Dinámicas de métodos de investigación y su influencia en Neoinstitucionalismo.

Palabras clave: métodos de investigación, neoinstitucionalismo, innovación, educación 4.0, gestión estratégica

Resumen

Se estudia el uso de métodos de investigación en el neoinstitucionalismo (NIS). El objetivo general es analizar los métodos de investigación más empleados en el NIS para proponer un modelo teórico-práctico. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura (RSL) utilizando la base de datos Scopus, con una muestra final de 37 artículos. Los resultados indican una preferencia por los enfoques cualitativos e interpretativos, los estudios de caso longitudinales y el análisis narrativo; asimismo, se identifica una tendencia hacia la optimización mediante algoritmos, métodos mixtos y análisis formal de texto (incrustación de palabras, modelado de tópicos) para estudios a gran escala. Se propone un modelo multinivel (macro-micro) que integra la riqueza interpretativa con el poder explicativo de los métodos computacionales.

Citas

Akıncıoğlu, M. (2025). Reforming EMI in higher education: The EMI ProF as a political normative framework for policy, quality, and professionalisation. International Journal of Educational Development, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103276

Alamaa, L., Hall, P., y Löfgren, K. (2025). Managers, Professionals, or Public Servants? Organizational Professionals in the Public Sector as Hybrid Professionals. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70000

Alexander, T. (2024). Social models as dynamic theories: how to improve the impact of social and political sciences. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1443388

Andersson, T., y Liff, R. (2018). Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joy001

Aurini, J., LaCroix, E. ., Iafolla, V., Brisbane, M., y Dreesha, M. (2025). Qualitative Student Mobility Research in Canada: Existing Contributions and Scholarly Recommendations. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 55(2), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v1i1.190107

Bocken, N., y Coffay, M. (2025). Institutionalization of circular business models in the United States. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70115

Brown, A. D., and S. Toyoki. 2013. Identity Work and Legitimacy. Organisation Studies 34, no. 7: 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612467158

Buendía, A., y Rivera, D. (2024). The myth of free education in Mexican higher education: Approaches to understanding a policy change. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.8501

Chindondondo, S., y Reddy, C. D. (2025). Social Sustainability Practice: The Interplay between State and Community Logics. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06207-2

Christensen, M. K., Pedersen, I. M., y Wichmann-Hansen, G. (2024). Teaching capital– a sociological analysis of medical educator portfolios for promotion. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 29(5), 1769–1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10333-3

Claassen, C. H., Bidet, E., Jeong, B. G., Kim, J., y Choi, Y. (2025). Intersecting Identities: Exploring Worker-Member Perspectives on Government-Certified Worker-Run Social Cooperatives in South Korea. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 16(3), 451–511. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2023-0115

Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., y Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088

de Jong, S., y Kantimm, W. (2024). Do professional staff in universities really challenge academic norms? A perspective from the Netherlands. Higher Education, 88(6), 2165–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01209-x

DiMaggio, P. J., y Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Dodge, J., Metze, T. Approaches to policy framing: deepening a conversation across perspectives. Policy Sci 57, 221–256 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09534-9

Ehwi, R. J., Asante, L. A., y Gavu, E. K. (2024). Understanding the norms and difficulties with advance rent payments in Ghana. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 16(1), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2024.2350747

Elsbach, K., and R. Sutton. 1992. Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy Through Illegitimate Actions: A Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories. Academy of Management Journal 35: 699–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/256313

Eseonu, T. (2025). Conceptualising Anti-Racist Institutionalism. Social Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13116

Greenwood, Royston and Raynard, Mia and Kodeih, Farah and Micelotta, Evelyn and Lounsbury, Michael, Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses (May 17, 2010). The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 5, No. 1, June 2011, 317-371, University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-31, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2266644

Hellquist, A., Balfors, B., y Sondal, J. (2025). Projectification mediates between experimental and bureaucratic institutional logics in urban sustainability planning. Planning Practice and Research, 40(3), 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2025.2472113

Hollingsworth, A., y Valler, D. (2025). Strategy and dynamics in sub-regional governance and planning: Lessons from Eastern England 2010 to 2020. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 43(5), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241297477

Holubek, V. (2025). Rethinking the Provider–Receiver Dichotomy in Transnational Higher Education. European Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2025.2566136

Ibarra, H., y Barbulescu, R. (2010). Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.45577925

Jepperson, Ronald L. (1999). “Instituciones, efectos institucionales e institucio-nalismo”, en Powell y DiMaggio (comps.), El nuevo institucionalismo en el análisis organizacional, México, FCE-CNCPAP- UAEM, pp. 193, 215. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/7/3396/5.pdf https://gc.scalahed.com/recursos/files/r161r/w24483w/NuevoInstituAnalisOrganisaOtrosS3.pdf

Kuai, J. (2024). Unravelling Copyright Dilemma of AI-Generated News and Its Implications for the Institution of Journalism: The Cases of US, EU, and China. New Media and Society, 26(9), 5150–5168. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241251798

Lackner, E. J. (2024). Legitimising quality work in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(7), 1584–1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2262494

Lacroix, E. (2024). Meso-Foundations of Experiential Education in Ontario Universities: A Content Analysis of the Province’s Strategic Mandate Agreements. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. Revue Canadienne d’enseignement Supérieur, 54(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.vi.190053

