The development of metacognitive-based genetic learning instruments at Senior High School.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to develop learning instruments that produce learning instrument metacognition and metacognitive-based textbook about genetics. This research is a developmental research by using Define, Design, Development, Dissemination (4-D Thiagrajan model). Both of the qualitative and quantitative descriptive were used in data analysis. The results of the research are learning instrument product and textbook whose presentation characteristics correspond to the metacognitive science order, which consist of declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge. The expert validation and precision result shows that these instruments have satisfied the criteria: very valid and very ideal.
References
Cavallo. A.M.L. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students’s understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics. Journal of research in science teaching, 33, issue 6, pp. 625 -656
Coutinho, S.A. (2007) The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate, 7, issue 1, pp. 39-47.
Esiobu, G.O., & Soyibo, K. (1995). Effects of concept and vee mappings under three learning mode on student’ cognitive achivement in ecology and genetics. Journal of research in science teaching, 32, issue 9, pp. 971-994.
Handel, et al. (2013). Assesing metacognitive knowledge: development and evaluation of a test instrument. Journal for educational research online, 5, issue 2, pp. 162-188.
Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving to appear in educational technologi: research and depelopement. [online] Tersedia di http://www.coe.missouri.edu/~jonassen/PSPaper%20 final.pdf (Diakses tanggal 24 Oktober 2015).
Liu, C., & Zhang, T. (2016). Research oriented teaching reform of higher mathematics course in petroleum science. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, 5(4), 31-39.
Molina, Reynier Israel Ramírez, et al. "Liderazgo consiliente como competencia potenciadora del talento neuronal." Opción34.86 (2018): 826-854.
Nusantari, E. (2014). Miskonsepsi dan pentingnya hubungan antar konsep untuk membelajarkan materi genetik pada perkuliahan genetika. Prosiding. Surabaya: Unesa.
Ozsoy, G & A. Ataman. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving archevement. Jurnal elektronik internasional dari pendidikan dasar. 1, issue 2, pp. 68 – 83.
Rompayom, P., Chinda, T., Somson,W. & Precharn, D. (2010). The development of metacognitive inventary to measure students’ metacognitve knowledge related to chemical bonding conseptions. Paper presented at international association for educational assessment (IAEA), April 1-7, 2010.
Sudijono, A. (1997). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. pt. raja grafindo persada: jakarta.
Susantini, E. (2010). Efektivitas perangkat pembelajaran biologi berbasis strategi metakognitif ditinjau dari kemampuan siswa dan kategori sekolah. prosiding seminar nasional pendidikan biologi, FKIP UNS, pp. 380-393.
Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, dkk. (1974). Instructional development for trainingteachers of exceptional children. Washinton DC: national center for improvement educational system.
Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Affl erbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, issue 2, pp. 3–14.
Zohar, Anat. (1999). Teacherso metacognitive knowledge and the instruction of higher order thinking. teaching and teacher education, 15, issue 2, pp. 413 – 429.
