The implementation of spoken interaction methods as efficient tools to improve 21st century skills in English for specific purposes training in Higher schools of Ukraine.

  • Iryna Simkova Department of English Language for Humanities, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, (Kyiv, Ukraine).
  • Kateryna Tuliakova Department of English Language for Humanities, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
Keywords: English professional discussion, English for specific purposes, spoken interaction, 21st century skills, professionals in the field of international social entrepreneurship

Abstract

The paper deals with the research in which English professional discussion (EPD) is considered as an effective tool for improvement of students’ language knowledge, skills and abilities during English for specific purposes (ESP) training in Higher schools of Ukraine. The authors concentrate on the stages and components of EPD training. 100 future professionals in the field of international social entrepreneurship took part in the research. This research has clearly shown that it gives future professionals in the field of international social entrepreneurship opportunity to improve such skills as critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, active learning, and communication during ESP training.

Author Biographies

Iryna Simkova, Department of English Language for Humanities, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, (Kyiv, Ukraine).

Doctor of Sciences (Education), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of
English Language for Humanities, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv
Polytechnic Institute”, (Kyiv, Ukraine).

Kateryna Tuliakova, Department of English Language for Humanities, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Magister of Education, Teacher of the Department of English Language
for Humanities, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic
Institute”, (Kyiv, Ukraine).

References

Bolitho, R., West R. (2017). The internationalisation of Ukrainian universities: the English language dimension. K: «Vydavnytsvo «Stal’».

Borg, S. (2019). The Impact of the English for Universities Project on ESP and EMI in Ukrainian Higher Education. British Council Ukraine.

Burns, M., Griffith, A. (2018). The Learning Imperative: Raising performance in organisations by improving learning. Crown House Publishing.

Chu, S., Reynolds, R., Notari, M., Taveres, N., & Lee, C. (2016). 21st Century Skills Development through Inquiry Based Learning from Theory to Practice. Springer Science. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8_1

Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. Corwin.

Hyland, K. (2007). English for specific purposes: Some influences and impacts. In J. Cummins, & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching, 391–402. New York: Springer.

Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

Manoilov, P., Tardieu, C. (2016). Assessment of spoken interactions in two conditions: Teacher-to-student versus student-to-student. Language Assessment for Multilinguism, Cambridge University Press, 490-510., Studies in Language Testing (SiLT) series. hal-01249747f

McDonough, J. and C. Shaw. (2003). Materials and Methods in ELT: a teacher’s guide. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press

Simkova, I. (2012). Modern approaches to foreign language competence development for students of nonlinguistic specialisms. Slavonic Journal. Kyiv Dmytro Burago Publishing House, 305-309.

Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M. (2018). Genres of Spoken Interaction. Teaching Speaking and Pronunciation Research on Teaching Speaking. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0709

Tohidi, H., Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820-824.