Problemas de calificación de delitos únicos complejos.

Rustam Z. Abdulgaziev; Viktor N. Mamichev; Dmitry I. Sostin; Anastasiya N. Sukhorukova; Magomed R. Alsultanov.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v31i1.1113

Rustam Z. Abdulgaziev Department of Criminal Law and Procedure of the Law Institute of the North Caucasus Federal University; Department of Criminal Law Disciplines of the Stavropol branch of MIREA Russian Technological University
Viktor N. Mamichev Department of Criminal Law Disciplines of the Stavropol branch of MIREA Russian Technological University
Dmitry I. Sostin Department of Criminal Law Disciplines of the Stavropol branch of MIREA Russian Technological University.
Anastasiya N. Sukhorukova Department of Criminal Law Disciplines, Stavropol Branch of MIREA Russian Technological University
Magomed R. Alsultanov. Department of Criminal Law Disciplines, Stavropol Branch of MIREA Russian Technological University.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v31i1.1113

Palabras clave: crimen compuesto, conjunto de delitos, calificación, crimen complejo

Resumen

El trabajo proporciona un análisis jurídico penal sistemático de un delito único complejo basado en el derecho penal interno actual y la práctica de su aplicación. Se da una breve descripción de cada tipo de delito único complejo. Se analizan crímenes compuestos; delitos basados en acciones alternativas; delitos con dos actos; crímenes en curso; delitos continuos y delitos de actos repetidos. Las bases de la diferenciación de un solo delito y su diferenciación de una pluralidad de actos criminales se generalizan e investigan. Se llega a una conclusión general sobre qué delitos deben atribuirse a delitos únicos complejos, así como también cómo la ley interpreta el delito único y la totalidad de los delitos.

Citas

Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with article-by-article materials and judicial practice / under the general ed. S.I. Nikulin. Moscow: Publ. Manager and Yurait, 2001. 1184 p.

Dosaeva G.S. (2016) Complicated act as a sign of the objective side of a crime: some questions of theory and practice // Legal Bulletin of the DSU. T. 20. 2016. No. 4. P. 138-140.

Dosayeva G.S. (2016) Slozhnoye deyaniye kak priznak ob"yektivnoy storony prestupleniya: nekotoryye voprosy teorii i praktiki // Yuridicheskiy vestnik DGU. T. 20. 2016. № 4. S. 138-140.

Garbatovich D.A., Sumskiy D.V. (2015) Otgranicheniye sovokupnosti prestupleniy ot yedinichnykh slozhnykh prestupleniy // Ugolovnoye pravo. 2015. № 1. S. 28-34.

Garbatovich D.A., Sumsky D.V. (2015) Differentiation of the totality of crimes from single complex crimes // Criminal law. 2015. No. 1. S. 28-34.

Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii s postateynymi materialami i sudebnoy praktikoy / pod obshchey red. S.I. Nikulina. - Moskva: Izd. Menedzher i Yurayt, 2001. – 1184 s.

Krivolapov G.G. (1989) Mnozhestvennost' prestupleniy po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu i ustanovleniye yeye priznakov organami vnutrennikh del: uchebnoye posobiye. Moskva, 1989. – 48 s.

Krivolapov G.G. (1989) The multiplicity of crimes under Soviet criminal law and the establishment of its signs by the internal affairs bodies: a training manual. - Moscow, 1989. 48 p.

Naumov A.V. (1996) Rossiyskoye ugolovnoye pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Kurs lektsiy. Moskva: BEK, 1996. 560 s.

Naumov A.V. (1996) Russian criminal law. A common part. Lecture course. Moscow: BEK, 1996. 560 p.

Robinson P.H. (2010) The Modern Irrationalities of American Criminal Codes: An Empirical Study of Offense Grading // The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2010. Vol. 100. Pg. 709, 2010 U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-04.

Robinson P.KH. (2010) Sovremennyye irratsional'nosti amerikanskikh ugolovnykh kodeksov: empiricheskoye issledovaniye klassifikatsii prestupleniy // Zhurnal ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. 2010. Tom. 100. Str. 709, 2010 U of Penn Law School, Publichno-pravovoy issledovatel'skiy dokument № 10-04.

Schwartz L.B. (1962) The American Penal System: Spirit and Technique // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1962. Vol. 339.

Shvarts L.B. (1962) Amerikanskaya penitentsiarnaya sistema: dukh i tekhnika // Annaly Amerikanskoy akademii politicheskikh i sotsial'nykh nauk. 1962. Tom. 339.

Tarasova Yu. E. (2018) The evolution of views on the concept of the multiplicity of crimes in the Russian criminal law science // Actual problems of Russian law. 2018. No. 7 (92). P. 178-185.

Tarasova YU.Ye. (2018) Evolyutsiya vzglyadov na ponyatiye mnozhestvennosti prestupleniy v rossiyskoy ugolovno-pravovoy nauke // Aktual'nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2018. № 7 (92). S. 178-185.

Tret'yakov K.V. (2015) Konkurentsiya norm ili sovokupnost' prestupleniy: problemy teorii i praktiki // Gumanitarnyye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye i obshchestvennyye nauki. 2015. № 3-1. S. 261-263.

Tretyakov K.V. (2015) Competition of norms or a combination of crimes: problems of theory and practice // Humanitarian, socio-economic and social sciences. 2015. No. 3-1. P. 261-263.

Vinokhod K.V. (2018) Nekotoryye voprosy otgranicheniya sovokupnosti prestupleniy ot yedinichnykh slozhnykh prestupleniy // Studencheskiy vestnik. № 9-1 (29). S. 62-65.

Volzhenkin B.V. (1998) Printsip spravedlivosti i problemy mnozhestvennosti prestupleniy po UK RF // Zakonnost'. 1998. № 12. S. 2-7.

Volzhenkin B.V. (1998) The principle of justice and the problem of the multiplicity of crimes under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation // Legality. 1998. No. 12. S. 2-7.

Vozhannikova I.G. (2014) Relapse as a type of multiplicity of crimes: monograph / ed. ed. A.I. Chuchaev. Moscow: CONTRACT, 2014. 112 p.

Vozzhannikova I.G. (2014) Retsidiv kak vid mnozhestvennosti prestupleniy: monografiya / otv. red. A.I. Chuchayev. Moskva: KONTRAKT, 2014. 112 s.

Winocher K.V. (2018) Some questions of delimiting the totality of crimes from single complex crimes // Student Herald. 2018. No. 9-1 (29). Р. 62-65.