Doctrinas jurídicas estatales de Rusia como categoría científica: dimensión esencial y libre de leyes

  • Evgeny A. Apolsky Rostov Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice.
  • Andrey Yu. Mordovtsev Department of Theory and History of Russian and Foreign Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Rostov Institute (branch), All- Russian State University of Justice.
  • Alexey Yu. Mamychev Vladivostok State University оf Economics аnd Service; Far Eastern Federal University
  • Tatyana V. Mordovtseva. Department of Humanities, Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics.
Palabras clave: doctrina legal, ciencia de la ciencia, Doctrina estatal-legal, Dimensión ontológica

Resumen

El artículo discute las doctrinas legales estatales rusas como una categoría científica con un conjunto de características específicas. Los autores analizan las definiciones de doctrina jurídica, doctrina jurídica ofrecida en el discurso político y jurídico ruso, y sobre esta base, presentan sus propias definiciones de doctrina jurídica y doctrina jurídica estatal. Los resultados de la investigación son de importancia decisiva para la historia de los estudios políticos y jurídicos, la teoría general del derecho y la filosofía del derecho, pero al mismo tiempo, pueden utilizarse en otras áreas de la ciencia jurídica (incluida la rama).

Citas

Apolsky, E., Baranov, P., Mamychev, A., Mordovtsev, A., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2017). Doctrinal and legal developments of the state law institutions in the context of the Russian legal mentality (XIX- early XX centuries). Man in India, 97(23), 105-113.

Apolsky, E.A., & Mordovtsev, A.Yu. (2017). Civil law studies in dissertation research of universities of the Russian Empire [Text]: monograph. - M.: Yurlitinform, - 181 p.

Apolsky, E.A., Mordovtsev, A.Yu., & Israpilov, A.A. (2018). The civil process and Roman law in Russia in the XIX - early XX century: the experience of discursive understanding [Text]: a monograph. - M.: RIOR, - 193 p.

Barihin, A.B. (2010). Great legal encyclopedia. (Series "Professional reference books and encyclopedias". - M.: Book World.

Card, R. (2002). The legal scholar, The Reporter: Newsletter of the Society of Legal Scholars, 25, 5–12.

Chynoweth, P. (2006). The built environment interdiscipline: A theoretical model for decision makers in research and teaching, Proceedings of the International Conference on Building Education and Research (CIB W89 BEAR 2006), 10–13 April 2006, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China.

Civitarese Matteucci, Stefano, (2014). Some Remarks on Methodology in Legal Studies in the Light of the Challenges that Globalization Poses to Legal Doctrine. Revista catalana de dret public, 48,119-133.

Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language Vladimir Dahl. The fourth revised and greatly augmented edition, ed. prof. I.A. Baudouin de Courtenay. V. 1. - SPb.-M., 1912.

Goloskokov, L.V. (2001). Political and legal doctrine as a sociocultural phenomenon: Philosophical analysis: dissertation of the candidate of philosophy sciences. - Stavropol.

Grafsky, V.G. (2010). Comparative history of political and legal ideas and views as a scientific problem. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3, 100-119.

Great Encyclopedia. (1896). Dictionary of publicly available information on all branches of knowledge edited by S.N. Yuzhakov. V. 8. Ed. 4th - SPb., Typ. Lit. “Enlightenment”.

Great Soviet Encyclopedia. (1972). (In 30 volumes). Ch. ed. A.M. Prokhorov. Ed. 3rd - M., "Soviet Encyclopedia", - T. 8. Debtor-Eucalyptus.

History of political and legal doctrines. (1995). Textbook for universities. Under the general editorship of Corresponding Member of the RAS V.S. Nersesyants. - M.

History of political and legal doctrines: textbook / resp. ed. V.V. Lazarev. - 3rd ed., Corr. and add. - M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2016.

History of political and legal studies. (2006). Textbook for universities / Ed. Dr. legal sciences, prof. O.E. Leist. - M.: Publishing house "Zercalo".

Hutchinson, T. (2015). The Doctrinal Method: Incorporating Interdisciplinary Methods in Reforming the Law. Erasmus Law Review, 3.

Komova, N.B. (2012). Monarchical power in the conservative state-legal teachings of Russia XVIII-XX centuries: dissertation of the Dr. of legal sciences. - Rostov-on-Don.

Madaev, E.O. (2012). Doctrine in the legal system of the Russian Federation: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. - Irkutsk.

Marchenko, E.I. (2009). The idea of sovereignty in the state-law teachings of the Russian conservatives of the second half of the XIX - XX centuries: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. - Rostov-on-Don.

Minow, M. (2013). Archetypal Legal Scholarship – A Field Guide. Journal of Legal Education, 63(1), 65-69.

Nesterov, A.V. (2012). On scientific and qualification criteria // Scientific and technical information. Series 1. Organization and methods of information work, 8.

Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. - M.: INFRA-M. - 2009.

Puzikov, R.V. (2003). Legal doctrine in the field of legal regulation: Problems of theory and practice: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. - Tambov.

Smits, J.M. (2015). What is Legal Doctrine? On the Aims and Methods of Legal Dogmatic Research. Maastricht European private law institute working paper, 2015/06.

The history of political and legal doctrines: Domarxist period: Textbook / Ed. O.E. Leist. - M.: Legal Lite., 1991.

Vasilyeva, A.A. (2007). Legal doctrine as a source of law: historical and theoretical issues: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. - Barnaul.

Zozulya, A.A. (2006). Doctrine in modern law: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. - SPb.

Publicado
2019-09-01