Química para todos: experiencia de transformación de un curso de química general en una universidad inmersa en un contexto de vulnerabilidad
Resumen
Este trabajo presenta un proceso de transformación de un curso inicial de química para estudiantes de ingeniería basado en la implementación de Flipped Classroom e Indagación Guiada. Para evaluar su impacto se utilizó un Inventario de Conceptos de Química y un grupo focal. Se observan diferencias significativas en la comparación post/pre-test del inventario, tanto en la muestra global como en el segmento de estudiantes de sectores socioeconómicos más bajos (decil 1 al 4). Adicionalmente, los estudiantes manifiestan una visión positiva de los aprendizajes y competencias desarrolladas en el curso, aunque algunos aspectos de la evaluación son valorados negativamente. Es posible concluir que las estrategias de aprendizaje activo tienen una incidencia positiva en los aprendizajes y en la valoración del curso.
Citas
Biggs, J. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University Third Edition Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Higher Education, 9, 165–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.09.003
Birk, B., Jenkins, R. Bauer, S. Krause, M. Pavelich, (2004) Development and Application of a Chemistry Concept Inventory, Symposium on Research in Chemistry Education, 227th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Anaheim, CA.
Chasteen, S. V., Pollock, S. J., Pepper, R. E., & Perkins, K. K. (2012). Transforming the junior level: Outcomes from instruction and research in E&M. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020107
CNED. (2017). Índices Educación Superior. https://www.cned.cl/indices
Concha, A., Schiappacasse, L. N., Turra, H., & Villanueva, M. T. (2019). Chemistry in Context for engineering students at UCT: Transformation from a villain to a princess. Education in the Knowledge Society, 20, 1–16.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410– 8415. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Moya, B., Turra, H., & Chalmers, D. (2019). Developing and implementing a robust and flexible framework for the evaluation and impact of educational development in higher education in Chile. International Journal for Academic Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1555757
Piaget, J. (1965). The language and thought of the child. Psychological Bulletin(Vol. 24). http://doi.org/10.1037/h0067537
Reardon, S.F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane & G. Duncan (Eds.), Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality and the Uncertain Life Chances of Low-Income Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
Reid, S. A. (2016). A flipped classroom redesign in general chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17(4), 914–922. http://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00129G
Rein, K. S., & Brookes, D. T. (2015). Student response to a partial inversion of an organic chemistry course for non-chemistry majors. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(5), 797–802. http://doi.org/10.1021/ed500537b
Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on the student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical education, 91(9), 1334-1339.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research. Basics of Qualitative Research Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Vol. 3). http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Turra, H., Carrasco, V., González, C., & Sandoval, V. (2019). Flipped classroom experiences and their impact on engineering students ’ attitudes towards university-level mathematics. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1644963
Vigotsky, L. (1978). Pensamiento y lenguaje. In Obras escogidas Tomo II(pp. 1–433).
Weaver, G. C., & Sturtevant, H. G. (2015). Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Flipped Format General Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00316
Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331–357. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659
Zapata, G., & Tejeda, I. (2016). Educación superior en Iberoamérica. Informe 2016. (J. Brunner & D. Miranda, Eds.).
