Prácticas actuales de pensamiento crítico en aulas de inglés como segunda lengua.
Resumen
La investigación tiene como objetivo evaluar la actitud de los profesores de inglés para incorporar el pensamiento crítico en la educación de idiomas a nivel universitario en Pakistán. Mediante entrevistas a diez profesores, se descubrieron sus percepciones sobre pensamiento crítico. Otro propósito de esta investigación es evaluar sus comportamientos hacia la conducción del pensamiento crítico y cómo lo utilizan para reflexionar sobre las actividades de los estudiantes. El estudio reveló, que desafortunadamente, estos profesores están trabajando con definiciones limitadas del pensamiento crítico, y su verdadera esencia no se transmite a los alumnos, dificultando su rendimiento académico y crecimiento profesional. El estudio sugiere la necesidad de capacitaciones para estos profesores, donde se equipen de estrategias de pensamiento crítico que adapten a sus situaciones.
Citas
Al-Rukban, M. O. (2006). Guidelines for the construction of multiple-choice questions tests. Journal of family & community medicine, 13(3), 125.
Angus, K. (2016). Saying vs. doing: A contradiction in the professional development of foreign language teaching assistants. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 819-835.
Benesch, S. (1999). Thinking critically, thinking dialogically. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (3), 573-580.
Brady, A. M. (2005). Assessment of learning with multiple-choice questions. Nurse Education in Practice, 5(4), 238-242.
Brown, G. A., Bull, J., &Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge.
Burton, S. J., Sudweeks, R. R., Merrill, P. F., & Wood, B. (1990). How to prepare better multiple-choice test items: Guidelines for university faculty (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University. Department of Instructional Science).
Christoffersen, L., &Johannessen, A. (2015). ForskningsmetoderförLärarstudenter. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Coombe, C. (2010). Fundamentals of language assessment. Journal of NELTA, 12(1), 36-46.
Dean, B. L. (2005). Citizenship education in Pakistani schools: Problems and possibilities. International Journal of citizenship and Teacher education, 1(2), 35.
Dervan, P. (2017, December). To use (or not to use) Multiple Choice Questions in assessing higher education students, that is the Question. In International Conference on Engaging Pedagogy (ICEP) (Vol. 2).
Donnelly, C. (2014). The use of case based multiple choice questions for assessing large group teaching: Implications on student's learning. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 3(1). Retrieved from: http://arrow.dit.ie/ijap/vol3/iss1/12
Dörnyei, Zoltan. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downing, S. M. (2002). Construct-irrelevant variance and flawed test questions: Do multiple-choice item-writing principles make any difference? Academic Medicine, 77(10), S103-S104.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction, Executive summary. Millbrae: California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical Thinking: What it is and why it counts (6th ed.). Millbrae: California Academic Press.
Fellenz, M. R. (2004). Using assessment to support higher level learning: The multiple-choice item development assignment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 703-719.
Hager, P., Sleet, R., Logan, P. & Hooper, M. (2003). Teaching critical thinking in undergraduate science courses. Science and Education, 12 (3), 303-313.
Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choiceitem-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied measurement in education, 15(3), 309-333.
Jennings, D. (2012). The Design of Multiple-Choice Questions for Assessment (ABR). UCD Teaching and Learning, UCD, Ireland.
King, P. M. (1978). William Perry's theory of intellectual and ethical development. New directions for student services, 1978(4), 35-51.
Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16-31.
Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (8), 781-796.
Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction.
McDermott, K. B., Agarwal, P. K., D'Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L. III, & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(1), 3-21.
McPeck, J. E. (2016). Critical thinking and education. Routledge.
Mizumoto, A., Ikeda, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2016). A comparison of cognitive processing during cloze and multiple-choice reading tests using brain activation. ARELE: Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 27, 65-80.
Mullins, J. R. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Secondary Educational Contexts on College Student Formation and Development.
Norris, S., & Ennis, R. (1992). Evaluating critical thinking. Pacific Grove, CA: Thinking Press and Software.
Perry, B., Donovan, M. P., Kelsey, L. J., Paterson, J., Statkiewicz, W., & Allen, R. D. (1986). Two schemes of intellectual development: A comparison of development as defined by William Perry and Jean Piaget. Journal of research in science teaching, 23(1), 73-83.
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical growth in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Perry forms of Intellectual and Ethical Growth in the College Years1970.
Peterson, K., DeCato, L., & Kolb, D. A. (2015). Moving and learning: Expanding style and increasing flexibility. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(3), 228-244.
Schwarm, S. E., &Ostendorf, M. (2005, June). Reading level assessment using support vector machines and statistical language models. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 523-530). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453-472.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Science (2nd edition). New York: Teachers College Press.
Siegel, H. (1997). Rationality Redeemed? New York: Routledge.
Stapleton, P. (2011). A Survey of Attitudes towards Critical Thinking among Hong Kong Secondary School Teachers: Implications for Policy Change. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 14-23.
Vegada, B., Shukla, A., Khilnani, A., Charan, J., & Desai, C. (2016). Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study. Indian journal of pharmacology, 48(5), 571.
Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2018). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. In Self-Regulation and Self-Control (pp. 45-77). Routledge.
Watson, G., &Glaster, E. (1980). Critical thinking appraisal manual. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Zhang, L. F. (1999). A comparison of US and Chinese university students' cognitive development: The cross-cultural applicability of Perry's theory. The Journal of Psychology, 133(4), 425-439.
