Lugar y papel de la voluntad del acusado en el sistema contencioso de los procesos penales.
Resumen
Se investiga la correlación y el mecanismo de interacción de la voluntad del acusado y el principio de adversarialismo. Los amplios poderes del acusado, que le permiten influir efectivamente en la actividad procesal penal, adquieren una importancia práctica adecuada solo en condiciones de competencia, que debido a la igualdad de las partes, actúa como una forma de organizar y llevar a cabo procesos penales. Al mismo tiempo, la expresión de voluntad se convierte en el principal medio para defender la posición del acusado en un caso penal y proteger los derechos e intereses legítimos.
Citas
Appeal ruling of the Chelyabinsk Regional Court of June 23, 2017 No. 10-2814 / 2017 // URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/BS4BI2Mtd0rV/ (accessed: 04/14/2019).
Daydzhest praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosam ugolov-nogo protsessa za 1 kvartal 2016 g. // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2016. № 3 // URL: http://www.ugpr.ru/article/1482-qqq-16-m3-22-03-2016-daydjest-praktiki-verhovnogo-suda-po-voprosam-ugolovnogo-protsessa-za-1-kvartal-2016-goda?IdSL=731759178&IdBatch=2823023&utm_medium=let-ter&utm_source=letternews&utm_campaign=letternews_2016.03.25_up_traffic_w12_read-ers_6863 (data obrashcheniya: 19.07.2019).
On some issues of the application by the courts of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the administration of justice: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Fed- eration of October 31, 1995, No. 8 (as amended on 03.03.2015) // URL: http://www.consult-ant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_8847 / (accessed date: 06/29/2019).
Postanovleniye Yevropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka po zhalobam № 40852/05 «Shlychkov protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (vyneseno 9 fevralya 2016 g., vstupilo v silu 9 maya 2016 g.) // Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016. № 4. S. 179-180.
Postanovleniye Yevropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka po zhalobe № 36814/06 «Chukayev protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (vyneseno 5 noyabrya 2015 g., vstupilo v silu 5 fevralya 2016 g.) // Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016. № 4. S. 175-179.
Silnov M. Admissibility of evidence // URL: http://www.center-bereg.ru/m3926.html (accessed: 06/10/2019).
The digest of practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on criminal matters for the 1st quarter of 2016 // Criminal process. 2016. No 3 // URL: http://www.ugpr.ru/article/1482-qqq-16-m3-22-03-2016-daydjest-praktiki-verhovnogo-suda-po-voprosam-ugolovnogo-protsessa-za -1-kvartal-2016-goda? IdSL = 731759178 & IdBatch = 2823023 & utm_medium = letter & utm_source =letternews & utm_campaign = letternews_2016.03.25_up_traffic_w12_read-ers_6863 (date of contact: 07/19/2019).
The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on complaint No. 36814/06 «Chukaev v. Russia» (issued on November 5, 2015, entered into force on February 5, 2016) // Review of judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2016. No. 4. P. 175-179.
The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on complaints No. 40852/05 «Shlychkov v. The Russian Federation» (issued on February 9, 2016, entered into force on May 9, 2016) // Review of judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2016. No. 4. P. 179- 180.
