Clasificación de Territorios de Desarrollo Socioeconómico Avanzado.
Resumen
La experiencia nacional y extranjera en el desarrollo de territorios con estatus legal especial para realizar actividades empresariales ha demostrado, que la efectividad de estas instituciones depende de factores, que deben ser estudiados y analizados en detalle. El artículo presenta la clasificación Territorios con Desarrollo Socioeconómico Avanzado (TDSEA) según el potencial del desarrollo industrial, y se propone evaluar el potencial del desarrollo industrial de acuerdo con el nivel de desarrollo socioeconómico, ubicación geográfica y nivel tecnológico predominante de la producción urbana. El análisis de los indicadores de monociudades especiales mostró que la mayoría de ellas se encontraba en una situación socioeconómica difícil, donde las más vulnerables fueron "Nadvoitsy", "Anzhero-Sudzhensk", y "Krasnoturinsk" y aquellas con TASED fueron "Nizhnekamsk", "Sosensky", "Tutaev".Citas
Andreeva E. L., Karkh D. A., Myslyakova Yu. G. (2017). A Conceptual Approach to Forming the Base Code of the Neo-Industrial Development of the Region // Economy of the Region. — — V. 13, Is. 3. — P. 732-745 doi 10.17059/2017-3-8
Buchwald E.M., Vilensky A.V. (2017). Development Institutions in the Strategic Planning of the Spatial Structure of the Russian Economy // Regional Economics. South of Russia. No. 1 (15). P. 77-86.
Roberta Capello (2011). Location, Regional Growth and Local Development Theories. AESTIMUM58, Giugno. С. 1-25.
G. Erdeli (1999). Dictionary of Human Geography, Corinth ed., Bucharest, с. 320.
Erik Stam, Ben Spigel (2016). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Discussion Paper Series 16-13. Utrecht School of Economics Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute.
Functional areas capitalization of local potential within the territorial development policies in Europe. Technical Conference on Functional Areas capitalization of local potential within the territorial development policies in Europe (2017). European Conference of Ministers responsible for Spatial/Regional Planning. Bucharest, 30th of May 2017.
Galiullina G.F., Kuznetsov B.L., Kuznetsova S.B. (2016). Foreign Experience of Creating Territories with a Special Regime // Science of Krasnoyarsk. No. 6-2 (29). p. 67-72.
Galiullina G.F., Kuznetsov B.L., Sharamko M.M. (2017). Territory of Advanced Socio- Economic Development: in Monocity: Necessary Conditions for Implementation. // In the Collection of Articles: Russian Regions in the Focus of Changes. Collection of Reports of the XI International Conference. Naberezhnye Chelny - Yekaterinburg. P. 139.
N.V. Kashina (2017). Territories of Advanced Development: New Tool of Attracting Investments to the Far East of Russia. Economy of the Region, V. 12, Is. 2, 569-585.
Richard Samans, Gemma Corrigan, Jennifer Blanke, Margareta Drzeniek Hanouz (2017). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017. World Economic Forum.
Romanova O. A. (2017). Innovative Paradigm of New Industrialization in the Conditions of Forming an Integrated World Economic Structure // Economy of the Region. V. 13, pp. 276- 289. doi 10.17059/2017–1–25
V.T. Shishmakov, S.V. Shishmakov (2017). Assessment of the Socio-Economic Potential of the DFO Subjects – a Basis for Choosing the Mechanism of the "Territory of Social-Economic Development (TASED)". Power and Management at the East of Russia, No. 1 (78), 14-17.
Social economy and social entrepreneurship – Social Europe guide. European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises. Volume 4. 108 pp. 2013.
Turgel I.D. (2017). New Institutions Supporting the Monocities // Economy and Politics. No. 2 (10). P. 72-75.
