El concepto de conveniencia en el sistema de procesamiento en irán y el reino unido.

Mehdi Sheidaeian; Mahdi Taville; Seyyed Mahmoud Mir Khalili; Shahrdad Darabi.

Mehdi Sheidaeian Faculty of Law, Department of Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi Taville Islamic Azad University of Qom.
Seyyed Mahmoud Mir Khalili Faculty of Law, Department of Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Iran.
Shahrdad Darabi.

Palabras clave: derecho, persecución, sanción, fiscal, conveniencia

Resumen

En este artículo, el autor intenta investigar lo que es conveniente considerando la conveniencia del fiscal, la conveniencia del individuo o la comunidad, y sobre la asunción de los intereses del individuo. ¿Deben considerarse los intereses del demandado o el interés de la víctima (demandante)? Además, este documento examina qué autoridad y la autoridad que identifica el fiscal como autoridad judicial o judicial (oficina del fiscal); sin embargo, ¿es digno de los legisladores en los sistemas legales que utilizan este sistema de enjuiciamiento criminal? Para evitar la tiranía del poder judicial y la verificabilidad de la decisión tomada en los textos legales, deben especificar personalmente el material.

Citas

Akhundi, M. (1995). Criminal Procedure. Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Fourth Edition, 2.

Alamardi, J. (1999). The Relationship Between Public Expediency and Individual Freedom. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, 44.

Amid Zanjani, A. A., & Musa Zadeh, I. (2009). The Laws of Political Jurisprudence. Majd Publications, First Edition.

Bagherinejad, Z. (2015). Principles of Criminal Procedure, Khorsandi, First Edition.

Barry, B. (1977). The public interest " in political philosophy, ed. BYA. Quinton, london: oup.

Bayat Komitki, M. (2006). Evaluation of the concept of public interest in the constitutional and constitutional laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Master's thesis, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University.

Bushehri, J. (2008). Criminal Law (Principles and Issues), Public Joint Stock Company, Second Edition.

Dehdarzadeh, F. (2013). Legal cases of criminal prosecution in Iran and the United Kingdom, Behnamy, First Edition.

Eftekhari, A. (1998). Pascalat, Imam Sadegh (AS) publication, first edition.

Farajiha Ghazvini, M. (2002). Police Protection to Victims of Crime. Deep and Deep Publications.

Haji Deh Abadi, M. A., Salehi, M. Kh., & Moradi Hassan Abad, M. (2017). The Situation in pursuing in the Iranian Penal System. The Criminal Law Doctrines, Razavi University of Science, 13.

Imami, M., & Sadeghi, M. H. (1998). Expediency in Criminal Proceedings. Legal Journal of Justice.

Jamshidi, A. & Nourian, A. (2013). Suitability of Criminal Persecution; Concepts, Fundamentals and Effects in Iranian and English Law. Criminal Law Research, Second Year, 3.

Kahaki, F., & Jenaabadi, H. (2014). Psychological Well-being and Social Support for Male and Female Nurses in Zahedan city: a Comparative Study. . UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 2(2), 14-20.

Katouzian, N. (2001). Philosophy of Law (Definition and Nature of Rights), Volume One, Public Joint Stock Company, Second Edition.

Khazani, M. (1998). Legal System and Positioning System or Suitability of Prosecution, Proceedings, Treasure and Knowledge Library. First Edition.

Miri, S. R. (2011). Criminal Investigation, Majd Publications, First Edition.

Neglect, J. F. (2005). Sociological Revenue on the Development of Modern Government, Behzad Bashi's Translation, Knowledge Publishing.

Nikolaeva, A. D., & Savvinov, V. M. (2016). Multi-ethnic school in the Russian Federation: the Preconditions of Formation and Development (a case study of a national region). International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(10), 3405-3414.

Parandjan, H. A. M., Milani, A. B. A., Najafi, H. A. S., & Khosravi, A. (2014). Organizational Development and its Assessment Indexes of Education. CT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 2(2), 12-18.

Ragheb Isfahani, H. (1991). Movatif of the Qur'anic words of the Quran, Al-Takhad al-Arabi.

Rasekh, M. (2016). Hagh and Mozhlat, Publishing Ney, Fourth Edition.

Sadeghi, M. H. (2005). Conflict of Extremism and Victims’ Rights in Islamic Penal Law. Modares Journal of Humanities, 40.

Shidayan, M. (2009). Analysis of the Principle of Possession of Criminal Persecution and its Position in Iran's and Islam's Criminal Law. Ph.D., Tehran University, Campus of Qom.

Spencer, J. R. (2007). Criminal Procedure in the United Kingdom, translated by Mohammad Reza Goodarzi and Leila Moghadadi, Forest Publishing.