Abuse of Rights in Corporate Legal Relations: The concept and characteristics, subjects and forms.
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to determine the Abuse of Rights in Corporate Legal Relations; the theoretical, methodological, conceptual and institutional aspects of abuse of the right by shareholders in relations with a joint-stock company were used. Results showed that Abuse of Rights by shareholders is understood as a violation by shareholders of the basic rules of corporate behavior according to which a shareholder is obliged to exercise his/her rights and legitimate interests while respecting the rights of other shareholders, as well as the entire joint-stock company.
References
Adamovich, G. (2005). Problems of Applying the Institute of Abuse of rights in Corporate Relations. Economy and Law, 5, P. 60.
An interesting book about the abuse of rights // State and law. 1997, 4, 122 - 124.
Apolsky, E., Baranov, P., Mamychev, A., Mordovtsev, A., Ovchinnikov, A. (2017). (19th - early XX centuries). Man in India, 97(23),105-113.
P. Baranov, A., Mamychev, A., Ovchinnikov, G., & Petruk, V. (2017). Krupnitskaya Interdisciplinary and “post-disciplinary” approaches in the archetypal studies of the public- power organization of society // Man In India, 97(23), 375-387.
Barmin, O.N. (2012). On the issue of abuse of procedural rights in the arbitration process // Arbitration and civil procedure, 10.
Belov, V.A., & Pestereva, E.V. (2002). Economic societies. M., P. 139.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1999). About a man, his freedom and spirituality. M., P.89.
Cherepakhin, B.B. (). Will formation and the will of a legal entity. P. 300.
Dal, V.I. (1989). Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language. M., 1, 685.
Darovskikh, S.M., & Darovskikh, O.I. (2012). The principle of the inadmissibility of abuse of rights in criminal proceedings. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law, 43(302).
Dobrovolsky, V.I. Protection of corporate property in the arbitration court [Digital sources]. Legal reference system Garant.
Egorov, A.V. (2013). The principle of good faith in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: the first steps of the reform. Legal Insight, 2(18), 4-10;
Fedorov, A.Yu. (2010). Raiding and greenmail (organizational and legal countermeasures): Monograph. M.: VoltersKlover.
General Theory of Law and the State / Edited by V.V. Lazarev.M., 1994. Pp. 324.
Gorbov, V.V. (2004). Legal protection of a joint-stock company from a hostile takeover: the thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences. M., P. 21.
Gorbov, V.V. (2004). Legal protection of the joint-stock company from unfriendly absorption: the thesis of the candidate of legal sciences. M., P. 21.
Gribanov, V.P. (2000). Limits of the implementation and protection of civil rights. Implementation and protection of civil rights, M., P. 22.
Gribanov, V.P. (2001). The limits of the exercise and protection of civil rights. M.
Gureev, V.A. Problems of protecting the rights and interests of shareholders in the Russian Federation [Digital sources]. Legal reference system Garant.
Iontsev, M.G. (2006). Corporate takeovers: mergers, acquisitions, greenmail. 2nd edition revised and enlarged. M., S. 10.
Kalinkina, L.D. (2010). On the issue of abuse of rights and their unfair use in criminal proceedings. Lawyer, 4, 5-9.
Karaseva, I.A. (2013). Abuse of rights as one of the reasons for the alleged competition of constitutional values. Constitutional and municipal law, 7, 9-13.
Karkhalev, D.N. (2013). The principle of good faith in civil law. Civil Law, 5, 30-32.
Kazatsker, D.A. (2012). Abuse by a party of its rights within the framework of the criminal process. The limits and boundaries of admissibility of tactics of the prosecution and defence. Voronezh lawyer, 7.
Krotkova, M., & Kirshenman, E. Greenmail: attack or defence [Digital sources]. Legal reference system Consultant Plus.
Kruss, V.I. (2010). Abuse of rights: textbook. M.
Lapaeva, V.V. (1996). Elections to the State Duma in 1995: problems of improving the legislation. State and Law, 9, 24-25.
Malein, N.S. (1992). Legal liability and fairness. M., P. 160.
Malinovsky, A.A. (2005). The Limits of Subjective Law. Journal of Russian Law, 11, P.12
Malinovsky, A.A. (2007). Subjective law abuse (theoretical and legal research). M.
Melnik, A. (2005). The problem on abuse of rights in corporate conflicts. Legal Practice, 19(385)
Monuments of Roman law: 12 Tables Laws. (1997). Institutions of Gaius. Digest of Justinian. M.: Mirror, P.24
Oskina, I., & Lupu, A. (2011). No greenmail! // EJ-Lawyer, 43.
Osokina, G. (1999). Whose rights are protected by indirect claims? // Russian justice, 10, 18 - 19.
Osokina, G. (1999). Whose rights are protected by indirect claims? Russian justice, 10, 18 - 19.
Ovchinnikov, A.I. (2012). The ideology of Russian statehood in the context of modernization: basic values and priorities. North Caucasian Legal Bulletin, 1, 20-25.
Ovchinnikov, A.I. (2013). Edict of Milan and its role in shaping the values of modern law. Philosophy of Law, 3(58), 15-19.
Ovchinnikov, A.I., Mamychev, A.Y., & Litvinova, S.F. (2015). Extra-legal and shadow living of public authorities. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 387-393.
Radchenko, S.D. (2010). Abuse of rights in the civil law of Russia. M.: Volters Kluver.
Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Far Eastern District dated October 24, (2006). in case N F03-A73 / 06-1 / 3467.
Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the West Siberian District dated 21.11.2006 No. F04-7702 / 2006 (28518-А70-12) in case No. A70-2023 / 26-2006
Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus District dated 24.12.1999 No. F08-2919 / 99 in case No. A53-1992 / 99-S5-19
Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus region dated July 17, 2007, No. F08-4309 / 2007 in case No. A63-8060 / 2006-S1.
Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus region dated October 10, 2006, in case N F08-5015 / 2006.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1998). On the social contract, or Principles of political law. On the social contract. Treatises / Translated from French, M., P. 219.
Rozhkova, M.A. (2005). Corporate relations and disputes arising from them // Bulletin of Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 9, 142, 145.
Sazonov, I.V. (2012). Qualification of the behaviour of subjects as an abuse of civil law. M.
Suvorov, N.S. On legal entities under Roman law. Pp. 30, 68.
Totyev, K.Yu. (1996). Competition and monopolies: Legal aspects of regulation: Textbook. M., P. 109.
Tsybulevskaya, O.I. (2004). The moral aspect of abuse of rights // Actual issues of private law: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers / Responsible editor Yu.S. Povarov, V.D. Ruzanova. Samara, P. 266.
Vereshchagin, A.N. (2011). Supporters of the introduction of the ban to “circumvent the law” in the Civil Code bypass themselves the actual problems in the law, Vedomosti.
Yatsenko, T.S. (2003). Category of chicane in civil law: history and modernity. M.
