Medición de dimensiones del pensamiento crítico en las preguntas del examen BISE y A-Level mediante el uso del esquema Perry.
Resumen
El objetivo del estudio es investigar las preguntas de nivel del examen BISE y nivel A, que fomentan habilidades del pensamiento crítico y la disposición de pensamiento crítico entre estudiantes universitarios. La investigación es comparada y adoptó el esquema de Desarrollo intelectual y ético de Perry. Los datos de investigación se tomaron de fuentes en línea de cinco años (2014-2018). Los hallazgos concluyeron que las preguntas del examen de primer año BISE son dualistas: de un bajo nivel de Desarrollo intelectual y dificulta el crecimiento lógico y racional de los estudiantes. Las preguntas de los exámenes de nivel A obligan a los estudiantes a pensar creativamente y las preguntas cubren significativamente la multiplicidad, el relativismo y las posiciones de compromiso, que de alguna manera, aumentan la disposición al pensamiento crítico.
Citas
Adams, M. H, Whitlow, J. F, Stover, L. M., & Johnson, K. W. (1996). Critical thinking as an educational outcome: An evaluation of current tools of measurement. Nurse Educator,21, p.23- 32. PMid:8788823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006223-199605000-00009.
Ahmad, S. & Malik, S. (2011). Examination Scheme at Secondary School Level in Pakistan: Composite vs Split. Canadian Social Science, 7 (1) Pp. 130-139.
Akpınar, E. (2003). Cognitive levels of the written exam questions of the secondary school’s geography courses. Erzincan Education Faculty Journal, 5 (1), 13-21.
Akpınar, E., & Ergin, O. (2006). The evaluation of science teachers’ exam questions. MilliEgitim, 172, 225-231.
Alazzi. F.K. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking: A study of Jordanian secondaryschool social studies teachers. The Social Studies. 2008; 243-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.99.6.243-248.
Baysen, E. (2006). The levels of teacher questions and student answers. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 14 (1), 21-28.
Çepni S, Özsevgeç T, Gökdere M (2003). Investigation of OSS exam questions and high school physics teachers’ exam questions according to bloom taxonomy and formal reasoning level. J. Turkish Nat. Edu. 157, 30-39.
Çepni, S., & Azar, A. (1998). The analysis of physics questions used at high school exams. Proceedings of the Third National Symposium of Science Teaching. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University.
Çepni, S., Ayvacı, H., &Keles, E. (2001). The comparison of science exam questions used athigh schools and high school entrance exams regarding Bloom’s taxonomy. Proceedings of the Science Teaching Symposium in Turkey at Millennium. Istanbul: Maltepe University.
Çepni, S., Keles, E., & Ayvacı, H. S. (1999). The comparison of physics questions used at university entrance exam (ÖSS) and high school exams. Proceedings of the Turkish Physical Society 18th Physics Conference. Adana: University of Çukurova.
Christie, T. & Afzaal, M. (2005). Rote Memorization as a Sufficient Explanation of Secondary School Examination Achievement in Pakistan: An Empirical Investigation of a Widespread Assumption., Paper Presented in the conference. Assessment and the future schooling and learning held in Abuja, Nigeria. Retrieved from: http://www.aku.edu/AKUEB/pdfs/IAEA05.pdf (Accessed: 27/12/2011).
Culver, R. S., & Hackos, J. T. (1982). Perry’s model of intellectual development. Engineering Education, 72, 221–226.
Cummins, J. (2002). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in The Crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
DeBlock (1972). La taxonomie des objectifspur la discipline du Latin. Didactica Classica Gandensio, 12-13, 119-131.
Dindar, H., & Demir, M. (2006). Evaluation of fifth grade primary teachers’ questions in science exams according to Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 26 (3), 87-96.
Distler, J.W. (2007). Critical thinking and clinical competence: Results of the implementation of student- centered teaching strategies in an advanced practice nurse curriculum. Nurse Edu In Prac, 7,53-59.
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework for any discipline. International J. of Teach and Learn in Higher Educ, 17,160-166.
Ennis, R.H. (2007). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. J. Baron &R. Sternberg, (Eds.). New York: Freeman.
Erman, E. (2008). Evaluation of the history questions that were asked in the secondary education institution exams between the years 2003-2006 by using Bloom’s taxonomy. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ankara: Gazi University.
Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (1997). Critical thinking assessment in nursing education programs: An aggregate data analysis. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61–84.
Gagné, R. M. & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gallagher, J., & Aschner, M.J. (1963). A preliminary report on analysis of classroom interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 9, 183-194.
Gallagher, S. A. (1998). The road to critical thinking: The Perry Scheme and meaningful differentiation. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 12-20
Garlikov, R (2006). The Socratic method: Teaching by asking instead of telling.
Gelen, I. (1999). The evaluation of fourth grade elementary school teachers’ competences about teaching thinking skills in social studies course. Unpublished MA Thesis. Adana: University of Çukurova.
Gerlach, V. & Sullivan, A. (1967). Constructing statements of outcomes. Inglewood CA, Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heiemann.
Gürses, A., Bayrak, R., Bozoglu, S., Açıkyıldız, M., Dogar, Ç., & Özkan E. (2005). The analysis of the exam questions used in secondary level chemistry courses. SelçukÜniversitesiEgitimFakültesiDergisi, 19, 349-367.
Haladynan, T.M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hannah, L.S., & Michaelis, J.U. (1977). A Comprehensive Framework for Instructional Objectives: A Guide to Systematic Planning and Evaluation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hofer, B.K. and Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relations to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
Hussain, N. (2003). Helping EFL/ESL students by asking quality questions.
Karaman. (2005). An analysis of physics exam questions in the high schools of Erzurum according to the levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty,25 (1), 77- 90.
Khan, I. (2011). Reading Assessment Techniques among selected Secondary School Teachers in Pakistan: Current Trends and Practices. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications,2(2), p.58-75.
Khan, S. (2006). An evaluation of the exercises provided in the English compulsory textbook for class X, [Unpublished MA dissertation] Faculty of English Linguistics, University of Karachi.
Knefelkamp, L. L., & Slepitza, R. L. (1978). A cognitive-developmental model of career development: An adaptation of the Perry scheme. In C. A. Parker (Ed.), Encouraging development in college students (pp. 135–150). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Knefelkamp, L.L. (1974) Developmental Instruction: Fostering Intellectual and PersonalGrowth in College Students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 1271A (University Microfilms No. 75-21, 059).
Kögce, D., & Baki, A. (2009). Comparing mathematics questions’ levels in different type ofhigh schools according to bloom taxonomy. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 17 (2), 557-574.
Koray, O.C., & Yaman, S. (2002). An assessment of questioning skills of science teacheraccording to Bloom's taxonomy. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 10 (2), 317-324.
Lewis, A., & Smith, D.C. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice. Teaching for Higher Order Thinking, 32(3), 131-137.
Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition Learning, 5, 137-156.
Mahn, V-J, Steiner., & Holbrook. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. University of New Mexico: Lawrencce Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 191-206.
Maier, N. R. F. (1937). Reasoning in rats and human beings. The Psychological Review, 44, 365-378.
Moore, W. S. (1991). The Perry scheme of intellectual and ethical development: An introduction to the model and two major assessment approaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Moore, W. S. (1994). Student and faculty epistemology in the college classroom: The Perryscheme of intellectual and ethical development. In K. Pritchard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching (pp. 45–67). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Moore, W. S. (2002). Understanding learning in a postmodern world: Reconsidering the Perry scheme of intellectual and ethical development. In B. Hofer & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 17–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mundy K., & Denham, S.A. (2008). Nurse educators – still challenged by critical thinking. Teaching and Learning in Nursing Education. (3), 94-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2008.02.007
Mutlu, M., Usak, M., & Aydogdu, M. (2003). Evaluation of science exam questions according to Bloom’s taxonomy. Kırsehir Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (2), 87-95.
Onosko, J. J. (1988). Promoting students’ thinking through thoughtful classroom discourse: An analysis of teachers’ thoughts and practices. USA Michigan: University Microfilms International Dissertation Information Service.
Ozden, Y. (1999). Ogrenmeve Ogretme. (Learning and Teaching) Ankara: PegemAYayınları.
Ozgur, N. (2007). Teachers’ questions: Do they encourage critical thinking. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Eskisehir: Anadolu University.
Ozmen, H., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2006). The analysis of lycee-II physics-chemistry exam questions’ and students’ success in energy chapter as to cognitive domain. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 14 (1), 91-100.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol.2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E., Bohr, L. and Zusman, B. (1993). ‘Cognitive impacts of living on campus versus commuting to college’, Journal of College Student Development, 34(3), 216–220.
