Proposal for modelling and analysis of science and technology indicators.

  • Glenda Cecibel Intriago Alcívar Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Ecuador.
  • Dinora Alexandra Carpio Vera Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Ecuador.
  • Alex Vladimir Toapanta Suntaxi Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo, Ecuador.
  • Augusto Franklin Mendiburu Rojas. Universidad Privada del Norte, Perú.
Keywords: Science a technology indicator, fuzzy cognitive maps, causals relations

Abstract

Decision making in science and technology is a complex task due to the multiple intervening factors. In the present paper, a methodology for science and technology indicator analysis for organizational decision-making purpose is presented. This methodology is based on the modeling of causal relations among indicators through fuzzy cognitive maps and its statics analysis. For static analysis a node centrality composite indicator based on is proposed. The methodology shows significant results for the application of fuzzy cognitive maps in science and technology decision making and policy conception.

References

Amirkhani, A., Papageorgiou, E. I., Mohseni, A., & Mosavi, M. R. (2017). A review of fuzzy cognitive maps in medicine: Taxonomy, methods, and applications. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 142, pp.129-145.

Axelrod, R. (2015). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites: Princeton university press.

Brandes, U., Borgatti, S. P., & Freeman, L. C. (2016). Maintaining the duality of closeness and betweenness centrality. Social Networks, Vol.44, pp.153-159.

Chytas, P., Glykas, M., & Valiris, G. (2011). A proactive balanced scorecard. International Journal of Information Management, 31(5), pp.460-468.

González Ortega, R., Leyva Vázquez, M., AlcioneSganderla Figueiredo, J. & Guijarro-Rodríguez, A. (2018). Sinos River basin social-environmental prospective assessment of water quality management using fuzzy cognitive maps and neutrosophic AHP-TOPSIS. Neutrosophic Sets & Systems, Vol.23.

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). El Manifiesto de Leiden sobre indicadores de investigación. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-CTS, 10(29), pp.275-280.

Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(1), pp.65-75.

Leyva-Vázquez, M., Pérez-Teruel, K., Febles-Estrada, A., & Gulín-González, J. (2013). Modelo para el análisis de escenarios basado en mapas cognitivos difusos: estudio de caso en software biomédico. Ingeniería y Universidad, 17(2), pp.373-390.

Maridueña Arroyave, M.R., Leyva Vazquez, M., & Flebes Estrada, A. (2016). Modelado y análisis de indicadores de ciencia y tecnología mediante mapas cognitivos difusos. Ciencias de la Información, 47(1), pp.17-24.

Osoba, O. & Kosko, B. (2019). Beyond DAGs: modeling causal feedback with fuzzy cognitive maps. arXiv. Recovered from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.11247.pdf

Ping, C. W. (2009). A methodology for constructing causal knowledge model from fuzzy cognitive map to bayesian belief network. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Chonnam National University.

Published
2019-11-01