Artificial intelligence as a subject of law: pros and cons.
Abstract
The article deals with the analysis of the recognition of artificial intelligence systems as subjects of law. The article substantiates the assertion that at the moment there are no objective criteria for recognition or refusal to recognize something by the subject of law. The author comes to the conclusion that formally artificial intelligence can be recognized as a subject of law in a similar way to the legal capacity of a legal entity. Due to the existing differences between the properties of man and the intellectual system, humanity does not have an obligation to recognize such systems as the subject of law.
References
Arato, J. (2010). Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and Their Diverse Consequences. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 9, 443–494;
Arkhipov, V.V., & Naumov, V.B. (2017). Artificial intelligence and autonomous devices in the context of law: on the development of the first law on robotics in Russia. Works of SPIIRAS, 6(55), 46-62.
Asaro, P. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. In: The IEEE conference on robotics and automation. http://www.peterasaro.org/writing/ASARO%20Legal%20Perspective.pdf
Badiщu, A. (2013). The mysterious relationship between philosophy and politics. M.: Institute for Humanitarian Research, 112 p.
Baranov, P., Mamychev, A., Mordovtsev, A., Danilyan, O., & Dzeban, A. (2018). Doctrihal-legal and ethical problems of developing and applying robotic technologies and artificial intelligence systems (using autonomous unmanned underwater vehicles). Bulletin of the National Academy of Culture and Arts, 2, 465 - 472.
Baranov, P., Mamychev, A., Ovchinnikov, A., Petruk, G., & Krupnitskaya, V. (2017). Interdisciplinary and “post-disciplinary” approaches in the archetypal studies of the public-power organization of society // Man in India, 97(23), 375–387.
Bennett, J. (2018). Pulsating matter: the political ecology of things. Perm: Gile Press.
Bryson, J.J., Diamantis, M.E., & Grant, T.D. (2017). Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 273-291.
Butler, J. (2018). The psyche of power: the theory of subjection. St.P: Aleteia, 160 p.
Chestnov, I.L. (2012). Postclassical theory of law. Monograph. St.P.: Publishing House "Alef-Press", 650 p.
Connolly, W. (1993). The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. L.
Danaher, J. (2017). The rise of the robots and the crisis of moral patiency. AI & Society, 1–8.
Davenport, D. (2014). Moral mechanisms. Philosophy and Technology, 27(1), 47-60.
Declaration on cooperation in artificial intelligence (10.04.2018) // Robotic law. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://robopravo.ru/initsiativy_frantsii_v_sfierie_robototiekhniki_2013_2
Delanda, M. (2014). War in the era of intelligent machines. Ekaterinburg: An office scientist; M.: Institute for General Humanitarian Research, 338 p.
Delanda, M. (2017). New ontology for the social sciences. Logos, 27 (3), 35-57.
Delanda, M. (2018). The new philosophy of society: Theory of assemblages and social complexity. Perm: Gile Press, 170 p.
U.S. Department of Defense, Law of War Manual, 6.5.9.3 (2015), http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/Law-of-War-Manual-June-2015.pdf.
Draft Report of Committee on Legal Affairs (Rapporteur: Mady Delvaux) with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%20COMPARL%20PE-582.443%2001%20DOC%20PDF%20V0%2F%2FEN
Eirik Bjorge, I. (2011). International Court of Justice, Case concerning the dispute regarding navigational and related rights (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) judgment of 13 July 2009. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60, 271-279.
Ethically Aligned Design. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, O. (2017). Incorporating Ethics into Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Ethics, 21(4), 403-418.
Everything You Need To Know About Sophia, The World's First Robot Citizen, Forbes Official site, https://www.forbes.com/sites/zarastone/2017/11/07/everything-you-need-to-know-about-sophia-the-worlds-first-robot-citizen/
Foerst, A. (1999). Artificial sociability: from embodied AI toward new understandings of personhood. Technology in Society, 21.
Fraundorfer, M. (2018). The Rediscovery of Indigenous Thought in the Modern Legal System: The Case of the Great Apes. Global Policy, 9(1), 17-25.
Greenfield, A. (2018). Radical technologies: the every-day-carry device. M.
Hallevy, G. (2010). The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities. SSRN Electronic Journal (February 15, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1564096 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1564096
Harari, Iu.N. (2018). Homo Deus. A brief history of the future. M.: Sinbad, 480 p.
Harman, G. (2017). Networks and assemblies: the revival of things of Latour and Deland. Logos, 3(27), 1-34.
Keisner, A., Raffo, J., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2016). Robotics: Breakthrough Technologies, Innovation, Intellectual Property. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(2), 7-27.
Khabrieva, T.Ia. (2018). Law in digital reality // Journal of Russian law, 1, 5-19.
Koops, B-J., Hildebrandt, M., & Jaquet-Chiffelle, D-O. (2010) Bridging the accountability gap: rights for new entities in the information society. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 11(2), 497-561.
Larina, E.S., & Ovchinskii, V.S. (2018). Artificial Intelligence. Big data. Crime. M.: Knizhnyi mir, 416 p.
Latour, B. (2018). Politics of nature. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 336 p.
Latur, B. (2014). Reassembly of the social: an introduction to the actor-network theory. M.: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics, 420 p.
Law, J. (2012). Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion. The Social Construction of Technological System: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology / W.E. Bijker et al. (eds). Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press, 105-127.
Luo, J. (2015). After the method: mess and social science. M.: Publishing house of Gaidar Institute, 352 p.
Magun, A.V. (2018). Negative revolution: towards the deconstruction of a political subject. St.P.: Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg, 368 p.
Malakhov, V.P. (2013). Myths of modern general legal theory. M.: UNITY-DANA. 152 p.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms Behind Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rancier, J. (2013). Dissent: Politics and Philosophy. St.P.: Machina, 192 p.
Salthouse, T.A. (2009). When Does Age-Related Cognitive Decline Begin? Neurobiology of Aging, 30(4) (April), 507–514.
Schmidt, A.T. (2018). Persons or Property - Freedom and the Legal Status of Animals. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 15(1), 20-45.
Solaiman, S.M. (2017). Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols, and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(2), 155-179.
Solum, B. (1992). Lawrence Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, 70(4).
Staker, A. (2017). Should Chimpanzees Have Standing? The Case for Pursuing Legal Personhood for Non-Human Animals. Transnational Environmental Law, 6(3), 485-507.
Talapina, E.V. (2018). Law and digitalization: new challenges and prospects. Journal of Russian Law, 2, 5-17.
Urry, J. (2018). What does the future look like? M.: Publishing house "Delo" RANEPA, 320 p.
Vakhstein, V. (2017). Reassembly of everyday life: drones, elevators, and the PkM-1 project. Logos, 27(2), 2-48.
Virno, P. (2015). Grammar of the multitude: to the analysis of the forms of modern life. M.: Ad Marginem.
Zizek, S. Event. (2018). A philosophical journey through the concept. M.: RIPOL classic, 240 p.
Zizek. (2014). A sensitive subject: the absent center of political ontology. M.: Publishing House "Delo", 528 p.
