Meta-Theoretical Studies in the History of Legal and Political Doctrines: Heuristic Potential.
Abstract
This article discusses such an important tool in modern legal research as the meta-theoretical approach. The authors analyze the nature and prospects of using this method in the whole range of research work in law. The article concludes that the result of a competent application of metatheoretical tools is the ability to carry out a systematic analysis of legal studies, allowing to reach the level of their practical implementation in the process of developing legal policy and state-building, as well as use an interdisciplinary level of understanding of the problems of legal genesis and development.
References
Akopov, S.V. (2015). Transnational model of identification of individuals with macropolitical communities: metatheoretical analysis. Author’s abstract, Ph.D. Politics. - St.P.
Alekseev, P.V., & Panin, A.V. (1991). Theory of knowledge and dialectics. - M.: Vysshaia shkola, - 382 p.
Bazhanov, V.A. (2002). Reflection in modern science. Reflexive processes and control, 2(2), 73- 89.
Cohen, (1935). Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach. Columbia Law Review, 6, XXXV.
Deviatko, I.F. (2003). Meta-theoretical analysis of sociological theories of activity and practical rationality. ...Author’s abstract, Ph.D. Sociology. - M.
Hart, H.L.A. (2001). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford Clarendon Press New York Oxford University Press.
History of political and legal doctrines: a textbook / Chief Ed. V.V. Lazarev. - 3rd ed., revised and extended. - M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2016.
Hubbard, F.P. (1976). "One Man's Theory...": A Metatheoretical Analysis of H.L.A. Hart's Model of Law. Maryland Law Review, 36, p. 39.
Iakovleva, L.I. (2009). Meta-theoretical level of scientific knowledge and its reflecting concepts. Essays on the history and philosophy of science, 1, 272-294.
Ignatov, A.A. (2011). Meta-theoretical approach to the analysis of consciousness: based on the works by M.K. Mamardashvili: Author’s abstract, Ph.D. Philosophy. - Rostov-on-Don.
Kerimov, D.A. (2001). Methodology of law (subject, functions, problems of the philosophy of law). - 2nd ed. - M.: Avanta+.
Korkunov, N.M. (2004). Lectures on the general theory of law / N.M. Korkunov; auth. foreword I.Iu. Kozlikhin; Legal Center Association. - 2 ed., [Reprint]. - St.P.: Legal Center Press.
Lebedev, S.A. (2017). Paradigms of the methodology of science. Bulletin of M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Philosophy, 3(07), 94-102.
Lebedev, S.A. (2017). The structure of scientific rationality. Problems of Philosophy, 5, 66-79.
Musaelian, L.A. (2016). On the ontological foundations of law: a philosophical analysis of the problem. Bulletin of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology, 1(25), 13-22.
Ovchinnikov, A.I. (2017). The key problems of the philosophy of law and its place in legal science. North Caucasian Legal Journal, 1, 57-64.
Protasov, V.N. (1991). Basics of general legal procedural theory. - M.: Legal literature.
Protasov, V.N. (2009). Some questions of legal metatheory. State and law, 11, 85-89.
Ritzer, J. (2002). Modern sociological theories. 5th ed. - St.P.: Piter.
