Community bird monitors: training and participation in research projects.

  • Vicente Paul Saldívar Alonso Univesidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
  • Frida Carmina Caballero Rico Univesidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
  • Rubén Ortega Álvarez CONACYT
  • José Alberto Ramírez de León Univesidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
Keywords: Community monitors, training, development, assessment

Abstract

A community monitor is a person who has knowledge of the environment in which they live and has developed technical and scientific skills for environmental conservation. Although his experience is recognized by different actors, his training and participation in investigations is not completely clear. This work contributes to understand the training and research profiles of community monitors in three Protected Natural Areas located in two states of Mexico. Through semi-structured interviews, we found that the training is similar and begins by associating with national entities; however, its development is linked to personal characteristics and the context. We propose the convenience of a coordinated management to assess the contributions of community monitors.

References

Arce-Plata, M. I., Herrera-Varón, J., Gutiérrez Montoya, C., & Londoño Murcia, M. C. (2020). Monitoreo comunitario de la biodiversidad en Montes de María. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. http://repository.humboldt.org.co/handle/20.500.11761/35586

ATLAS.ti. (2022). ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. https://atlasti.com/es

Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S. E., & Pyle, R. (2000). Quantifying Biodiversity: Experience with Parataxonomists and Digital Photography in Papua New Guinea and Guyana. BioScience, 50(10), 899. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0899:QBEWPA]2.0.CO;2

Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S. E., Weiblen, G. D., Missa, O., & Stewart, A. J. A. (2004). Conservation and biological monitoring of tropical forests: The role of parataxonomists: Parataxonomists and biological monitoring. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41(1), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00878.x

CONABIO. (2015). Memoria del 4to encuentro de monitores comunitarios de aves. https://biodiversidad.gob.mx/media/1/ciencia-ciudadana/documentos/memoria_4_encuentro_monitores_comunitarios_aves.pdf.

Crowston, K., & Fagnot, I. (2008). The motivational arc of massive virtual collaboration. Proceedings of the IFIP WG, 9(5). http://www.ifip95wg.org/archive/conference2008/

Editorial, E. (2008). Declaración de Helsinki de la Asociación Médica Mundial. Arbor, 184(730), Art. 730.

Eveleigh, A., Jennett, C., Blandford, A., Brohan, P., & Cox, A. L. (2014). Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2985-2994. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557262

Glaser, B. G. (1999). The Future of Grounded Theory. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 836-845. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122199

Gold, M. (2022). ECSA 10 Principles of Citizen Science. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N

Land-Zandstra, A. M., van Beusekom, M., Koppeschaar, C., & van den Broek, J. (2016). Motivation and learning impact of Dutch flu-trackers. Journal of Science Communication, 15(01), A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15010204

Levontin, L., Gilad, Z., & Chako, S. (2018). Motivation for CS questionnaire. Technical report. https://cs-eu.net/news/questionare-motivation-citizen-science-scale

Microsoft. (2022). Microsoft Teams. Microsoft. https://www.microsoft.com/es-mx/microsoft-teams/

Moczek, N., Hecker, S., & Voigt-Heucke, S. L. (2021). The Known Unknowns: What Citizen Science Projects in Germany Know about Their Volunteers—And What They Don’t Know. Sustainability, 13(20), 11553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011553

Ortega-Álvarez, R., Sánchez-González, L. A., Berlanga, H., Rodríguez-Contreras, V., & Vargas, V. (2022). Manual para monitores comunitarios de aves. https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/media/1/ciencia-ciudadana/documentos/m_monitores_comunitarios_aves.pdf.

Presidencia de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. (2014). Reglamento de la Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente en Materia de Áreas Naturales Protegidas. Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/regley/Reg_LGEEPA_ANP.pdf

Programa de monitores comunitarios. (2022). https://enel.cl/content/enel-cl/es/megamenu/sostenibilidad/creacion-valor-compartido/centrales-enel-y-proyectos-comunidades/cerro-pabellon/monitores-comunitarios.html

Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., & Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’12, 217. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145238

Schmiedel, U., Araya, Y., Bortolotto, M. I., Boeckenhoff, L., Hallwachs, W., Janzen, D., Kolipaka, S. S., Novotny, V., Palm, M., Parfondry, M., Smanis, A., & Toko, P. (2016). Contributions of paraecologists and parataxonomists to research, conservation, and social development. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 506-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12661

Tarango-Arámbula, L. A. (2015). Monitores Comunitarios para la Conservación e Investigación Participativa en Áreas Naturales Protegida. Agro Productividad, 8(5), Art. 5. https://revista-agroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/684

West, S., & Pateman, R. (2016). Recruiting and Retaining Participants in Citizen Science: What Can Be Learned from the Volunteering Literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.8

Published
2022-12-01