Legal regulation of mortgage lending: the experience of Russia and foreign countries.

  • Gennadiy A. Borisov Belgorod State University. Russia
  • Liana R. Barashyan Institute of Service and Entrepreneurship (branch) of DSTU in Shakhty.
  • Ivan N. Kuksin Belgorod State University. Russia
  • Inna A. Yaroshchuk Belgorod State University. Russia
  • Natalya A. Zhukova. Belgorod State University. Russia
Keywords: mortgage law, mortgage lending, mortgage contract, legal relationships

Abstract

In this paper, authors carry out an analysis of regulation of legal relationships in the sphere of mortgage lending, based on studies of certain international legal acts, monographic publications and scientific publications. They analyze, in particular, the German mortgage lending system, elements of which are used in the development of the Russian mortgage system. The common features and peculiarities of mortgage lending in Germany and Russia are noted.

References

Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Arisetyawan, A., Suryadi, D., Herman, T., & Rahmat, C. (2014). Study of Ethnomathematics: A Lesson from The Baduy Culture. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(10), 1-8.

Barahal, S. (2008). Thinking about thinking: Pre-service teachers strengthen their thinking artfully. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 298-302.

Bondarenko S.S., Barashyan L.R., Goltsov V.B., Korobko K.I., Tychinin S.V. (2018). The Institute for Damage Prevention in the Civil Law of the Member States of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Revista Publicando. 5 # 14. (2). Pp. 822-829.

Budilov V.M. (2003). Mortgage law in Russia and Germany. Spb., 21 p. (In Russian).

Frenkel 'Eh. B. (2000). German Civil Code. Comparative legal study: study guide. M.: NORMA. 366 p. (In Russian)

Gallyamova, T.R. (2015). Improving the efficiency of tax control as a factor of financial security of the republic of Bashkortostan. Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Management, Recht: Probleme Der Wissenchaft Und Praxis / Sammelwerk der wissenschaftlichen artikel. Der wissenschaftliche redakteur: S.I. Drobjasko. Pp. 200-203.

Gursky K.H. (2001). 20 Probleme aus dem BGB. Das Eigentumer-Besitzer-Verhaltnis. 6.Aufl. Neuwied: Luchterhandverlag. 107 p.

Kobler G. (1999. Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte. 5. Aufl. - Munchen: Vahlen. 561 p.

Spring M. (2001). Geschaftsfahigkeit und Verfugungsberechtigung bei Grundstucksverfiigungen. Berlin: ESV. 166 p.

Stepanyuk A.V., Garmashev M.A., Peremyshlennikova I.N., Voronova O.N., Korolyova E.V. (2017). Contract freedom principle: a restrictive context. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC. April. Special Edition. Pp. 343-346.

Vasilevskaya L. Yu. (2004). The doctrine on property matters in German law: a monograph. M.: Statut. 538 p. (In Russian).

Vasilevskaya L.Yu. (2003). Legal regulation of collateral in Germany and Russia: a monograph. M.: Publisher RGTEHU. 188 p. (In Russian)

Published
2019-06-01