El punto de vista de las mujeres en “a room of one´s own and three guineas”: percepciones de estudiantes de pregrado en modo de lectura digital.
Resumen
El estudio actual tuvo como objetivo abordar cómo se reflejaba el estado de las mujeres inglesas a principios del siglo 20 a través de los lentes de una mujer y las posibles razones y soluciones para esto desde el punto de vista de una mujer. En este caso, seis mujeres graduadas y ocho estudiantes graduados con nueve nacionalidades diferentes leyeron los textos en modo de lectura digital y evaluaron el punto de vista de las mujeres en los chats grupales de Messenger. Los datos textuales recopilados a través de chats grupales fueron respaldados por los datos obtenidos de dos exámenes para llevar a casa. El análisis temático de los datos reveló los temas como educación distorsionada, sociedad patriarcal y barreras sociales.
Citas
Alexander, S. (2000). Room of One's Own: 1920s feminist utopias. Women: A cultural review. 11(3), 273-288.
AlGweirien, H. (2017). Virginia Woolf’s representation of women: A Feminist reading of “The Legacy”. English Language and Literature Studies. 7(1),120-125.
Atamturk, N. (2018). Graduate students’ views of topic attributes in e-books. IIOABJ. 9 (3),130-134.
Baroughi, E., & Zarei, M. H. (2013). The Ranking of Effective Factors on Efficiency of Commercial Ads In Attracting Viewers In Tehran, Iran.
Baxter, P. Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers . The Qualitative Report. 13(4), 544-559.
Buzzetto-More, N., Sweat-Guy, R., & Elobaid, M. (2007). Reading in a digital age: E-books are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects. 3, 239–250.
Chen, C.-N., Chen, S.-C., Chen, S.-H.E., & Wey, S.-C. (2013). The effects of extensive reading via e-books on tertiary level EFL students’ reading attitude, reading comprehension and vocabulary. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 12, 303–312.
Chou, I.-C. (2016). Reading for the purpose of responding to literature: EFL students’ perceptions of e-books, Computer Assisted Language Learning. 29,1, 1-20.
Dorsch, Ellen, Livingston Joy and Rankin, Johanna. (1991) “If Patriarchy Creates War, Can Feminism Create Peace?” Hunter, Anne E. Ed. Genes and Gender: On Peace, War and Gender. New York: The Feminist Press.
Duran, E. (2013). Investigation on views and attitudes of students in faculty of education about reading and writing on screen, Educational Research and Review. 8, 203–211.
Foasberg, N. M. (2014). Student reading practices in print and electronic media. College & Research Libraries. 75(5),705–23.
Ghazanfarpour, H., Pourkhosravani, M., & Mousavi, S. E. (2013). Geomorphic systems affecting the Kerman.
Green, T. D., Perera, R. A., Dance, L. A. & Myers, E. A. (2010). Impact of presentation mode on recall of written text and numerical information: Hard copy versus electronic. North American Journal of Psychology.12, 233–242.
Gregory, C.L. (2006). But I want a real book: An investigation of undergraduate’s usage and attitudes toward electronic books. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 47(3), 266–273.
Hukill, G. S., Arnold, J. M. & Klein, J.T. (2017) Reading in the digital age: A case study in faculty and librarian collaboration, College & Undergraduate Libraries. 24,2-4, 574-594.
Jones, C. M. J. (2015). Virginia Woolf's A Room of One's Own and the Problem of Inherited Wealth'. In C. Jones, & E. Hogg (Eds.), Influence and Inheritance in Feminist English Studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Keller, A. (2012). In print or on screen? Investigating the reading habits of undergraduate students using photo-diaries and photo-interviews, Libri: International Journal of Libraries & Information Services. 62(1),1–18.
Langan, M. & Day, L. (eds) (1992). Women, oppression and social work. London, Routledge.
Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: A survey at the university of Denver. Collection Building, 26(1), 7–14.
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation. 61(6), 700 – 712.
Margolin, S. J., et al., (2013). E-readers, computer screens, or paper: does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology. 27, 512.
Mash, S.D. (2003). Libraries, books, and academic freedom. Academe. 89(3), 50–55.
Mercieca, P. (2004). E-book acceptance: What will make users read on screen? In T. Denison (Ed.), VALA 2004 breaking boundaries: Integration and interoperability (pp. 1–11). Victoria, Australia: Victorian Association for Library Automation.
Meyer, B. (2015). Researching Translation and Interpreting. Angelelli, Claudia V. and Brian James Baer, (eds). London/New York: Routledge, 291 p.
Middleton, Victoria. (1982). Three Guineas: Subversion and survival in the professions. Twentieth Century Literature. 28(4), 405-417.
Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ academic reading format preferences and behaviors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 41, 301–11.
Norman, E. & Furnes, B. (2016). The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media? Computers in Human Behavior. 54, 301–309.
Porion, A. (2016). The impact of paper-based versus computerized presentation on text comprehension and memorization, Computers in Human Behavior. 54, 569–576.
Ratcliffe, K. (1993). A Rhetoric of Textual Feminism: (Re)Reading the Emotional in Virginia Woolf’s Three Guineas, Rhetoric Review.11(2), 400-417.
Rogers, M.. & Roncevic, M. (2002). E-books aftermath: Three more publishers fold electronic imprints. Library Journal, 127, 4.
Shiach, M. (2017). On or about December 1930, Angelaki, 22:1, 279-288.
Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Taylor, A. (2011). Students learn equally well from digital as from paperbound texts, Teaching of Psychology. 38(4), 278-281.
Üstün, Y., Dimililer, Ç. (2017). Teacher opinions on usage of mobile learning in pre-school foreign language learning, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 13(8), 5405-5412.
Vernon, R.F. (2006). Paper or pixels? An inquiry into how students adapt to online textbook, Journal of Social Work Education. 42, 417–428.
Warschauer, M. (2015). From computers and the web to mobile devices and e-texts: the transition to digital reading continues, in: R. Spiro et al. (Eds), Reading at a Crossroads: Disjunctures and Continuities in Current Conceptions and Practices, New York: Routledge.
Woody, W.D., Daniel, D.B., & Baker, C.A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks, Computers & Education. 55, 945–948.
Woolf, V. (1992). A Room of One’s Own. London: Penguin.
Young, B. J. (2000). Gender differences in student attitudes toward computers, Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 33, 204–216.
