La modalidad Autobiografía "Si soy asesinado" por Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto en inglés y su traducción al Urdu.

Ali Raza Siddique; Syed Kazim Shah; Muhammad Ahmad.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v27i1.1584

Ali Raza Siddique Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Syed Kazim Shah Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ahmad. Government High School, Hujra Shah Muqeem, Okara, Pakistan; Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v27i1.1584

Palabras clave: autobiografía, boulomaica, deóntica, epistémica, percepción

Resumen

Este studio examina la autobiografía como género literario, y selecciona la autobiografía "Si soy asesinado" de Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, escrito en inglés y suversión en urdu para el estudio. Los propósitos del estudio son cómo la equivalencia de la traducción se mantiene a través del texto de origen, encontrar el uso más frecuente del tipo de modalidad, y cómo se dibujan sombras de textos en ambos textos, y explorer las implicaciones socio-políticas de la modalidad. El estudio ha seguido y redefinido un modelo con respecto a modelos existentes según los significados se configuran a través de tipos de modalidad deóntica, epistémica, boulomaica y de percepción. Este studio tiene como objetivo comprender la imagen real y la narrative del escritor que se retrata en los textos.

Citas

Abbas, Q., & Khan, A. N. (2009). Lexical functional grammar for Urdu modal verbs. In 2009 International Conference on Emerging Technologies, p. 7-12.

Baker, M. (2010). Interpreters and translators in the war zone: Narrated and narrators. The Translator, 16(2), 197-222.

Bardaji, A. G. (2009). Procedures, techniques, strategies: translation process operators. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 17(3), 161-173.

Bassnett, S. (2005). Translation, gender and otherness. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 13(2), 83-90.

Benjamin, W. (2002). Selected writings, 3, 1935–1938. Trans. Edmund Jephcottand others. Ed. Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Catford, J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Chesterman, A. (1997). Memes of translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

DeRose, K. (1991). Epistemic possibilities. The philosophical review, 100(4), 581-605.

Dryden, J. (1680). Ovid's epistles. London: Jacob Tonson.

Egan A., Hawthorne, J., & Weatherson. B. (2005). Epistemic modals in context. In Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, edited by Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter, (pp. 131–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fowler, R. 1977. Linguistics and the novel. London: Methuen.

Frank, G. (1985). Becoming the other: Empathy and biographical interpretation, Biography 8(3): 189–210.

Güttinger, F. (1963). Zielsprache. Zurich, Manesse Verlag.

Hacking, I. (1967). Possibility. The philosophical review, 76(2): 143–168.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundation of Language, 6, 322-361.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985/1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Iwamoto, N. (2007). Modality and point of view in media discourse. Retrieved December, 17, 2013.

Jakobson, R. (1959). On Linguistic aspects of translation. In: Brower, Ruben A. (ed.) On Translation (232-239). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Jeyanthi, E., Zalina, K. M., Afida, A., & Arbaayah, A. T. (2018). The hunger games: Linguistic modality as reflector of point of view in a Dystopian Novel. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(4).

Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact in Bierwisch, M. end K.E, Heidolph. Progress in Linguistics, Mouton.

Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, edited by H. J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser, (p. 38–74). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, edited by Arnimvon Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich, p.639-650. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Krings, H. P. (1986). Was in denKöpfen von Übersetzernvorgeht: EineempirischeUntersuchungzurStruktur des ÜbersetzungsprozessesanfortgeschrittenenFranzösischlernern (Vol. 291). GNV.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Towards a semantic description of English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Lillian, D. (2008). Modality, persuasion and manipulation in Canadian conservative discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 2(1), 1-16.

Lo´pezGuix, G., & Minett Wilkinson, J. (1997). Manual de traduccio´ningle´scastellano. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.

Mason, I. (1982). The role of translation theory in the translation. Class Quinguereme, 10(2).

Mounin, G. (1963). lesproblémesthéorigues de Iatraduction. Paris.

Munday, J. (2009). Introducing translation studies: Theories and applications. Oxon: Routledge.

Newmark, P. (1981). Approaches to translation (Language Teaching Methodology Senes). Oxford: Pergamon Press. https://doi. org/10.1017.

Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation (Vol. 66). New York: Prentice Hall.

Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Brill Archive.

Nida, E., & Taber, C. (1969-1982). The theory and practice of translation, E. J. Brill, Leiden.

Nordquist, R. (2018). Modality (Grammar and Semantics). ThoughtCo, www.thoughtco.com/modality-grammar-and-semantics-1691396

Palmer, F. (2003). Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues. Modality in Contemporary English, ed. by Facchinetti, Roberta et al. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Palmer, F. R. (1990). Modality and the English modals, London and New York: Longman.

Reiss, K. (1971). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übersetzungskritik.München, Max HueberVerlag.

Schepeler, E. (1990). The biographer's transference: A chapter in psycho- biographicalepistemology. Biography, 13(2), 111-129.

Simpson, P. (1990). Modality in literary-critical discourse. In Nash, W. (ed.) 1990, 63-94.

Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.

Simpson, P. (2003). Language, ideology and point of view. Routledge.

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London, England: Routledge.

Simpson, P. (2005). Language ideology and point of view (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.

Steiner, G. (1975). After Babel. London.

Teller, P. (1972). Epistemic possibility. Philosophia, 2, 302–320.

Toolan, M. (1998). Language in literature: An introduction to stylistics. London: Arnold.

Vázquez-Ayora, G. (1977). Introducción a la traductología: cursobásico de traducción. Georgetown University Press.

Watson, M. (2004). Theories of narrative and their application to the study of Heike monogatari, in James Baxter, ed., Observing Japan from Within, Kyoto: Nichibunkenkenky, 2004.

Wigiyanti, A. W. (2012). A Translation analysis of English modal verb in Alice in Wonderland film and its translation (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Wotjak, G. (1981). Técnicas de translación. Aspetosfundamentales de la teoría de la traducción. La Habana: Ediciones Pueblo y Educación, 197-229.