Las principales direcciones para mejorar la eficiencia de regulación de las empresas transnacionales en condiciones modernas (en el ejemplo de azerbaiyán).

Muslumat A. Allakhverdiyeva; Gulnara Esabeli Azizova

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v29i1.1863

Muslumat A. Allakhverdiyeva State University of Economy of Azerbaijan
Gulnara Esabeli Azizova State University of Economy of Azerbaijan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v29i1.1863

Palabras clave: negocio transnacional, efectividad de la regulación, importación, transnacionalización

Resumen

El objetivo principal del estudio del artículo científico es una formulación de métodos complejos en la efectividad de las regulaciones comerciales transnacionales en la economía moderna de Azerbaiyán. Las principales direcciones para lograr estos propósitos se asignan de la siguiente manera: regulación general de los negocios transnacionales a nivel nacional; regulación de negocios transnacionales a nivel industrial (comercio exterior); regulación a nivel de las empresas transnacionales (SOCAR).

Citas

Aragón C, Aranguren MJ, Iturrioz C, Wilson JR (2014) A social capital approach for network policy learning: the case of an established cluster initiative. London, 145 p.

Bakan J. (2004). The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York, Free Press. 240 p.

Batmanova E.S., Tomilov P.S. (2005). World economy and international economic relations. Moscow, 120 p.

Bhanumurthy N.R., Singh P. (2013) Financial sector development and economic growth in Indian states. Int J Econ Policy Emerg Econ. London, 170 p.

Bondarenko V.A.(2012) Marketing activities in the context of globalization. Moscow: 260 p.

Borodin K.G. (2001), Theory of International Trade and Trade Policy, Moscow. 210 p.

Bozkurt Ö.G., Erdem C., Erotlu I. (2015) Identifying the factors affecting the economic growth of oil-producing countries. Istanbul, 120 p.

Emmoth A, Gebert Persson S, Lundberg H (2015) Interpartner legitimacy effects on cluster initiative formation and development processes. London, 480 p.

Gehringer A (2014) Financial liberalisation, financial development and productivity growth: an overview. Int J Monetary Econ Finance, 130 p.

Hausmann, Ricardo and Dani Rodrik (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, UK. pp. 603-633.

Krivopalov G.N. (2006). TNCs as an element of the economic mechanism of an open economy. Bulletin of the OSU. Moscow, № 10. Part 2.

Manko N.G.(1999) Principles of economics. St. Petersburg..884 p.

Mihajlović I. (2014) Possibilities for development of business cluster network between SMEs from Visegrad countries and Serbia. Serbian J Manag 9(2):145–148

Petrenko T.V. (2008) Transformation of the economic system and the evolution of the paradigm of economic science. Moscow, p. 190

Popkova EG, Akopova ES, Budanova IM, Natsubidze AS (2013b) The directions of transition of economic systems to new quality of economic growth. World Applied Science Journal. 1200 p.

Popkova EG, Tinyakova VI (2013c) Drivers and contradictions of formation of new quality of economic growth. Middle East J Sci Res, pp. 1635–1640

Reveiu A, Dârdală M (2015) Influence of cluster type business agglomerations for development of entrepreneurial activities study about Romania. Amfiteatru Econ 17(38), pp.107–119

Shagurin S.V., Shimko P.D.(2008). The economy of a transnational enterprise. GPU., pp 335.

The State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan - www.stat.gov.az

Vanka, GM, Heijman, WJ, y Vasiljevic, Z. (2012). Análisis del estado actual de las iniciativas de agrupación en la economía de transición Serbio. Economía Agrícola / Zemědělská Ekonomika, 58 (12): 566-579.