Values of communicative environment formation in different audiences via Englishspeaking competence.
Abstract
The article offers a classification of the communicative environment (professional, indifferent, situational, systematic and everyday) and analyzes the choice of linguistic means for the realization of communication. Particular attention has been focused on the values of choosing English-speaking communication models according to the needs of the audience and its quality characteristics. The communication effects, which are important in supporting or completing a communicative act (utilitarian, prestigious, emotional, aesthetic satisfaction, comfort, strengthening of position, satisfaction of cognitive interest), are defined. It is concluded that there are certain socio-cultural barriers of understanding information related to the content and formal characteristics of the utterance (phonetic, stylistic, semantic) as well as the propositional logic.
References
Baryshpolets, O. (2006). Chynnyky vplyvu zasobiv masovoi informatsii na audytoriiu [Media Impact Factors on an audience]. Sotsialna psykholohiia: Ukrainskyi naukovyi zhurnal, 6, 153-163. [in Ukrainian]
Ivanova, O., Moiseieva, O. (2019). Audytoriia lokalnykh media [Local media audience]. Kyiv: Biznespolihraf. [in Ukrainian]
Kharytonenko, O. (2012). Chytach i chytachivstvo: istorychna obumovlenist zminy chytatskykh praktyk [Reader and readership: historical implications of changing reader practices] . Kyiv: NPU im. M.P. Drahomanova. [in Ukrainian]
Luchkina, L. (2002). Formuvannia fakhovoho slovnyka v maibutnikh uchyteliv tekhnichnykh spetsialnostei [Building professional vocabulary of future technical specialties teachers] . Naukovi zapysky TDPU im. V. Hnatiuka. Seriia: Pedahohika, 3, 104-105. [in Ukrainian]
Markiv, O. (2014). Do pytannia retsypiientskykh audytorii yak providnoho oriientyra v profesiinii diialnosti zhurnalistiv ta redactoriv [To the issue of recipient audiences as a primary point of reference in the professional work of journalists and editors]. Humanitarnyi visnyk DVNZ "Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni Hryhoriia Skovorody", 31, 242-247. [in Ukrainian]
Markiv, O. (2015). Markiv O. Komunikatyvna efektyvnist ZMI: tsilespriamovanist, manipuliatyvnist [Communicative media effect: purposefulness, manipulative] Materialy XI mezinarodni vedecko-prakticka conference «Dny vedy», 60-61. [in Ukrainian]
McQuail, D. (2010). Mass communication theory. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Orban-Lembryk, L. (2004). Osoblyvosti formuvannia hromadskoi dumky [Features of public opinion formation]. Sotsialna psykholohiia, 2, 77-89. [in Ukrainian]
Skurativska, H. (2001). Kerivnytstvo navchalnoiu diialnistiu studentiv u protsesi ovolodinnia nymy ofitsiino-dilovym stylem pysemnoho profesiinoho spilkuvannia inozemnoiu movoiu [Management of students' training activities in mastering the official and professional business] . Inozemni movy, 2, 30-34. [in Ukrainian]
Stekhina,V. (2009). Komunikatyvnyi vplyv yak kliuchova problema neorytoryky msamedia [Communicative influence as a key issue in media non-rhetoric]. Zbirnyk naukovykh dopovidei Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Zhurnalistyka, filolohiia ta mediaosvita»,2, 342-345. [in Ukrainian]
Zarivna, O. (2013). Formuvannia oriientyriv anhlomovnoho mizhkulturnoho spilkuvannia [Landmarks formation of English-speaking intercultural communication] . Suspilstvo. Derzhava. Armiia: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats (suspilni nauky), 102-105. [in Ukrainian]
Zarivna, O. (2017). Vykorystannnia interaktyvnoi metodyky navchannia studentiv anhliiskoi movy u VNZ nemovnykh spetsialnostei [Using the interactive methodology when teaching English for non-linguistic students at universities]. Podolannia movnykh ta komunikatyvnykh barieriv: osvita, nauka, kultura: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats,147-151. [in Ukrainian]
