The impact of jurisdictional guarantees on the protection of nonhuman animal rights in Ecuador.

  • Oswaldo Liber Andrade Salazar Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes
  • Yanhet Lucía Valverde Torres Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes
  • Aurelia María Cleonares Borbor Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes
Keywords: rights, non-human animals, nature, life, jurisdictional guarantees

Abstract

The theoretical analysis that makes up this study highlights the effectiveness of jurisdictional guarantees in the protection of animal rights in Ecuador; pioneer country in the recognition of the rights of nature since its constitution in 2008. The research was based on a qualitative approach and exhaustive documentary review that covered books, scientific articles, legislation, and official documents. Inductive-deductive, analysis-synthesis and exegetical methods were used to unravel and reflect on this complex topic. Through the analysis of various sentences, the recourse to jurisdictional guarantees to safeguard the rights of animals was evident, which suggests the relevance of activating constitutional justice as a fundamental protection mechanism for these beings.

References

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente del Ecuador (2008) Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial N. 449. https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.pdf

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador (2009) Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. Registro Oficial Suplemento N. 52. https://www.oas.org/juridico/PDFs/mesicic4_ecu_org2.pdf

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador (2014) Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial Suplemento N. 180. https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/03/COIP_act_feb-2021.pdf

Bravo, Á. (2020) Los animales como seres autónomos y la indolencia de los seres “pensantes” a la luz del derecho crítico: análisis especial sobre animales domésticos (Master's thesis, Quito, EC: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador). https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/7257/1/T3141-MDE-Bravo-Los%20animales.pdf

Castillo, M. (2021) El hábeas corpus como garantía constitucional de protección de derechos de los animales. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 6(5), 252-264. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8143678.pdf

Congreso Nacional del Ecuador (2005) Código Civil. Registro Oficial Suplemento N. 46. https://www.defensoria.gob.ec/images/defensoria/pdfs/lotaip2014/info-legal/Codigo_civil_titulo_preliminar.pdf

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2022) Sentencia 253-20-JH/22. Caso Mona Estrellita. CCE. http://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/e2NhcnBldGE6J3RyYW1pdGUnLCB1dWlkOic3ZmMxMjVmMi1iMzZkLTRkZDQtYTM2NC1kOGNiMWIwYWViMWMucGRmJ30=

Presidencia de la República del Ecuador (2017) Código Orgánico del Ambiente. Registro Oficial Suplemento N. 983. https://www.ambiente.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2018/01/CODIGO_ORGANICO_AMBIENTE.pdf

Sagot, A. (2018) Los derechos de la naturaleza, una visión jurídica de un problema paradigmático. Revista Judicial, Poder Judicial de Costa Rica, 1(125), 63-102. https://escuelajudicialpj.poder-judicial.go.cr/images/bibliotecavirtual/Revista_Judicial_125.pdf#page=63

Zaffaroni, R. (2011) La Pachamama y el humano. Ediciones Madres Plaza de Mayo. https://fundacion-rama.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/6580.-La-Pachamama-y-el-humano-Zaffaroni.pdf

Published
2024-05-01