Lawrence, Thomas & Suddaby, Roy Robert (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work (June 16, 2006). In Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, Thomas B. Lawrence y Walter R. Nord (Eds.) Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd Edition: 215-254. London: Sage, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3197577

Leonardi, P. M., y Barley, S. R. (2010). What’s under construction Here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing.Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654160

Lopes, M., Santos, C., Ferreira, V., Monteiro, R., y Vieira, C. C. (2024). The Transformative Potential of Gender Equality Plans to Expand Women’s, Gender, and Feminist Studies in Higher Education: Grounds for Vigilant Optimism. Education Sciences, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080889

Mair, J., Mayer, J., y Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580007

Makris, I., Apostolopoulos, S., Giannopoulos, V., Dimitrakopoulos, P., y Charalampakis, P. (2025). The Impact of Formal and Informal Institutional Elements on Land Mobility Within Rural Greece. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104412

Maya Mendoza, J., Llanos, L. F., y Beltrán Del Río, C. V. (2024). Organizational changes triggered by certification to ISO 9000 certification. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 29(12), 1495–1513. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.29.e12.38

Meyer, J., y Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Moldashev, K., Sahimbekov, B., y Kozhakhmet, S. (2025). The institutional logics of research commercialisation: Reform, misalignment, and hybridisation. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102000

Nazir, S., y Doni, F. (2024). Nexus of circular economy R0 to R9 principles in integrated reporting: Insights from a multiple case study comparison. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4058–4085. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3684

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University. https://epistemh.pbworks.com/f/8.%20Institutions__Institutional_Change_and_Economic_Performance.pdf

O’Connor, P. (2025). Athena SWAN Silver Applications and Gender Equality Action Plans: A Driving Force in Irish Higher Education or Genderwashing? Gender, Work and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70012

Park, H., Sam, M. P., y Jackson, S. J. (2024). The policy instrument mix in South Korea: precursor to maltreatment in sport. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 16(4), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2024.2342393

Park, H., Sam, M. P., y Jackson, S. J. (2025). Entrenched maltreatment in sport: Unintended consequences of the mix of practices and narratives. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 60(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902241264032

Pesterfield, C., y Rogerson, M. (2024). Institutional Logics in the UK Construction Industry’s Response to Modern Slavery Risk: Complementarity and Conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 191(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05455-4

Poschmann, P. (2025). Capturing institutional logics and the construction of digital technologies: A macro-discursive perspective using formal text analysis methods. Information and Organization, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100598

Powell W. W., y DiMaggio, Paul, comp. El nuevo institucionalismo en el análisis organizacional. México, D. F: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública. https://www.fcede.es/site/es/libros/detalles.aspx?id_libro=20

Purdon, M., y Byakagaba, P. (2025). Mapping the Ontology and Epistemology of Research Into Forest Carbon Offsetting in Developing Countries. Environmental Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70015

Sawang, S., Ng, P. Y., Kivits, R. A., Dsilva, J., y Locke, J. (2024). Examining the influence of customers, suppliers, and regulators on environmental practices of SMEs: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6533–6546. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3831

Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Sage. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-management-2014-2-page-136?lang=en

Scott, W. R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests and Identities. Management Sage Publications. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Institutions_and_Organizations.html?id=kWb-AAAAQBAJyredir_esc=y

Siefkes, M., Hamer, A. L., Haaland, G., y Bjørgum, Ø. (2024). Profit first, environmental impact second? Investigating hybrid institutional logics in venture capital investment approaches. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 7922–7941. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3902

Sinha, M., y Gasper, D. (2010). How can power discourses be changed? Contrasting the ‘daughter deficit’s policy of the Delhi government with Gandhi and King’s transformational reframing. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619717. Disponible en: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/19672/wp%20493.pdf

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Sage Publications Ltd. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07735-017

Stenvall-Virtanen, S. 2025. Strategy as Practice—Multilevel Institutional Work to Induce Change in Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly 79, no. 4: e70047. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70047.

Suchman, M. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20: 571–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Sun, J. C., Pifer, M. J., Turner, H. A., y Pratt, T. L. (2025). The heightened contributory partnership phenomenon: Legitimacy-seeking goals and behaviors within ROTC. Innovative Higher Education, 50(3), 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09766-w

Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., y Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Emerging Trends In The Social And Behavioral Sciences. https://emergingtrends.stanford.edu/files/original/6744255f04ae771e37313a8a6ea39d4d0a62cb23.pdf

Thornton, P. H., y Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, y R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4

Thune, T., y Borlaug, S. B. (2025). Becoming Similar, but Drifting Apart: Partnerships Between Universities and Public Research Organizations. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09563-x

Villers, S., Dhalla, R., y Oberholzer, J. (2024). Dying to Understand How Electronic Word of Mouth Legitimates Sustainable Innovations in Stigmatized Markets. Journal of Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705241248238

Vivier, E., Robinson, B., Jenkins, L., y Smit, A. (2024). Institutional logics and relational shifts: permeating hierarchies and silos in the healthcare sector. Public Management Review, 26(10), 2943–2965. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2299929

Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875

Publicado
2026-05-01