El Instituto político del estado en el contexto del análisis histórico y tipológico.

Valentin Ya. Lyubashits; Nikolay V. Razuvaev; Irina E. Abramova; Natalya V. Fedorova; Benedyk Y. S.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v26i1.1495

Valentin Ya. Lyubashits department of the Theory and History of State and Law.
Nikolay V. Razuvaev department of the Civil and Labor Law, Northwest institute of management of the Russian academy of national economy and public service.
Irina E. Abramova department of History Rostov State Medical University.
Natalya V. Fedorova Don State Technical University
Benedyk Y. S. Department of International Law, Yaroslav Mudry National Law University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v26i1.1495

Palabras clave: Análisis tipológico, estructuras protestantes, historicismo, paradigma de Kondratiev, régimen político

Resumen

El artículo está dedicado a los problemas de estructuración de la historia creada por el estado, teniendo en cuenta una variedad de formas sociales, políticas, diversas velocidades de una génesis política. Se consideran los problemas de asignación de etapas de desarrollo de las organizaciones políticas (estadidad), teniendo en cuenta la incertidumbre de las unidades generales de análisis, términos y conceptos de paradigmas bastante diversos de estructuración y periodización de la historia. Se muestra que la fuerza decisiva que causa la transformación de todos los demás sectores públicos es el crecimiento, la distribución y la deducción de una posición dominante de los más efectivos en las condiciones de este período de un régimen político.

Citas

Bytyak, Y. P., Yakovyuk, I. V., Tragniuk, O., Komarova, T. V., & Shestopal, S. S. (2017). The State Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights: Correlation Problem. Man in India, 97(23), 577-588.

Chase-Dunn K., Hall T., (2001). One, two, many world systems//world Time. Issue 2. Novosibirsk.

Claessen H.J.M., Oosten J.G., (1996). Ideology and the formation of early states. Leiden.

Claessen HJ.M., Velde P. van de. Smith M.E., (1985). Development and decline; The evolution of sociopolitical organization. South Hadley (MA).

I.M. deacons (1994). Ways of history. From the most ancient person up to now. M,

Goudsblom J., (1996). Human History and Long-Term Social Processes: Toward a Synthesis of Chronology and Phaseology//Goudsblom J., Jones E.L, Mennell S.The Course of Human History. Economic Growth, Social Process and Civilization. M.E. Sharpe, N.Y.; L., P.20.

Ilyin M. V., (1999). Choice of Russia: myth, destiny, culture//Via Regia. No. 1-2.

Lyubashits V. Y., (1993). General theory of the state. P.1. Origin, essence and nature of the state. Rostov-on-Don,

Lyubashits V., (2017). Sociocultural measurement of institutional and functional characteristics of public-power interactions//Lyubashits V., Mamychev A., Uvarova G., Artyukhin O. Man in India. T. 97. No. 23. Page 461-470.

Lyubashits, V.Y., Mamychev, A.Y., Shalyapin, S.O., Filippova, M.K., (2016). Prognostic problems of the public and power organization of the Russian society: Archetypes and sociocultural basis of functioning and development. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (6). P.85-89.

Mamychev A. Yu., Kachurova S.V., Shestopal S.S., (2016). Socio-cultural (archetypal) basis of transformation of public power organizations: forms and directions. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, T5, No. 4 (17), 375-380.

Manut L.S., (1989). K. Marx as theorist of the state. M.

Martyshin O. V., (2003). History of political and legal doctrines / Under the editorship of O. V. Martyshin. M.

Marx K., Engels F. (1981). Compositions. M, 1955-1981. T.13.

Medvedev S. N., (2003). History of state and law of foreign countries. T. 1. Ancient world and middle centuries / Scientific editors: prof. S. N. Medvedev, doc. S. O. Zvonok. Moscow; Stavropol, 2003.

Mordovtsev A. Yu., Mamychev A. Yu., Shestopal S.S., (2017). Russian statehood as a particular civilizational and legal mentality type. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2017. T. 6. No. 4(21)

Mordovtsev A., Zhinkin S., Mamychev A., Yakovyuk I., Shestopal S. (2017). Legal Mentality in National Cultural Space: Characteristics of the ERA of Change (Church Schism of the 17th Century). Man in India, 97(23), 295-309.

Mordovtsev A.Y., Mamychev A. Yu., Shestopal S.S., (2017). Essential content of Russian legal mentality//Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2017. T. 6. No. 4(21)

Nersesyants V. S., (1985). History of political and legal doctrines. The ancient world / Under the editorship of V. S Nersesyants. M, 1985;

Nisbet R. (1969). Social Change and History. N.Y.

Pashinsky V. M., (1994). Recurrence in the history of Russia (a look from a position of social ecology)//the Policy. No. 4.

Popper K. (1993). Poverty of history science. M.

Room van C., (1984). Historians and Long Waves//Long Waves in the World Economy. L., R.237-244.

Rozov N. S., (1992). Structure of civilizations and tendencies of world development. Novosibirsk.

Rozov N. S., (1995). Possibility of theoretical history: answer to Karl Popper's call//philosophy Questions. 1995. No. 12. Page 55-69;

Rozov N. S., (1999). Structure of social ontology: on the way to synthesis of macrohistorical paradigms//Questions of philosophy. 1999. No. 2. Page 3-22;

Rozov N. S., (2001). Development and approbation of a method of theoretical history / Scientific editor N. S. Rozov. Novosibirsk, 2001; etc.

Rozov N. S., (2001). On the way to reasonable periodization of world history. Structures of history//world Time. Issue 2. Novosibirsk, 2001. Page 247.

Umov (Pangting) of V. I., Lapkin V. V., (1992). Kondratyevsky cycles and Russia: forecast of reforms//Policy. No. 4.

Walentin Lubaszyc, (2010). Ewolucja panstwa jako politycznej instytucji spolecznej. LIBER Warszawa