La aplicación práctica de diferentes métodos de fitoindicación para estimar deslizamientos de tierra.
Resumen
Sobre la base de 400 descripciones geobotánicas de fitocenosis por elementos de las pendientes de deslizamiento de la orilla derecha del río Volga, se consideraron métodos de fitoindicación. Se propuso el algoritmo general de estudio de pendientes de deslizamientos, teniendo en cuenta el análisis ecológico, fitocenótico, biomorfológico, florístico y poblacional. Para laderas de deslizamientos cubiertos por bosques, el foco principal de la investigación fue la evaluación de la estructura de la población de especies arbóreas que forman bosques, teniendo en cuenta la dinámica de las reservas de madera. Para evaluar las similitudes o diferencias en la composición de especies de las fitocenosis de elementos de deslizamientos de tierra, se utilizó el Coeficiente de Similitud de Dados (CSD).Citas
Alestalo, J., 1971. Dendrochronological interpretation of geomorphic processes.Fennia105, 1– 139.
Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensociologie. — Wien — NewYork, 1964. — 865 p.
Casagli N, Catani F, Del Ventisette C, Luzi G. (2010). Monitoring, prediction, and early warning using ground-based radar interferometry. Landslides 7(3):291–301.Casagli et.al., 2010;
Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter MG, Pastor M, Ferlisi S, Tofani V, Hervás J, Smith J.T (2014). Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull EngGeol Environ 73(2):209–263.
Drude O. Die Ökologie der Pflanzen – Braunschweig, 1913.
Ermokhina K.A. (2009). Phytoindication of exogenous processes in the tundra of the central Yamal: The abstract from the thesis for the Master degree in Geography: 25.00.23; p. 21.
Fardeeva M.B., Mrakova A.V. (2013). The features of tree structure population dynamics in the process of landslide slope reforestation // Works of the II All-Russian scientific conf. with int. sc. “Environment and sustainable development of regions”. Kazan, – pp. 382-384.
Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage W.Z. (2008). Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. EngGeol 102 (3):85–98.
Guida, D., Pelfini, M., Santilli, M. (2008). Geomorphological and dendrochronological analyses of a complex landslide in the Southern Apennines.Geogr. Ann. A 90, 211–226.
Jones L.D. (2006). Monitoring landslides in hazardous terrain using terrestrial LiDAR: an example from Montserrat// Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, №39. -P. 371–373.
Klimes J. Yepes J., Becerril L, Kusak M, Galindo I. (2016). Development and recent activity of the San Andrés landslide on El Hierro, Canary Islands, Geomorphology, 261, 119-131.
Knizhnikov Yu.F., V.I. Kravtsova, O.V. Tutubalina (2004). Aerospace methods of geographical research // Textbook for universities. M.: Publishing Center "Academy", - 336 p.
Kozhevnikova M.V., Fardeeva M.B., Mugliev B.I. (2010). Phytoindication of landslide displacements during the monitoring of landslide processes // Geoecology. Ing. geology. Hydrogeology. Geocryology, No. 2. - pp. 171-177.
Kuteeva V.S., Fardeeva M.B. (2010). The use of phytoindication during the study of phytocenosis dynamics at landslide displacements // Abstracts from the doc. of All-Russian scientific-practical conf. "Students in science - the innovative potential of the future." Nab. Chelny,– pp. 16-18.
Maugeri М., Motta E., Raciti E., (2006). Mathematical modelling of the landslide occurred at GaglianoCastelferrato (Italy), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6, 133–143.
Mikhailov O.V., Golubev E.A., Smolyaninova E.I. (2013). Monitoring of landslide processes on the section of the North Caucasian railway using satellite radar intermeometry in various wavelength ranges and corner reflector. Geophysical surveys, pp. 5-22.
Palladino M.R., Turconi L, Luino F., Brunetti M.T., Peruccacci S., Guzzetti F. (2015). Influence of geological, morphological and climatic factors in the initiation of shallow landslides in north western Italy. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 1389–1392.
Petschko H, Brenning A, Bell R, Goetz J, Glade T. (2014). Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps—case study lower Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst 14(1):95–118.
Pradhan B. (2010). Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross- validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45(10):1244–1256.
Rogova T.V., Prokhorov V.E., Shaikhutdinova G.A., Shagiev B.R. (2010). Electronic databases of phytoindication data in the systems of natural ecosystem state evaluation and the maintaining biodiversity cadastres // Scientific notes of Kazan University, V. 152, Book. 1. - pp. 174-181
O.D. Smiletsev, A.V. Ivanov, N.V. Hayuk, K.A. Kravtsova, A.G. Cousin (2007). The use of geophysical methods to solve engineering and geological problems during the study of landslide processes in the October gorge of the city of Saratov // Saratov university Bulletin. V. 7. Ser. Earth Sciences, Issue 2.
Sousa RL, Karam K, Einstein H.H. (2014). Exploration analysis for landslide risk management. Georisk Assess Manag Risk EngSystGeohazard 8(3):155–170.
Stefanini, M.C. (2004). Spatio-temporal analysis of a complex landslide in the Northern Apennines (Italy) by means of dendrochronology. Geomorphology 63,191–202.
Sykora L. Fytoindikace sesuvnych uzemu v Cssk. Praha. Ceskoslov. Ak. Ved. 1961. 224 p.
The Water Code of the Russian Federation N 74-FZ issued on June 3, 2006 // RF CL. 2006 N 23. p. 2381.
Thiebes B, Bell R, Glade T, Jäger S, Mayer J, Anderson M, Holcombe L. (2014). Integration of a limit-equilibrium model into a landslide early warning system. Landslides 11(5):859–875.
Tsyganov D.N. (1983). Phytoindication of ecological regimes in the subzone of coniferous- deciduous forests. M.: Science, –197 p.
Turmanina V.I. (1964). The interaction of vegetation with landslide processes of the slopes on the example of landslides in Moscow and Moscow region. The abstract from the thesis for the Master degree in Geography, Moscow: 18 p.
Van Westen CJ, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R. (2006). Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull EngGeol Environ 65:167–184.
Varnes D.J. (1984). Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. In: Natural hazards 3. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris. 63 p.
Voronov A.G. (1973). Geobotany. 2nd edition, rev. and add. - M.: Higher School, - 384 p., Il.
Wu X, Niu R, Ren F, Peng L. (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using rough sets and back-propagation neural networks in the three gorges, China. Environ Earth Sci 70(3):1307– 1318.
