El mundo ruso. La cultura indígena en los idiomas y palabras obsoletas.

  • Nikolay F. Alefirenko Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Belgorod State National Research University
  • Anna T. Gigolaeva Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Belgorod State National Research University
  • Maria M. Golikova Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Belgorod State National Research University
  • Elena G. Ozerova. Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Belgorod State National Research UniversityBelgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia.
Palabras clave: cosmovisión, frasemia, palabra rusa, sinergia de etnocultura, cosmovisión lingüística de los rusos

Resumen

El concepto del artículo se basa en el concepto dominante de la civilización ruso-eslava, que es el "mundo ruso" en la unidad de su cultura e idioma originales. La plataforma cultural e histórica del concepto es la ortodoxia, la cultura eslava oriental y el idioma ruso. La realización de la idea básica del estudio presupone la eliminación de barreras entre las disciplinas que estudian los misterios del alma rusa y reconocen la idiomática como la forma principal de expresión cognitiva y discursiva y la existencia de cualquier etnocultura. La cosmovisión rusa es vista como una forma interna realizada de expresión ingenua (ordinaria) del espacio semántico de valor de la cultura autóctona. 

Citas

Alefırenko N.F. (2015). Ruthenian-East Slavic idioms in the light of the theory of discourse // Rusin, 3 (41), 153-168.

Alefırenko N.F. (2018). Cognitive-pragmatic sources of phraseosemiosis: Monograph. M.: Flint-Nauka, 192.

Bırıkh A.K., Mokıenko V.M., Stepanova L.I. (1998). The dictionary of Russian phraseology: historical and etymological reference book. - St. Petersburg: Folio Press.

Fejsa M. (2014).The Ruthenian journey from the Carpathian mountains to the Panonian Plain // « Rusin», 2 (36), 182-191.

Florensky P.A. (1990). Compositions in 2 volumes. V. 1. M.: URSS, 446.

Goodman N. (1979). Metaphor as moonlighting // On metaphor. Chicyfhhfnago; L.: The U. of Chicago, 126-137.

Kjargaard M.S. (1986). Metaphor and parable: A systematic analysis of the specific structure and cognitive function of the synoptic similes and parables qua metaphors. Leiden: Brill.

Kovshova M.L. (1990). The experience of the semantic field in the description of idioms // Phraseography in the Machine Fund of the Russian language. M., 80-81.

Kırıllova N.N. (1988). Subject and research methods of idioethnic phraseology. L., 81.

Likhachev D.S. (2000). Russian culture. M.: Publishing house "Art", 440.

Mınk L.O. (1978). Narrative form as a cognitive instrument // The writing of history: Literary form and historical understanding. Madison: U. of Wisconsin, 129-149.

Pinker, S. (1996). Der Sprachinstinkt. Wie der Geist die Sprache bildet. München: Kindler.

Postovalova V.I. (1999). Linguoculturology in the light of the anthropological paradigm (to the problem of the foundations and boundaries of modern phraseology) // Phraseology in the context of culture. M., 83-94.

Roysenzon L.I. (1973). The lectures on general and Russian phraseology: the textbook. Samarkand: Publishing house of the Samarkand state. University, 223.

Sepır E. (1993). Selected works on linguistics and cultural studies. M.: "Progress", 656.

Shakhovsky V.I., Panchenko N.N. (1999). National-cultural specificity of "deception" concept in the phraseological aspect // Phraseology in the context of culture. M., 285-288.

Stepanov Yu.S. (1997). Constants. The Dictionary of Russian culture. Research experience. M., 992.

Telıa V.N. (1993). Cultural-national connotations of phraseological units // Slavic linguistics. The XIth International Congress of Slavists. M., 302 - 314.

Yakovleva E.S. (1994). The fragments of the Russian language picture of the world (the models of space, time and perception). M.: Gnosis, 344.

Publicado
2019-10-01