bacon.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Pina e Cunha, M., Correia, A., & Saur‐Amaral, I. (2007). Leader Self‐ reported emotional intelligence and perceived employee creativity: an exploratory study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 250-264.
Reisman, S., Dear, R. G., & Edge, D. (2001). Evolution of Web-based distance education strategies. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(5), 245-251.
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington: The University of Auckland and New Zealand Ministry of Education.
Rosete, D., & Ciarrochi, J. (2005). Emotional intelligence and its relationship to workplace performance outcomes of leadership effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(5), 388-399.
Silverthorne, C. (2001). Leadership effectiveness and personality: A cross cultural evaluation. Personality and individual differences, 30(2), 303-309.
Waters, T. & Marzano, R. (2006). School district leadership that works: The effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement. A Working Paper. Denver, CO: McREL (Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
