Tecnologías emergentes para la educación universitaria: un análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica en Latinoamérica.

  • Adán Hugo Silva Lavín Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
  • Carolina Martínez Molano Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
  • Francisco Isaí Morales Sáenz Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
Palabras clave: análisis bibliométrico, educación superior, Latinoamérica, tecnologías

Resumen

Este estudio presenta un análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica latinoamericana en tecnologías emergentes para educación universitaria (2019-2025). Mediante búsqueda sistemática en Web of Science, se analizaron 1,554 documentos con software R y bibliometrix. Los resultados muestran crecimiento exponencial del 751.1% en producción científica regional con México y Brasil como líderes (350 y 300 publicaciones respectivamente). El Tecnológico de Monterrey destaca como institución más productiva (294 publicaciones). El análisis identifica clusters temáticos, donde las tecnologías más estudiadas incluyen inteligencia artificial, realidad aumentada, gamificación y mobile learning. Se concluye que Latinoamérica se consolidó como región emergente significativa en investigación de tecnologías educativas, con marcos conceptuales distintivos centrados en el estudiante.

Citas

Akpan, I. J., Offodile, O. F., Akpanobong, A. C., & Kobara, Y. M. (2024). A comparative analysis of virtual education technology, e-learning systems research advances, and digital divide in the global south. Informatics, 11(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030053

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2523-2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3

Criollo, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, A., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile Learning Technologies for Education: Benefits and Pending Issues. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111

Díaz-García, V., Montero-Navarro, A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, J., & Gallego, R. (2022). Digitalization and digital transformation in higher education: A bibliometric analysisUpdated. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081595

Djeki, E., Dégila, J., Bondiombouy, C., & Alhassan, M. H. (2022). E-learning bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2020. Journal of Computers in Education, 9, 727-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00218-4

Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Jing, Y., Wang, C., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Yu, T., & Shadiev, R. (2024). Bibliometric mapping techniques in educational technology research: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9283-9311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12178-6

Ma, H., & Ismail, L. (2025). Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of digital competence in education. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 12, 185. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04401-1

Márquez, J. E., Domínguez, C. A., & Rodríguez, C. A. (2020). Virtual World as a Resource for Hybrid Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(15), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i15.13025

Michel-Villarreal, R., Villalta-Perdomo, E., Salina-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856

Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Navarro- Tuch, S. A., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278

Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014-1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065

Rodríguez, C., Sanz, M., & García, S. (2019). Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 9(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030169

Romero-Rodríguez, J., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Education Research, 12, 323-339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458

Smiderles, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Pecanha, J. A., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environment, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x

Publicado
2026-01-01