The economics of academic labor in Higher Education Mediated by Generative Artificial Intelligence: reconfiguring teaching time.

  • Miguel Lizcano-Sánchez Universidad de Guadalajara
  • Laura Beatriz Vidal-Turrubiates Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco
  • Juan Agustín Torres-Vázquez Universidad de Guadalajara
  • Ángel Marcial-Carrillo Universidad de Guadalajara
Keywords: artificial intelligence, academic work, prompting architecture, work economics, technological mediation

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence into higher education has been studied, to a large extent, from pedagogical and instrumental perspectives; however, its influence on the organization of academic work remains an insufficiently explored dimension. Based on the systematization of an experience conducted across three university courses, this study examines the reconfiguration of instructional time, cognitive load, and professional agency in settings mediated by artificial intelligence. The findings reveal an approximate 84% reduction in the time devoted to instructional design, accompanied by a shift in effort toward tasks of a more strategic and reflective nature. Rather than replacing the work of faculty, the results suggest that artificial intelligence modifies the conditions under which academic work is performed.

References

Biesta, G. J. J. (2020). Educational research: An unorthodox introduction. Bloomsbury Academic.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, H., & Wang, H. (2024). Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.10997

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://apiperiodico.jalisco.gob.mx/api/sites/periodicooficial.jalisco.gob.mx/files/metodologia_de_la_investigacion_-_roberto_hernandez_sampieri.pdf

Jara Holliday, O. (2018). La sistematización de experiencias: Práctica y teoría para otros mundos posibles. Centro de Estudios y Publicaciones Alforja. https://repository.cinde.org.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.11907/2121/Libro%20sistematizacio%cc%81n%20Cinde-Web.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560815

O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017). Asked more often: Gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them. American Educational Research Journal. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319127391_Asked_More_Often_Gender_Differences_in_Faculty_Workload_in_Research_Universities_and_the_Work_Interactions_That_Shape_Them

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-centered AI. Oxford University Press. https://es.scribd.com/document/728062881/Human-Centered-AI-Ben-Shneiderman-Z-lib-org

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://www.emrahakman.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Cognitive-Load-Sweller-2011.pdf

UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating academia: The changing structure of academic time. Palgrave Macmillan. https://download.e-bookshelf.de/download/0007/7467/22/L-G-0007746722-0014061376.pdf

White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., & Elnashar, A. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.11382

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://ssrlsig.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/zimmerman-2005-attaining-self-reg-a-soc-cog-perspective.pdf

Published
2026-09-01