Break-even line model – addition to direct costing system.
Abstract
The relevance of the problem under study is conditioned by the need to eliminate the defects in the economic and mathematical models based on direct costs. The purpose of the article is to test the hypothesis, according to which the grouping of different corporate costs will help eliminate the drawbacks of the current system of direct costs. The study has resulted in an analytical (algebraic) expression of the equilibrium line model that confirms the effectiveness of the modification of the cost grouping system and proves the existence of the hypothesis. The inclusion of the conditions of the national tax system in the equilibrium line model offers new opportunities in assessing the solvency of business activity in several tax systems.
References
Beneish M.D. (1999). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation//Financial Analysts Journal. No. 5 (September/October). Vol. 55. P. 24-36
Beneish Messod D. (1994). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. N. Y. Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University. P. 28.
Blaug M. (2005). Great Economists Before Keynes: A Introduction to the Lives and Works of 100 Economists of the Past. Economic School,. P. 704.
Blumenthal R.G. (1998). Tis the Gift to Be Simple – Why the 80-year-old DuPont Model Still Has Fans? // CFO Magazine, January (1998).
Borner D. (1961). Direct Costing als System der Kostenrechnung. Munchen.
Brealey R. (1997). Myers S. Principles of Corporate Finance: Transl. from English. Moscow: Olimp-Biznes. P. 1120.
Dr. Brown Glen. Introduction to costs accounting: Methods and Techniques. New York-Berlin: Globusz Publishing.
Bychkova S.M., Sokolov Ya.V., Emmanuel K., Mc Kernan D., Kovalev V.V. (1998). Accounting in Russia and Great Britain: Benchmarking Experience [Bukhgalterskiy uchet v Rossii i Velikobritanii opyt sravneniya]. Bulletins of St. Petersburg State Economic University, No. 3, P. 112–121.
Cartwright N. (1945). The Vanity of Rigour in Economics Theoretical Models and Galilean Experiments, Hunting Causes and Using them. Approaches in Philosophy and Economics, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. P. 217–235.
Danilov G., Ryzhova I., Voinova E. (2009). Conditions of application of regression analysis for cost division into fixed and variable//Research and Technology Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. No. 71. P. 47.
Dechow Patricia M., Weili Ge, Larson Chad R., Sloan Richard G. (2010). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements // Con-temporary Accounting Research. Vol. 28, No. 1. P. 17-82.
Fridman M. (1994). The methodology of positive economics [Metodologiya pozitivnoy ekonomicheskoy nauki] // THESIS. No. 4. P. 20-52.
Harris L. (1981). Monetary theory. /Transl. from English/Gen. edit-p and opening chapter by V.M. Usoskin. Moscow: Progress, 1990. P. 750.
Hese H. (1903). Manufacturing. Capital Costs, Profits and Dividends//The Engineering Magazine. Vol. 26. No. 3, P. 367.
Hese H. (2000). Manufacturing. Capital Costs, Profits and Dividends. The Engineering Magazine, 2000,vol. 26. No. 3.
Imai M. (1986). Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success // MacGraw-Hill, New York, 1986.
John W. Bitner, Robert A. Goddard Successful Bank Asset/Liability Management: A guide to the future beyond gap, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
Kaplan R. (2005). System in Action [Sistema v deystvii]. Economic Strategies, No. 1, P. 84– 87.
Keynes J. M. (1939). Professor Tinbergen’s Method // The Economic Journal. Vol. 49, No. 195. P. 558–568.
Lafta J. K. Organization Theory [Teoriya organizatsii]. Training Manual. Moscow: TK Velbi, Prospekt Publishing House, 2006. P. 416
Levitt A. (1998). The Numbers Game/NYU, Centre for Law and Business. P. 87.
Luc Arrondel, Anne Laferrère (2001). Taxation and wealth transmission in France, Journal of Public Economics, Volume 79, Issue 1, P. 3-33.
Lucas R. (1980). Methods and problems in business cycle theory // Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 696–715.
Malitskaya V.B., Chirkova M.B. (2015). Conceptual Aspects of Financial Investment Depreciation Accounting in Line with Russian and Internationally Recognized Standards [Kontseptualnyye aspekty ucheta obestsenivaniya finansovykh vlozheniy v sootvetstvii s rossiyskimi i mezhdunarodno priznannymi standartami]. British Journal of Science Education and Culture. No. 7, P. 160–166
Martin J. R. (1989). Chapter 11: Conventional Linear Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis. Management Accounting: Concepts, Techniques & Controversial Issues. Management And Accounting Web. https://maaw.info/Chapter11.htm
Mikhailova E.V. (2011). Growth in Investor’s Profit as One of the Criteria of Builder’s Competitive Power Assessment [Rost pribyli investora kak odin iz kriteriyev otsenki konkurentosposobnosti stroitelnoy organizatsii]. Business. Education. Law, No. 3, P. 66–70.
Ohno T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production // Productivity Press, Cambridge.
Sheremet A.D. (2008). “Taturov Chair” of Lomonosov MSU majoring celebrates its 65th anniversary [Taturovskoy kafedre MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova – 65 let]. International Accounting, No. 9, P. 2–8.
Slavin V.A. (2015). Dynamic Aspects of Optimal Pricing in the Context of Direct Taxation [Dinamicheskiye aspekty optimalnogo tsenoobrazovaniya v usloviyakh pryamogo nalogooblozheniya firmy]. Journal of Economic Theory, No. 4, P. 78-90.
Stewart R.A. (2008). A framework for the life cycle management of information technology projects: Project IT. International Journal of Project Management. 26 (2): P. 203-212.
Tinbergen J. (1940). Econometric Business Cycle Research, The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 73–90.
Tinbergen J. (1940). On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research. A Comment Author(s): J. M. Keynes. The Economic Journal, Vol. 50, No. 197 (Mar., 1940), P. 154-156.
