La institucionalización de los principios de creación de leyes como una forma de transformar las categorías científicas en las soluciones de creación de leyes.

Mikhail B. Rumyantsev; Vladislav Yu. Turanin; Olga N. Gorodnova; Arthur A. Semenov; Yuliya V. Boltenkova.

Mikhail B. Rumyantsev FGNC VNIIMP imeni V.M. Gorbatova
Vladislav Yu. Turanin Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy St., Belgorod, 308015, Russia; Belgorod State Institute of Arts and Culture, 7 Koroleva St., Belgorod, 308033, Russia
Olga N. Gorodnova Cheboksary Cooperative Institute (branch) of the Russian University of Cooperation, 24 Gorky St., Cheboksary, 428025, Russia
Arthur A. Semenov Cheboksary Cooperative Institute (branch) of the Russian University of Cooperation, 24 Gorky St., Cheboksary, 428025, Russia
Yuliya V. Boltenkova. Federal State Public Educational Establishment of Higher Training Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Internal of the Russian Federation named after I.D. Putilin, 71, Gorkogo street, Belgorod, 308024, Russia

Keywords: law-making, institutionalization, legal science, perception, formal figuration

Abstract

Institutionalization of law-making principles is the most important state task to give to the law-making the task-oriented formation, to enforce legally state’s social purpose and development ways. The scientific perception of this principle should be enforced in legal act framework without which the principle itself shall not be valuable and alive. Institutionalization of law-making principles is preservation in legal norms the basic ideas, social and other values as the leading landmarks to regulate public relationships in order to form the social stability and development in the state. The formal figuration of law-making principles cannot be conceptualized unless solved in view of the legal regulation extent.

References

Alekseev, S. S. (1971). Sotsial’naia tsennost’prava v sovetskom obshchestve [Social Value of Law in Soviet Society]. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. 223 p.

Alekseev, S. S. (1996). Mechanism pravovogo regulirovania v socialisticheskom gosudarstve. M, pages.

Bowman, C. G., & Schneider, E. M. (1998). Feminist legal theory, feminist lawmaking, and the legal profession. Fordham L. Rev., 67, 249.

Craizl, P., & Murell, P. (2007). Allocating law-making powers: Self-regulation vs government regulation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 520–545

Manturova, N. S. (2005). Social’no-pravovye cennosti: osnovania dlya definicii. Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoiy akademii kul’tury i iskusstv, 170-174

Olesova, A. P., & Borisova, U. S. (2016). Formation of Professional-communicative Competence of the Future Teachers in the Conditions of the Yakut-Russian Bilingualism. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(10), 3435-3445.

Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A., Wouters, J., Berman, A., & Duquet, S. (2012). Informal International Lawmaking: Case Studies. Oslo: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher (TOAUP).

Rappaport, M. B. (2001). The Selective Nondelegation Doctrine and the Line Item Veto: A New Approach to the Nondelegation Doctrine and Its Implications for Clinton v. City of New York. Tul. L. Rev., 76, 265.

The law-making process in Ghana: Structures and Procedures. (2019). 20 pages. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/ghana/10506.pdf ( citation date: January 16, 2019)

Vasilyev, A. M. (1991). Ob ispolnimosti zakonov. Teoria prava: novye idei, 1, 75-78.

Zhinkin, S. A., & Chernyavskaya, T. M. (2006). Nekotorye problem realizacii principov pravotvorchestva v sovremennoy Rossii. Obshchestvo i parvo.

Institutionalization of law-making principles as a way to transform scientific categories into the law-making solutions.

Abstract

References