Estrategias de censura política cognitiva como efecto de "lo nuevos medios".

  • Sergey P. Potseluev Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science at the Institute of Philosophy and Social & Political Sciences, Southern Federal University (Russia)
  • Mikhail S. Konstantinov Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science at the Institute of Philosophy and Social & Political Sciences, Southern Federal University (Russia)
  • Tat'yana A. Podshibyakina Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science at the Institute of Philosophy and Social & Political Sciences, Southern Federal University (Russia)
Palabras clave: inundación de información, funciones cognitivas básicas, Medialogía, YouScan, Ucrania

Resumen

El propósito del artículo es el desarrollo y prueba de un modelo explicativo de estrategias peculiares a la censura política cognitiva ejemplificada en la campaña electoral presidencial ucraniana 2018-2019. Los autores amplían y generalizan aspectos objetivos y subjetivos de los enfoques disponibles en la literatura científica a las nuevas formas de censura política. En un aspecto, no solo la capacidad de atención por sí sola se considera como un objeto de censura política cognitiva, sino también otras funciones cognitivas de la audiencia de los medios es la capacidad de formarse una opinión coherente sobre los problemas actuales. Al menos tres estrategias cognitivas de censura política identificadas sugirieron de un debilitamiento de las capacidades cognitivas básicas: distracción, falsificación y absurdo. Estas estrategias se consideran en una perspectiva comparativa con la experiencia de las últimas formas de censura política en China y Turquía.

Citas

Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. 282 p.

Afanasyev, A. P. (1972). Excerpts on the history of the censorship policy of the czarist regime in the late 70s and early 80s of the XIX century. Questions of the Soviet history. Digest of articles (In Russ.). Moscow: MSU publishers, 203–223.

Agapova, E. A. (2012). Censorship as a way of mind control: Diachronic aspect. Moscow: Journal of Social and Humanitarian Knowledge (In Russ.). 256 p.

Arendt, H. (1971). Lying in Politics: Reflections on The Pentagon Papers. The New York Review of Book. November, 18.

Arendt, H. (2006). Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin Books. 298 p.

Assange J. (2014b). I am Julian Assange. AMA about my new book, "When Google Met WikiLeaks." Network of Communities "Reddit". https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/2ghp54/i_am_julian_assange_ama_about_my_ new_book_when/ckj9hjd/ (accessed: 23.10.2019).

Assange, J. (2014a). When Google Met WikiLeaks. OR Books. New York, London: OR Books. 223 p.

Bamman, D., O'Connor, B., & Smith, N. (2012). Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media. First Monday, 17(3).

Bell, D. (1974). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. London: Heinemann. — 507 p.

Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Open Road Media. 191 p.

Bourdieu P. 1998. On Television / transl. from the French P. P. Ferguson / New York: New Press, 1998. — 104 p.

Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. (2017). Troops, trolls and troublemakers: A global inventory of organized social media manipulation.

Cheng, Y., & Lee, C. J. (2019). Online crisis communication in a post-truth Chinese society: Evidence from interdisciplinary literature. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101826.

Cohen, N. (2015). Political Correctness: How Censorship Defeats itself. The Spectator. January 28. URL: https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/01/political-correctnes-how-censorship-defeats- itself/ (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Darnton, R. (2014). Censors at work: How states shaped literature. WW Norton & Company. 320 p.

Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Power. Contributions to Critical Discourse Studies. Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan, 308 p.

Everington, K. (2018). China's 'troll factory' targeting Taiwan with disinformation prior to election. Taiwan News. 05 November. URL: https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3568146 (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. Vol. I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books. 169 p.

Gitlin, T. (2001). Media Unlimited. New York: Metropolitan Books. 260 p.

Goryaeva, T. M. (2009). Political censorship in USSR, 1917-1991; 2nd Edition. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 407 p.

Harris, R. J. (2013). A cognitive psychology of mass communication. Routledge. 4th ed. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 475 p.

Hozven, R. (1982). Censura, autocensura y contracensura: Reflexiones acerca de un simposio. Chasqui, 12(1), 68-73.

Kravtsev, S. (2019). Political scientist: Zelensky’s hang-over: Kolomoisky wants millions and millions of drug addicts in Ukraine (In Russ.). News of Ukraine — Replyua.net. — URL: https://replyua.net/news/136519-politolog-poka-zelenskiy-lovit-othodnyak-kolomoyskiy- hochet-chtoby-v-ukraine-byli-esche-milliony-i-milliony-narkomanov.html (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Lippmann, W. (1997). Public Opinion. With a New Introduction by V. Curtis. New Brunswick & London: Transaction Publishers. —427 p.

Lukashova, S., & Sarakhman, E. (2019). Former Studio Kvartal-95 employee disappeared before giving an exclusive interview. Ukrayinska Pravda online newspaper, April, 11: https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2019/04/11/7211958/ (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Müller-Kulmann, T. (2007). Propaganda and censorship in Gulf War I. BoD–Books on Demand.

Nikolaenko, T. (2019). Posted April 3, 2019 (In Ukr.). Tetyana Nikolaenko on Facebook. URL: https://www.facebook.com/t.nikolayenko/posts/3182430251782615 (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Oiwan, L. (2012). Hong Kong: Battle against 50 Cents at Wikipedia. Global Voices. 27 October. URL: https://advox.globalvoices.org/2012/10/27/hong-kong-battle-against-50-cents-at- wikipedia/ (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.

Parsons, T. (2002). The Social System. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. – 575 p.

Podesta, D. (2009). Soft censorship: How governments around the globe use money to manipulate the media. Center for International Media Assistance, National Endowment for Democracy.

Postman, N. (2005). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.

Roberts, M. E. (2014). Fear, Friction, and Flooding: Methods of Online Information Control (Doctoral dissertation).

Roberts, M. E. (2018). Censored: distraction and diversion inside China's Great Firewall. Princeton University Press.

Tufekci, Z. (2016). Twitter Z. Tufekci. Twitter. 14 october. — URL: https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/786990927567024131 (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

Tzu-ti, H. (2019). Taiwan most vulnerable to disinformation attacks: Swedish survey. Taiwan News. 28 September. — URL: https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3786185 (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. 240 p.

Video: Voters publicly accused Zelensky of drug use. (2019). Channel Five online media (5- tv.ru). URL: https://www.5-tv.ru/news/239337/video-izbirateli-publicno-obvinili-zelenskogo- vupotreblenii-narkotikov/ (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Volkova, S., & Jang, J. Y. (2018, April). Misleading or falsification: Inferring deceptive strategies and types in online news and social media. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (pp. 575-583). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

Wilson, J. (2015). Political Correctness Is Censorship. Libertarians. June 20. — URL: https://alibertarianfuture.com/libertarians/political-correctness-is-censorship/ (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Zelensky, V. (2019). Let's go to the debate!!! ZE! KOMANDA on YouTube. April 3, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAgZFPHWwJE (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Zeng, J., Chan, C. H., & Fu, K. W. (2017). How Social Media Construct “Truth” Around Crisis Events: Weibo's Rumor Management Strategies After the 2015 Tianjin Blasts. Policy & Internet, 9(3), 297-320.

‘ELECTIONS 2019’ Marathon. ‘Pryamiy’ Ukrainian information television channel on YouTube. April 1, 2019 — URL: https://youtu.be/4WBdOWnd4I8?t=914 (accessed: 30.09.2019).

Publicado
2020-02-01