Estudio de las actitudes de los estudiantes, miembros de la facultad y expertos en capacitación con respecto a los estándares de evaluación del desempeño educativo en los miembros de la facultad de la universidad.
Resumen
El propósito de este documento es examinar la actitud de los estudiantes, los docentes y los expertos en capacitación con respecto a los estándares de evaluación del desempeño educativo de los docentes universitarios. Para recopilar información, el cuestionario realizado por el investigador incluyó 20 preguntas, en forma de un espectro de 5 Likert, de trivial a crítico. Los resultados mostraron que los miembros de la facultad y los expertos en educación en tres áreas antes, durante y después de enseñar los estándares de evaluación del desempeño de los miembros de la facultad acreditados.
Citas
Abdul Samadi, Hamid Reza; Dalband, Mohsen: Davoodi, Puran Dokht; Bakhtiari, Behnush; Moghimbeigi Abbas, Ahmadi Motemayel, Fatemeh (2012). Comparing the results of self-evaluation of teachers and students’ evaluation from the educational performance of faculty members in the School of Dentistry, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Medical Sciences, Volume 12, Number 2, row 40, pp. 101-109.
AhmadyS,Taghavinia M,Rahmani H, Khabaz M(translator). [How to succeed at medical school:an essential guide to learning]. Evans D,Brown J(Author). Qom:hagh yavaran; 2009. [Persian]
Basow, S.A. (2000). Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in student’ choices. Sex Roles (pp.417).
Bazargan, Abass (2001). Educational Evaluation. Tehran: Publication side.
Centra, J.A.; & Gaubatz, N.B. (2000).Is there gender bias in student evaluation of teaching? Journal of Higher Education, (pp.17-33)
Dadman Mitra; Yamani, Nikoo, Changiz, Tahere, Mousavi, Arefeh (2014). The scholarship of faculty members in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2012-2009. Journal of Medical Sciences, Volume 14, Issue 6.
Ejtehadi M. [Tahlili bar tavanmandiha va kastihaye nezame amouzeshe ali]. Research and planning in higher education; 1998; (17): 33-58. [Persian][Cited 30 August 2014] available from:http://www. noormags. com/view/fa/articlepage/42425
Griffin B.W. (2002). Instructor Reputation and student Ratings of Instruction. Contemporary Educational Pschology. (pp.534-552)
Hassett M.F. (2000). What Markes A Good Teacher? http://www.Sabes.org/resources/adventures/vol12/12hassett.htm
Isfahan university of medical sciences. [Fehrest kooli sharh vazayef asatide daneshgah va mizan arzeshe anha]. Isfahan: educational development center; 2007. [Persian]
Mahdavi, Sakine; Zare, Soudabeh; Naimi, Nayere (2014). Comparative evaluation of faculty members’ teaching by students with their self-assessment. Research in Medical Education, Volume 6, Number 2, pp. 51-58.
Nowell, Clifford; Gale, Lewis R.; Handley, Bruce (2010). Assessing faculty performance using student evaluations of teaching in an uncontrolled setting. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 35, No. 4
Rector, jeff (2009). faculty perception of faculty evaluation programs at selected private colleges/universities in the southeast united states. dissertation presented in the university of Tennesse,Chattanooga.
Robinson Wolf Z. (2004). Strengths and Weaknesses of Faculty teaching Performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing student: a descriptive study. Journal of Professional Nursing.(pp.118-128).
Rueda V.C. (1989). Student Evaluation of the professor’s performance and its effects on teaching effectiveness May- Jun(pp.151-159).
Sanjari Karahroudi, Ahmad Reza (1994). Investigating the relation between the management MA students' attitudes of Air University School of Management faculty about the faculty members and the evaluation of faculty members by students. Master's thesis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of Tehran.
Seif AA. (2004). Andazegiri, Sanjesh va arzeshyabye amoozeshi. 4th ed. Tehran: Doran.
Seldin, P. (1993). The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Storey C. Innovation in services. Aust marketing J. 2002;10(1):59-70.
