Sinergia de las tecnologías innovadoras con el Enfoque Integrado del Aprendizaje de Contenidos y Lenguaje en la Educación Terciaria.
Resumen
El concepto de Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenido y Lenguaje (CLIL) ha atraído la atención de los expertos. Se argumenta que el enfoque CLIL ayuda a aumentar el conocimiento profesional basado. Al mismo tiempo, la educación en idiomas ha experimentado una implementación ubicua de las tecnologías modernas. Un experimento educativo reportado en este artículo fue provocado por esas tendencias. El experimento se realizó para evaluar el potencial de aprendizaje con el curso electrónico CLIL y estaba destinado a mejorar la calidad de la formación lingüística en el entorno educativo digital contemporáneo. El enfoque metodológico adoptado es una metodología mixta basada en experimentos pedagógicos, estadísticas matemáticas e instrumentos de evaluación. Los resultados confirman los beneficios de aplicar el enfoque CLIL a través de recursos digitales en la educación terciaria.
Citas
Bozdoğan, D. (2013). Technology-enhanced CLIL classrooms. In Pokrivčáková, S. et al. CLIL in Foreign Language Education: E-textbook for foreign language teachers (pp. 164-176). Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University.
De Santo, M., De Meo, A. (2016). E-training for the CLIL teacher: E-tutoring and cooperation in a Moodle-based community of learning. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(3), 41-49.
Federal Service of Monitoring in Education and Science (2016). Analytical materials “National Research of Secondary Education Quality in 5 and 8 Grades on the Subject “English Language”. URL: http://www.ivege.ru/uploads/files/center/niko/English.pdf. Accessed: 19.09.2019.
Howard, N., Wan, Ng. (2009). Ubiquitous learning and handhelds. In Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, Second Edition (pp. 2171-2176). IGI Global.
Hurajová L. (2013). Tertiary CLIL. In Pokrivčáková, S. et al. CLIL in Foreign Language Education: E-textbook for foreign language teachers (pp. 85-99). Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University.
Kargina, E.M. (2014). Relevance of training in practical use of a foreign language in the sphere of professional communication. Modern Research and Innovations, 6(3). URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2014/06/35757.
Khalyapina, L.P. (2017). Current trends in teaching foreign languages on the basis of CLIL. Teaching Methodology in Higher Education, 6(20), 56-52. DOI: 10.18720/HUM/ISSN 2227-8591.20.5.
Korzh, T.N. (2017). Principles of language for special purposes (LSP) teaching within the framework of cognitive and communicative approach. Teaching Methodology in Higher Education, 6(20), 37-45. DOI: 10.18720/HUM/ISSN 2227-8591.20.4.
Kovaleva, Yu.Yu. (2016). From the experience of realization of the electronic module education in the foreign language of the students of the technical university. In Mozhaeva G.V., Arenkina E.A., Babanskaya O.M. (Eds.) Best eLearning Practices: Materials of the II methodical conference (pp. 58-63). Tomsk: Publishing House of Tomsk University.
Lasagabaster, D. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 3-18. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2010.519030.
Nazarenko, A.L. (2015). Information technologies in education: The synthesis of traditional format and e-learning (an experience of developing a new model of a lecture course). Оpen education, 2, 70-74. [in Rus.].
Yang W. (2016). ESP vs. CLIL: A coin of two sides or a continuum of two extremes? ESP Today. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 4(1), 43-68.
