Characteristics of arbitral jurisdiction and the resolution of conflicts between states from the perspective of judges and arbitrators.
Abstract
The objective of the work is to analyze and compare the characteristics of arbitration jurisdiction and the resolution of conflicts between states. Through a survey directed at 100 international law professionals, their experiences, perceptions and preferences in their judicial and arbitration practice are explored. Most participants have between 10 and 20 years of experience and have an equal gender distribution and diverse representation in terms of regions of practice. Judges and arbitrators prefer arbitral jurisdiction for economic and commercial disputes due to its flexibility and efficiency. Institutions that manage these processes can use these findings to improve their procedures and increase user satisfaction.
References
Argaña, E. V. (2016). Tratados bilaterales de inversiones (TBI) y el contrato de inversión. ¿Jurisdicción local o internacional? Interacciones entre el derecho público y el derecho privado. Estudios de Derecho Empresario ISSN 2346-9404, 9. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/esdeem/article/view/15952/15768
Bocanegra, E. D. (2001). Las empresas multinacionales en el Derecho Internacional Público contemporáneo. Ius et Veritas, (23), 42-58. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/download/16016/16440
Boggiano, A. (2015). El Código Civil y Comercial y el derecho internacional público y privado. La Ley, 681. http://www-2020.scba.gov.ar/leyorganica/CCyc30/pdfley/Boggiano_El_Codigo_Civil_y_Comercial_y_el_derecho_internacional_publico_y_privado.pdf
Brower, C. N., & Schill, S. W. (2008). Is arbitration a threat or a boom to the legitimacy of international investment law?. Chi. J. Int'l L., 9, 471. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1489&context=cjil
Cardona, Á. G. (2001). Origen y desarrollo de la Solución Alternativa de Conflictos en Ecuador. Iuris Dictio, 2(4). https://revistas.usfq.edu.ec/index.php/iurisdictio/article/download/561/632
Jaramillo, J. V. T. (2004). Los medios alternativos de solución de conflictos y el derecho tributario internacional. Foro: revista de Derecho, (3), 5-43. https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/download/288/287
Kundmüller-Caminiti, F. (2003). Exclusión de la sede judicial para la solución de controversias en los contratos del Estado: el arbitraje de derecho. Ius et Praxis, (034), 67-80. https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ius_et_Praxis/article/download/3662/3597
Kyriakopoulos, G. G. D. (2023). On the settlement of space-and international telecommunications- related disputes. Acta Astronautica, 211, 655-663. https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/LAW835/M%20A%20T%20E%20R%20I%20A%20L%20-%20D%20O%20C%20U%20M%20E%20N%20T%20A%20T%20I%20O%20N/GDKYRIAKOPOULOS_DISPUTE%20SETTLEMENT%20-%20SPACE%20-%20TELECOMS.pdf
Meskic, Z., & Gagula, A. (2024). Why the Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration Does Not Matter and Why It Should. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16(1), 04523036. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-990
Orbay-Graves, A. (2023). Use of international commercial arbitration for project finance disputes: A new approach for drafting the arbitration clause (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University London). https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/28439/1/FulltextThesis.pdf
Orellana, E. N. (2007). El Estado y el juicio de arbitraje según la legislación ecuatoriana. Iuris dictio, 7(11). https://revistas.usfq.edu.ec/index.php/iurisdictio/article/download/674/746
Park, S. M. (2024). Commercial arbitration regime and sourcing decision. International Review of Law and Economics, 78, 106195. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818824000152
Pernía-Reyes, M. R. (2014). La resolución de conflictos surgidos con ocasión de las actividades extractivas y el Decreto con rango, valor y fuerza de Ley de Inversiones Extranjeras: culminación del movimiento pendular en la actividad minera. Revista de Derecho Público, (140), 224-233. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mauricio-Pernia-Reyes/publication/309675644_La_actividad_minera_y_la_nueva_legislacion_de_inversiones_extranjeras_en_Venezuela/links/581cc18e08aeccc08aec9868/La-actividad-minera-y-la-nueva-legislacion-de-inversiones-extranjeras-en-Venezuela.pdf
Restrepo-Soto, D. (2014). La arbitrabilidad objetiva en el derecho de arbitraje. Ejil-EAFIT Journal of International Law, 5(1), 63-80. https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/ejil/article/download/2468/2332/
Rysavy, L. (2023). The Importance of the EU Law and the Law of the Member States in the Field of Out-Of-Court Dispute Resolution. European Studies, 10(1), 109-132. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/eustu-2023-0005
Saco, V. (2008). Resolución de conflictos normativos en Derecho Internacional Público. Agenda internacional, 15(26), 231-261. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6302358.pdf
Salaverry, F. C. (2004). La utilización de la vía arbitral en la solución de conflictos entre el estado peruano y los inversionistas. THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, (48), 167-186. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5110412.pdf
Shi, X. (2023). The relationship between general principles of international law and Article 38 (1) of the ICJ statute: A law of the sea perspective. Marine Policy, 148, 105427. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308597X22004742
Teichmann, F., Boticiu, S., & Sergi, B. S. (2023). The risk of abuse of arbitration proceedings in jurisdictions where corruption is pervasive. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2, 100032. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949791423000325
Wang, P. (2020). Multilateral Reform of Investor–State Dispute Resolution Mechanism: A Balance between Public Legitimacy Management and Private Efficiency Refinement. China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the “Belt and Road Initiative”(Cambridge University Press, 2020) pp, 149-184. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peng-Wang-353/publication/349752184_Multilateral_Reform_of_Investor-State_Dispute_Resolution_Mechanism_A_Balance_between_Public_Legitimacy_Management_and_Private_Efficiency_Refinement/links/609943ee458515d3150ee40e/Multilateral-Reform-of-Investor-State-Dispute-Resolution-Mechanism-A-Balance-between-Public-Legitimacy-Management-and-Private-Efficiency-Refinement.pdf