Pavelich, M. J., & Moore, W. S. (1996). Measuring the effect of experiential education usingthe Perry model. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(4), 287–292. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00247.x.
Perry, W.G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Perry, W.G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning, in Chickering, A. (ed.), The Modern American College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 76–116.
Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237–249.
Pithers, R.T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in Education: A review. Educ Research, 42, 237-249.
Riddell T. (2007). Critical assumptions: Thinking critically about critical thinking. Jour of NurEdu,46, 121-126.
Romizowski. A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. London: Kogan Page/New York: Nichols Publishing.
Ryan, M.P. (1984a). Conceptions of prose coherence: Individual differences in epistemological Standards. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(6), p.1226–1238.
Sadker, D. (2003). Classroom questions: Types of questions, feedback, effective questioning practices.
Schneider, V. (2002). Critical thinking in the elementary classroom: Problems and solutions.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking defined. Handout given at the Critical Thinking Conference, Atlanta, GA.
Shaffer, H.J. (1996) Understanding the means and objects of addiction: technology, the internet, and gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(4), p. 461-469.
Shah, D. & Afzaal, M. (2004). The examination Board as Educational Change Agent: The Influence of Question choice on selective study. Paper presented at 30th annual IAEA Conference. Philadelphia, United States of America.
Stahl, R. J & Murphy, G. T. (1981). The domain of cognition: An alternative to Bloom’s Cognitive domain within the framework of an information processing model. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED208511).
Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, C.A., Davidson, L.J., Evans, J. L., & Hansen, M.A. (2001). Validity evidence for using a general critical thinking test to measure nursing students’ critical thinking. HolNursPrac, 15, 65-74. PMid:12120497
Tekin, S., & Ayas, A. (2002). The evaluation of the chemistry exam questions prepared by students taking secondary level chemistry course. Proceedings of the fifth National Science and Math Teaching Conference. Ankara: METU
Touchton, J.G., Wertheimer, L.C., Cornfield, J.L. and Harrison, K.H. (1977). ‘Career planning and decision-making: A developmental approach to the classroom’, The Counseling Psychologist, 6(4), 42–47.
Turner P. (2005). Critical thinking in nursing education and practice as defined in the literature. Nurs Edu Perspectives.
Twibell, R., Ryan, M., & Hermiz M. (2005). Faculty perceptions of critical thinking in student clinical experiences. Jour of Nur Edu.44, p. 71 – 79. PMid:15719714.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (75). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walsh, C.M., & Seldomridge, L. A. (2006). Measuring critical thinking: One step forward, one step back. Nurse Educator, p.31-159-162.PMid:16855484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200607000-00008
Wang, W.-H. (2009). Chinese international students’ cross-cultural adjustment in the U.S.: Theroles of acculturation strategies, self-construal, perceived cultural distance, and English self-confidence (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/6588/wangw58087.pdf?sequence=2.
Wankat, P., & Oreovicz, F. S. (1993). Teaching engineering. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Widick, C.C. (1975). An Evaluation of developmental Instruction in a University Setting. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 2041A (University Microfilms No. 75-21, 101).
Williams, R. G. (1977). A behavioral typology of educational objectives for the cognitive domain. Educational Technology,17(6), 39-46.
Yüksel, S. (2007). The developments in cognitive domain and new taxonomies. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 5(3), 479-509
Zhang, L. F. (1999). A comparison of U.S. and Chinese university students’ cognitive development: The cross-cultural applicability of Perry’s theory.
Zhang, L. F. (2000). Are thinking styles and personality types related? Educational Psychology,20(3), 271–283. doi: 10.1080/713663742.
Zhang, L. F., & Hood, A. B. (1998). Cognitive development of students in China and USA: Opposite directions? Psychological Reports, 82(3c), 1251–1263.
Zhang, L. F., & Watkins, D. (2001). Cognitive development and student approaches to learning: An investigation of Perry’s theory with Chinese and U.S. university students. Higher Education, 41(3), 239–261. doi: 10.1023/A:1004151226395.
Zygmont, D. M., & Schaeffer, K. M. (2006). Assessing the critical thinking skills of faculty: What do the findings mean for nursing education? Nur Edu Perspectives. 27, 260-268.
