Estudios metateóricos en la historia de las doctrinas jurídicas y políticas: potencial heurístico.

Evgenii A. Apolskii; Andrei Y. Mordovtsev; Alexey Yu. Mamychev; Tatiana V. Mordovtseva.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v28i1.1670

Evgenii A. Apolskii Rostov Institute (branch) of the All- Russian State University of Justice
Andrei Y. Mordovtsev Department of Theory and History of Russian and Foreign Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Rostov Institute (branch) of All- Russian State University of Justice. (Russia, Vladivostok).
Alexey Yu. Mamychev Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service; Far Eastern Federal University
Tatiana V. Mordovtseva. Department of Humanities, Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics, (Russia, Taganrog),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v28i1.1670

Palabras clave: doctrina jurídica, reflexión científica, metateoría jurídica, enfoque metateórico, enfoque de sistema

Resumen

Este artículo aborda una herramienta tan importante en la investigación jurídica moderna como el enfoque metateórico. Los autores analizan la naturaleza y las perspectivas de utilizar este método en toda la gama de trabajos de investigación en derecho. El artículo concluye que el resultado de una aplicación competente de herramientas metateóricas es la capacidad de llevar a cabo un análisis sistemático de estudios jurídicos, lo que permite alcanzar el nivel de su implementación práctica en el proceso de desarrollo de políticas jurídicas y construcción del estado, como así como usar un nivel interdisciplinario de comprensión de los problemas de génesis y desarrollo legal.

Citas

Akopov, S.V. (2015). Transnational model of identification of individuals with macropolitical communities: metatheoretical analysis. Author’s abstract, Ph.D. Politics. - St.P.

Alekseev, P.V., & Panin, A.V. (1991). Theory of knowledge and dialectics. - M.: Vysshaia shkola, - 382 p.

Bazhanov, V.A. (2002). Reflection in modern science. Reflexive processes and control, 2(2), 73- 89.

Cohen, (1935). Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach. Columbia Law Review, 6, XXXV.

Deviatko, I.F. (2003). Meta-theoretical analysis of sociological theories of activity and practical rationality. ...Author’s abstract, Ph.D. Sociology. - M.

Hart, H.L.A. (2001). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford Clarendon Press New York Oxford University Press.

History of political and legal doctrines: a textbook / Chief Ed. V.V. Lazarev. - 3rd ed., revised and extended. - M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2016.

Hubbard, F.P. (1976). "One Man's Theory...": A Metatheoretical Analysis of H.L.A. Hart's Model of Law. Maryland Law Review, 36, p. 39.

Iakovleva, L.I. (2009). Meta-theoretical level of scientific knowledge and its reflecting concepts. Essays on the history and philosophy of science, 1, 272-294.

Ignatov, A.A. (2011). Meta-theoretical approach to the analysis of consciousness: based on the works by M.K. Mamardashvili: Author’s abstract, Ph.D. Philosophy. - Rostov-on-Don.

Kerimov, D.A. (2001). Methodology of law (subject, functions, problems of the philosophy of law). - 2nd ed. - M.: Avanta+.

Korkunov, N.M. (2004). Lectures on the general theory of law / N.M. Korkunov; auth. foreword I.Iu. Kozlikhin; Legal Center Association. - 2 ed., [Reprint]. - St.P.: Legal Center Press.

Lebedev, S.A. (2017). Paradigms of the methodology of science. Bulletin of M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Philosophy, 3(07), 94-102.

Lebedev, S.A. (2017). The structure of scientific rationality. Problems of Philosophy, 5, 66-79.

Musaelian, L.A. (2016). On the ontological foundations of law: a philosophical analysis of the problem. Bulletin of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology, 1(25), 13-22.

Ovchinnikov, A.I. (2017). The key problems of the philosophy of law and its place in legal science. North Caucasian Legal Journal, 1, 57-64.

Protasov, V.N. (1991). Basics of general legal procedural theory. - M.: Legal literature.

Protasov, V.N. (2009). Some questions of legal metatheory. State and law, 11, 85-89.

Ritzer, J. (2002). Modern sociological theories. 5th ed. - St.P.: Piter.