Una evaluación de la efectividad de los currículos en inglés: alineando los currículos con las necesidades industriales.

  • Arslan Arshad
  • Sikander Ali. Department of English Language & Literature, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Palabras clave: cursos de inglés, currículum, universidades gubernamentales y privadas, necesidades industriales, remedios

Resumen

Este estudio investiga la efectividad de los currículos actuales de cursos de inglés aprobados por HEC para diferentes programas de posgrado que se ofrecen en universidades públicas y privadas, y explica su potencia con algunos remedios. El estudio involucra un método mixto para finalizar los resultados mediante un cuestionario diseñado a través de la adaptación de las diez preguntas de Harden para el enfoque de desarrollo curricular. Los datos de los 200 estudiantes de posgrado de universidades gubernamentales y universidades privadas de Pakistán han estado involucrados. SPSS 2.3 se ha utilizado para realizar el análisis cuantitativo. Los resultados aceptan la hipótesis de que el plan de estudios actual de los cursos de inglés no ayuda efectivamente a los estudiantes a mejorar su idioma inglés.

Citas

Ahmed, Y. A., and Alneel, S. (2017). Analyzing the curriculum of the faculty of medicine, University of Gezira using Harden’s 10 questions framework. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism.

Darweesh, A. D. (2014). The Importance of Teaching Listening Comprehension at the University Level. Acme Intellects International Journal of Research in Management, Social Sciences & Technology.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current Developments in Second Language Reading Research. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (3), 375-406.

Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. Harlow: Longman.

Levine, A., Ferenz, O. &Reves, T. (2000). EFL Academic Reading and Modern Technology: How Can We Turn Our Students into Independent Critical Readers?The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 4 (4).

McKay, S. L. (1992). Teaching English overseas: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Nation, P. (1991). "Managing Group Discussion: Problem-Solving Tasks". Guidelines. V13, n.1,

Nunan, D. (1993). The learner-centered curriculum (6th Ed.) Cambridge University Press.

O' Brein, N. (1996). Partnership In Learning: A Task Based Advanced Speaking Course. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Chicago.

Predrag M., Pere T., Marton S. and Veselin P. (2014). Curriculum development process redesign based on university-industry cooperation.

Racio, S. A. (2012). The importance of teaching listening and speaking skills. Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura, Facultad de Educación.

Ronis, D. L. (2008). Problem based learning for math and science: Integrating inquiry and the internet. London: Corwin Press.

Saylor, G., Alexander, W. and Lewis, A. (1961). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning. USA: Rinehart and Winston.

Shewakena, B. and Belay, S. (2017). The Role of University-Industry Linkage to Produce Graduates with Employable Skills: Analysis of Banking and Finance Graduates’ Attributes from Educators and Industries Perspective. International Journal of African and Asian Studies.

Tan, E.K., & Miller, J. (2008). Writing in English in Malaysian High Schools: The Discourse of Examinations, England: Routledge.

Tileston, D. W. (2004). What every teacher should know about instructional planning. New York: Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks.

UNESCO. (1993). International workshop on curriculum development in technical and vocational education: Final report. www.unesco.org/education/pdf/23_85.pdf

Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210.

Willingham, D.T. (2006). How Knowledge Helps. American Educator, Spring, 30-37.

World Bank. (2013). Promoting university-industry collaboration in developing countries: policy brief: http://innovationpolicyplatform.org

Publicado
2019-11-01