The teacher professional development and the school leadership in Basic Education schools.
Abstract
This paper presents a quantitative study aimed to inquire into professional conditions of school leaders and teachers in Mexico. Based on questionnaires for teachers and school principals, this study focused on the teacher professional development and the school leadership, considering indicators as teacher training, induction and mentoring, teacher appraisal, and school climate. 842 teachers and 106 school principals from public elementary schools in Colima participated in this study. The results of this study coincide in relevant aspects with those of the TALIS 2013 results, reinforcing the need of attending the guidelines and policies indicated to the Mexican Educational System.
References
Alvira, F. (1983). Perspectiva Cualitativa-Perspectiva cuantitativa en la Metodología Sociológica. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 22, 53-75. Recuperado de: http://www.reis.cis.es/REIS/PDF/REIS_022_05.pdf
Asuga, G., Eacott, S., Scevak, J. (2015). School Leadership Preparation and Development in Kenya: Evaluating Performance Impact and Return on Leadership Development Investment. International Journal of Educational Management, 29 (3), 355-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2013-0158
Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers, the challenges of lifelong learning. The Falmer Press.UK. Recuperado de: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED434878.pdf
Finnigan, K. (2010). Principal Leadership and Teacher Motivation under High-Stakes Accountability Policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(2), 161-189. DOI: 10.1080/15700760903216174.
Gómez-Zermeño, M. G. y Alemán, L. Y. (2014). PROYECTO PETC: Estudio de casos de éxito sobre la gestión y el liderazgo escolar en las escuelas de tiempo completo. Monterrey, Nuevo León, México: ITESM. ISBN: 978-607-501-313-8
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading Educational Change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352. DOI: 10.1080/0305764032000122005
Hardy, I. (2012). The Politics of Teacher Professional Development: Policy, Research and Practice. Routledge Research in Education. USA: Routledge, Taylor y Francis Group.
INEE (2015). Los docentes en México. Informe 2015. México: INEE.
Leithwood y Jantzi (2007). A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-199. Recuperado de: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15700760500244769
Miller, P. (Ed.) (2013). School Leadership in the Caribbean: Perceptions, Practices, Paradigms. UK: Symposium Books.
OCDE (2004). La cuestión del profesorado: atraer, capacitar y conservar a profesores eficientes. Resumen en Español. Paris. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/36/34991371.pdf
OCDE (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments, First Results from TALIS. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606.pdf
OCDE (2010a). Acuerdo de cooperación México- OCDE para mejorar la calidad de la educación de las escuelas mexicanas. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/49/46216786.pdf
OCDE (2010b). Calidad Educativa. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/document/4/0,3343,en_2649_39263231_41829700_1_1_1_1,00.html
OCDE (2011). Establecimiento de un marco para la evaluación e incentivos docentes: Consideraciones para México. OCDE Publishing. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/48599568.pdf
OCDE (2014a). Talis 2013, Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en
OCDE (2014b). TALIS 2013 Technical Report. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/TALIS-technical-report-2013.pdf
Opfer, V., y Pedder, D. (2011). The Lost Promise of Teacher Professional Development in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 3-24. http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/02619768.2010.534131
Pont B., Nusche D., y Moorman H. (2008). Improving School Leadership, Volume 1: Policy and Practice. OCDE, Paris. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/education/school/44374889.pdf
Robinson, W., y Bryce, M. (2013). "Willing Enthusiasts" or "Lame Ducks"? Issues in Teacher Professional Development Policy in England and Wales 1910-1975. Pedagogía Histórica: International Journal of the History of Education, 49(3), 45-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2012.744061
Santiago, P., McGregor, I., Nusche, D., Ravela, R., y Toledo, D. (2012). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Recuperado de: http://www.inee.edu.mx/images/stories/docentes/eva/mexico1.pdf
Schleicher, A. (2009). El informe TALIS. Conclusiones de la Primera Evaluación Internacional sobre Enseñanza y Aprendizaje. Fundación Santillana. Recuperado de: http://www.fundacionsantillana.com/upload/ficheros/noticias/200911/interior_db_maquetado_2009_1.pdf
Soehner, D., y Ryan, T. (2011).The Interdependence of Principal School Leadership and Student Achievement. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5(3), 274-288. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ974355.pdf
Tschannen-Morana, M. y Barrb, M. (2004). Fostering Student Learning: The Relationship of Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools 3(3), 189.209. DOI: 10.1080/15700760490503706.
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. UNESCO: IIEP. Recuperado de: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133010e.pdf
Zhang, X., y Ng, H. (2011). A Case Study of Teacher Appraisal in Shanghai, China: In Relation to Teacher Professional Development. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 569-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9159-8








