Implementación del programa estatal de ambiente accesible de la federación rusa para el período 2011-2020 en la región trans-baikal como un mecanismo para mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas con discapacidad.
Resumen
El artículo trata de revelar el mecanismo de mejora de la calidad de vida de las personas con discapacidad representado por el programa estatal de la Federación de Rusia titulado: ‘Ambiente Accesible’. La implementación del programa estatal disminuye la carga económica en el presupuesto del país, mejora la calidad de vida de las personas con discapacidad, las hace participar en los procesos sociales y económicos y supera las barreras que impiden que las personas con discapacidad lleven una vida activa. El artículo analiza los enfoques básicos para el estudio del término "calidad de vida", encuentra sus características esenciales y su certeza funcional y tiene valor práctico para las agencias reguladoras y las agencias estatales, las organizaciones no gubernamentales y la sociedad mundial en general.
Citas
Afriyani, D., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Muksar, M. (2018). Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task based on Solo Taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 281-287.
Agenda An of Science for Environment and Development into the 21st Century. (1992). JCSU. Cambridge University Rress, 225.
Albercht, G. L., Devliegar, P., & Hove van, G. (2008). The experience of disability in plural societies. Revue europeene de recherché sur le handicap, 2, 1–13.
Allardt, E. (2002). Having, Loving, Being: An Alternative to the Swedish Model of Welfare Research. The Quality of Life. M. C. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.). 94–99.
Alzahrani, K. S. (2017). Metacognition and Its Role in Mathematics Learning: an exploration of the perceptions of a teacher and students in a Secondary School. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 521-537.
Antipieva, N. V. (2002). Social protection of those disabled in the Russian federation: Legal Regulation: Study Guide. Antipieva N.V. М.: Vlados-Press, 224.
Aron, R. (1972). Progress and Disillusion Hammonds worth: Penguin Books Ltd, 140.
Aronov, D. M., Zaitsev, V. P. (2002). The method of estimating the quality of life in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Cardiology, 5, 92–95.
Averina, Е. А. (2011). Integration of people with disabilities into the society: understanding the theory of the problem. Journal of the Tomsk State University, 1(13), 5–11.
Bauman, Z. (2005). Individualized Community. Translated from English. Ed. By V. L. Inozemtsev. М.: Logos, 390.
Beck, U. (1993). Die Erfmdung des Politischen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 210.
Bobkov, V. N., Kvachyov, V. G., Subetto, A. I., & Scherbakova, O. I. (2016). Scientific schools studying quality of life and related social structures in Russia. Living standards of Russian population in regions, 4, 9–13.
Dobrenkov, V. I. (1994). American sociological thought: texts. M. MGU Publ. House, 496.
Forrester, J. (2003). The World Dynamics. Trans. From English by A. Voroshuk and S. Pegov. Author: AST Publ. House, Saint-Petersburg: Terra Fantastica, 379.
Fromm, E. (2004). To have or to be? For the love for life. Transl. from English by P. S. Gurevich. М., 384.
Grigoriev S. I., & Subetto, A. I. (2000). The basis for non-classical sociology: new tendencies of sociological thinking culture development at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries. 2nd revised edition. M.: RUSAKI, 208.
Imrie, R. (2001). Barriered and Bounded Places and the Spatialities of Disability. Urban Studies, 38(2), 231-237.
Liga, M. B., & Schetkina, I. A. (2011). Quality of life: organizational and managing aspect. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 227.
Liga, M., Shchetkina, I., & Zakharova, E. (2018). Satisfaction with the Quality of Life as an Indicator of Social security. Espacios, 39(11). 15.
Mitin, M. B. (1977). Scientific and technical revolution, way of life and ideological struggle. Problems of sociological way of life. M.: Nauka, 19.
Naberushkina, E. K. (2010). Accessibility of the urban environment for people with disabilities. SOTSIS, 9, 58–64.
Osadchikh, A. I., Korobov, M. V., & Dubinina, I. A. (2005). To the issue of improvement of effectiveness and quality of work of medical and social assessment institutions. Medical and social expertise and rehabilitation: research journal, 3, 53–54.
Polyakova, N. L. (2004). The XX century in sociological theories of the society. M.: Logos, 384.
Popov, S. I. (1977). The problem of life quality in the modern ideological struggle. M.: Politizdat, 279.
Romanov, P. V., & Yarskaya-Smirnova, E. R. (2006). The policy of disability: social citizenship of those disabled in modern Russia. Saratov: Nauchnaya Kniga Publish. House, 206.
Rostow, U. (1973). Politics and growth stages. M.: Progress, 150.
Suslova, M. Y. (2000). On the socialization of a young person with a disability. Sociological studies, 6, 137–139.
Sytin, L. V. (2003). Rehabilitation of those disabled and its roles in the country’s labor potential. Medicine in the Kuzbas. 3, 3–6.
The ‘Accessible environment’ state program of the Russian Federation for 2011-2020. URL http://www.rosmintrud.ru/ministry/programms/3/0 (date of referral: 20.03.2018).
Tkachenko, V. S. (2007). Integration of those disabled into the Russian society. Thesis for Dr.sc.soc. Stavropol, 21.
Toffler, A. (1999). The third wave. М.: АSТ, 784.
Tolstykh, V. I. (1975). Way of life. Notion. Reality. Problems. М.: Politizdat, 184.
Yakunin, V. I., & Sulakshin, S. S. (2012). Post-industrialism. Experience of critical analysis. M.: Scientific expert, 288.
Zakharova, E. Y., Liga, M. B., & Schetkina, I. A. (2013). Quality of life models: monography. M.: RUSAKI, 167.
Zozulya, T. V. (2005). Complex rehabilitation of people with disabilities. М.: Academy, 304.
