Apoyo docente y paterno en el impulso femenino por carreras STEM. Validación psicométrica de una escala.
Resumen
El papel de los padres y profesores es relevante en el impulso de las mujeres para la selección de carreras STEM. El objetivo del estudio fue la determinación de las propiedades psicométricas de una escala de medición para la estimación de las perspectivas de las estudiantes sobre el apoyo de padres y profesores en el fomento por carreras en ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería o matemáticas en instituciones de educación media superior en zonas rurales. Se desarrolló un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio, y se estimaron los principales indicadores de fiabilidad y validez. Se concluye que el modelo propuesto cumple con los atributos psicométricos necesarios para ser empleado en el estudio de este fenómeno en el contexto para el cual fue desarrollado.
Citas
Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents’ decision making. Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.5.311-323
Avendaño Rodríguez, K. C., Magaña Medina, D. E., & Flores Crespo, P. (2020). Influencia familiar en la elección de carreras STEM (Ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas) en estudiantes de bachillerato. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(2), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.366311
Avendaño-Rodríguez, K. C., Magaña-Medina, D. E., & Aguilar-Morales, N. (2017). Análisis factorial exploratorio del cuestionario interés por estudios universitarios en áreas STEM (I- STEM). Revista de Análisis Cuantitativo y Estadístico, 4(13), 54–68. https://www.ecorfan.org/bolivia/researchjournals/Analisis_Cuantitativo_y_Estadistico/vol4num13/Revista_de_Analisis_Cuantitativo_y_Estadistico_V4_N13_7.pdf
Bonder, G. (2017). Infancia, Ciencia y Tecnología: un análisis de género desde el entorno familiar, educativo y cultural. Cátedra Regional UNESCO Mujer ciencia y Tecnología en América Latina - FLACSO Argentina con la Asociación Civil Chicos.net y con el apoyo de Disney Latinoamérica. http://www.catunescomujer.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/STEM.pdf
Cacciotti, G., Hayton, J. C., Mitchell, J. R., & Giazitzoglu, A. (2016). A reconceptualization of fear of failure in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(3), 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.02.002
Castro, M., Expósito-casas, E., López-Martín, E., & Lizasoain, L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement : A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002
Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2019). The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(10), 4182– 4187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810862116
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. En G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Methodology for business and management. Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2014). Student perceptions of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) content and careers. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046
Dulce-Salcedo, O. V., Maldonado, D., & Sánchez, F. (2022). Is the proportion of female STEM teachers in secondary education related to women’s enrollment in tertiary education STEM programs? International Journal of Educational Development, 91(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102591
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399– 412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
El-Emadi, A. A., Said, Z., & Friesen, H. L. (2019). Teaching style differences between male and female science teachers in Qatari schools: Possible impact on student achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109236
Fernández-García, C. M., Torío-López, S., García-Pérez, O., & Inda-Caro, M. (2019). Apoyo parental, creencias de autoeficacia, resultados esperados e intereses STEAM.pdf. Universitas Psychologica, 18(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-2.ps se
Gaskin, J., James, M., and Lim, J. (2019). Master Validity Tool, [AMOS Plugin]. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/
Goreth, S., & Vollmer, C. (2023). Gender does not make the difference: interest in STEM by gender is fully mediated by technical socialization and degree program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(4), 1675–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09772-z
Gülhan, F. (2023). Parental Involvement in STEM Education: A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/13506
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hernández-Mena, V., Magaña-Medina, D. E., & Avendaño, K. C. (2018). STEM disciplines: Detonating for national and regional economic development. Journal-International Economy, 2(3), 19–29. http://www.rinoe.org/taiwan/Journal_International_Economy/vol2num3/Journal_International_Economy_V2_N3_3.pdf
Hite, R. L., & Spott, J. L. (2022). Improving Parents’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Girls’ STEM Activities and Interests Before and After an Informal STEM Intervention. The Journal of STEM Outreach, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v5i1.01
Hoferichter, F., & Raufelder, D. (2019). Mothers and Fathers—Who Matters for STEM Performance? Gender-Specific Associations Between STEM Performance, Parental Pressure, and Support During Adolescence. Frontiers in Education, 4(March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00014
Hoyle, R. H. (2023). Handbook of structural equation modeling. Guilford press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Handbook-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rick-Hoyle/9781462544646
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
IBM (2017). SPSS Statistics (Versión 25) [Computer software].
