Un estudio sobre el Enfoque de la democracia fiscal y la República de Turquía.

Hashim Akcha; Volkan Yurdadog; Oghuzhan Bozatli.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v29i1.1854

Hashim Akcha Universidad de Cukurova, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Turquía.
Volkan Yurdadog Universidad de Cukurova, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Turquía,
Oghuzhan Bozatli. Universidad de Cukurova, Instituto de Ciencias Sociales, Turquía.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v29i1.1854

Palabras clave: Democracia fiscal, presupuesto, democracia, espacio fiscal, competencia fiscal

Resumen

El concepto de Democracia Fiscal, que aún no está completamente definido, tiene las cualidades básicas que pueden considerarse especialmente de acuerdo con las condiciones estructurales de los países. La democracia fiscal está tratando de determinar qué tan flexibles son los cuerpos ejecutivos elegidos. Como resultado de este índice, se debate hasta qué punto los países pueden responder a los deseos del público al mostrar cuánto pueden o no pueden actuar o tener espacio fiscal en el campo de las finanzas públicas. Cálculos anteriores de movimiento de los países, se calculó para Turquía el Balance del Gobierno General de obligatorio y opcional de hacer una distinción, Índice de Democracia Fiscal, que abarca el período 1950-2018.

Citas

Boadway, R. (2005). Income tax reform a globalized world: The case for a dual income tax. Journal of Asian Economics, 16, 910-927.

Bumko. (2018). Bütçe gerçekleşmeleri. http://www.bumko.gov.tr/TR,157/butce-buyuklukleri- ve-butce-gerceklesmeleri.html. Erişim: 22.11.2018.

Cagan, N. (1980). Demokratik sosyal hukuk devletinde vergilendirme, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 129-151.

Cagan, N. (1985). Anayasa çerçevesinde kamu maliyesinin kontrolü. Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, 2, 199-224.

Cagan, N. (2009). Modern bütçe sürecinde parlamento’nun rolü. içinde, Bütçe Sürecinde Parlamentonun Değişen Rolü, Uluslararası Sempozyum, 7-8, Ankara: TBMM Basımevi.

Cebi, C. (2015). Bütçe harcama katılığı, TCMB ekonomi notları, 23/17 Aralık.

Dag, H. (2017). Evaluation of the flexibility of budget expenditures in turkey: a periodic analysis, Ed. Aydin, M, Pınarcıoğlu, N.Ş. ve Uğurlu, Örgen. In current debates in public finance, public administration & environmental Studies, current debates, No. 13, IJOPEC Publication, London.

Echeverry, J.C., L. Fergusson and P. Querubín (2005), “Budget inflexibility”, documentos CEDE, No. 002070, Universidad de los Andes, September.

Edizdogan, N, Cetinkaya, O, Gumus, E. (2015). Kamu Maliyesi, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa.

Genschel, P. ve Schwarz, P. (2012). Tax competition and fiscal democracy, TranState working papers, No. 161, Univ. Sonderforschungsbereich 597 Staatlichkeit im Wandel, Bremen.

Genschel, P. ve Schwarz, P. (2013), Tax competition and fiscal democracy, in: Politics in the Age of Austerity, Polity, Ed: A. Schafer, W. Streeck, Cambridge, 59–83.

IMF (2013). Turkey: selected issues; IMF country report 13/364; November 4.

Mattina, T, ve Gunnarsson, V. (2007). Budget rigidity and expenditure efficiency in Slovenia, IMF working paper/07/131.

Mutluer, M.K, Oner, E, Kesik, A. (2010). Teori ve uygulamada kamu maliyesi, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

Nielsen, S.B. ve Sorensen, P.B. (1997). On the optimality of the Nordic system of dual income taxation. Journal of Public Economics 63, 311-329.

Oz, S. (2006). Gelir vergisinde vergiyi doğuran olay “Elde etme”, Ankara.

Ozbaran, M.H. (2004). Türkiye’de kamu harcamalarının son beş yılının harcama türlerine göre incelenmesi, Sayıştay Dergisi, 15(53), 115-138.

Rozensky, V. (2012). Mandatorní výdaje a flexibilita fiskální politiky v ČR, Politická Ekonomie.

Rubin, I.S. (1990). Budget theory and budget practice: How good is the fit?, Public Administration Review, 50(2), 179-189.

Singer, P. (1996). Budgeting and democracy, Revista de economia politica, 16 3(63), 20-30.

Sorensen, P.B. (1994). From the global income tax to the dual income tax: Recent tax reforms in the Nordic countries. İnternational Tax and Public Finance, 1(1), 57-79.

Steuerle, C. E. (2010). America’s related fiscal problems, Urban institute, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/28156/1001447-America-s-Related- Fiscal-Problems.PDF, Erişim: 12.11.2018.

Steuerle, C. E. (2012). Fiscal democracy or why sound fiscal policy in budget consolidation and inclusive growth require fewer, not more, attempts to control the future, (Ed). de Mello, L. and M. A. Dutz. Promoting Inclusive Growth: Challenges and Policies, OECD Publishing.

Steuerle, C. E. (2016). Restoring fiscal democracy. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/restoring-fiscal-democracy, Erişim: 12.11.2018.

Steurle, C.E. and Rennane, S. (2014). United States: Pioneer in fiscal surveillance, in restoring public debt sustainability in the role of independent fiscal institutions.

Streeck, W. (2015) ‘The rise of the European consolidation state, Max-PlanckInstitute fur Gesellschaftsforschung Discussion Paper 15(1): 1-28.

Streeck, W. and Mertens, D. (2010). An index of fiscal democracy. MPIfG Discussion Paper 10(3). Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

Yurdadog, V. ve Albayrak, M. (2017). OECD Ülkelerinde Vergi Rekabeti, Sosyoekonomi, 25(32), 121-148.