Marcadores de compromiso en editoriales de periódicos pakistaníes en inglés: un estudio basado en corpus.
Resumen
Este estudio analiza e interpreta los marcadores de compromiso (EM) como características del metadiscurso en cuatro periódicos paquistaníes en inglés. Para este propósito, propone un nuevo modelo de marcadores de compromiso como el metadiscurso a partir de los modelos existentes. El modelo propuesto se ha clasificado en expresiones inclusivas, personalización, expresión de preguntas de direcciones de los lectores, pasajes, anécdotas y comentarios. Se ha propuesto una lista detallada de marcadores de compromise. Los resultados de este estudio revelaron que el corpus de The Frontier usaba marcadores de compromiso excesivos en comparación con otros cuerpos: The News, Dawn News y The Express Tribune. En conclusión, el corpus de The Frontier es más fácil de leer debido al uso excesivo de marcadores de compromise.
Citas
Blagojevic, S. (2009). Expressing Attitudes in Academic Research Articles Written by English and Serbian Authors. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-Linguistics and Literature, 7(1), 63-73.
Crismore, A. (1983). Metadiscourse: What it is and how it is used in School and Non-school Social Science Texts. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, 273. University of Illinois.
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. NY: Peter Lang Publishers.
Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in Introductory Course Books. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3-26.
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, NY: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2005a). A Convincing Argument: Corpus Analysis and Academic Persuasion. In Connor, U., & Upton, T. Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (2005b). Representing Readers in Writing; Students and Experts Practices. Linguistics and Education, 16, 363-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. linged.2006.05.002.
Kindiki, S. K. (2008). Pragmatic Functions of Attitude Markers in Kîîtharaka.
Kuhi, D., Mojood, M., & Branch, M. (2012). A Contrastive Study of Metadiscourse in English and Persian Editorials. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 137-162.
Milne, E. D. (2003). ‘Metadiscourse Revisited: A Contrastive Study of Persuasive Writing in Professional Discourse’. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Madrid: Complutense University of Madrid.
Milne, E. D. (2008). ‘The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse’. Journal of Pragmatics 40, 95-113.
Nabifar, N., & Shenasi, M. (2014). The Comparative Investigation of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Used by American and Iranian Editors in English Newspapers. Today Science Journal of Humanity, 2(2), 12-21.
Negahdari, A. (2009). Attitude Markers in English and Persian. University of Khorasgan Azad.
Oskouei, L. K. (2011). Interactional Variation in English and Persian: A Comparative Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Magazine Editorials. Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia Norwich.
Vande Kopple, W. J. (2002). ‘Metadiscourse, Discourse, and Issues in Composition and Rhetoric’. In E. L. Barton and G. Stygall (eds.), Discourse Studies in Composition. Cresskill and NJ: Hampton Press, 91-113.