IBM (2019). SPSS Amos (Versión 26) [Computer software].
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [INEGI]. (2023). Marco geoestadístico - Catálogo único de claves de áreas geoestadísticas estatales, municipales y localidades. Sistema de Consultas. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/ageeml/
JASP Team (2023). JASP (Version 0.18.1) [Computer software].
Jiménez-León, R., Magaña-Medina, D. E., & Aquino-Zúñiga, S. P. (2021). Gestión de tendencias STEM en educación superior y su impacto en la industria 4.0. Journal of the Academy, 5, 99–121. https://doi.org/10.47058/joa5.7
Kantamneni, N., McCain, M. R. C., Shada, N., Hellwege, M. A., & Tate, J. (2018). Contextual Factors in the Career Development of Prospective First-Generation College Students: An Application of Social Cognitive Career Theory. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716680048
King, M. F., & Bruner, G. C. (2000). Social Desirability Bias : A Neglected Aspect of Validity Testing Social Desirability Bias : A Neglected Aspect of Validity Testing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17
Lai, K. (2020). Fit difference between nonnested models given categorical data: measures and estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1763802
Ledesma, R. (2008). Introducción al Bootstrap. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p051
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (1994). Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. https://doi.org/0001-8791/94
Littlewood, H. F., & Bernal, E. R. (2014). Mi primer modelamiento de ecuaciones estructurales, (2da ed.). Autor.
Magaña, D., Vázquez, J. M., & Aguilar, N. (2013). Desarrollo de una escala para medir el interés en la formación Temprana en Investigación. Una muestra en estudiantes universitarios. XVII Congreso Internacional en Ciencias Administrativas, 1–30. https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://gitmexico.com/acacia/busqueda/pdf/456.pdf
Montgomery, C., & Fernández-Cárdenas, J. M. (2018). Teaching STEM education through dialogue and transformative learning: global significance and local interactions in Mexico and the UK. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422606
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEM mania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20– 27. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/51616/STEMmania.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Sattari, N., & Sandefur, R. L. (2019). Gender in academic STEM: A focus on men faculty. Gender, Work and Organization, 26(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12249
Saw, G. & Agger, C. (2021). STEM pathways of rural and small-town students: Opportunities to learn, aspirations, preparation, and college enrollment. Educational Researcher, 50(9), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211027528
Sheldon, S. B. (2002). Parents’ Social Networks and Beliefs as Predictors of Parent Involvement. The Elementary School Journal, 102(4), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/499705
Shin, S., Ha, M., & Lee, J.-K. (2016). The Development and Validation of Instrument for Measuring High School Students’ STEM Career Motivation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0075
Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021). Men, women, and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? European Journal of Personality, 35(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890207020962326
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). United Nations Educational Sicentific, and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479
United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. En United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2015.1038080
Urrutia, M., Barrio, S., Gutiérrez, M., & Mayorga, M. (2015). Métodos óptimos para determinar validez de contenido. Revista Cubana de Educación Medica Superior, 28(3), 547–558. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ems/v28n3/ems14314.pdf
Valdés-Cuervo, A. A., García-Vázquez, F., Torres-Acuña, G. M., Urías-Murrieta, M., & Grijalva- Quiñonez, C. S. (2019). Medición en Investigación Educativa con Apoyo del SPSS y el AMOS. Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora.
Vázquez, E. (2021). Influencias de las habilidades sociales, la autoeficacia y estereotipos de género en el interés por elección de carreras CTIM. (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco.
Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana en Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625–627. https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.13110020813
West, S., Wu, W., Mc Neish, D., & Savord, A. (2023). Model fit structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Eds.). Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 184-205). Guilford press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Handbook-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rick-Hoyle/9781462544646
Williams, B., & Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Primary of Emergency Health Care, 8(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.8.3.93
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’ s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
Zhou, L., Chhikara, A., Oudghiri, S., Osei-Tutu, A. A. Z., & Dwomoh, R. K. (2023). Teachers’ Perceptions on Women in STEM: Breaking the Stereotypes. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.61403/2158-6594.1492
Zucker, T. A., Montroy, J., Master, A., Assel, M., McCallum, C., & Yeomans-Maldonado, G. (2021). Expectancy-value theory & preschool parental involvement in informal STEM learning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101320
