Nombramiento y selección de jueces en el Reino Unido, Estados Unidos e Irán y su impacto en la independencia judicial.

Gholamreza Jalali; Seyyed Vahid Lajevardi; Abbas Ali Heidari.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v27i1.1525

Gholamreza Jalali Department of Civil Law, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
Seyyed Vahid Lajevardi Department of Private Law, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
Abbas Ali Heidari. Department of Philosophy and Fundamentals of Law, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v27i1.1525

Palabras clave: nombramiento de jueces, elecciones judiciales, independencia judicial

Resumen

En este artículo, examinaremos los métodos de evaluación y el impacto de esas prácticas en la independencia judicial de los jueces. Esta investigación se ha llevado a cabo en Irán y en dos importantes representantes de la Ley de la Commonwealth. Concluimos, que aunque la elección de los jueces federales en los Estados Unidos es un proceso político, no tiene un impacto negativo en su funcionamiento independiente debido a su aprendizaje permanente. También encontramos que las condiciones que gobiernan la elección de los jueces en la ley iraní debido al hecho de que las personas están buscando alcanzar el puesto y el puesto no lo está buscando, han logrado seguir la relación de empleo y empleo.

Citas

Blume, J., & Eisenberg, T. (1998). Judicial politics, death penalty appeals, and case selection: An empirical study. S. Cal. L. Rev., 72, 465.

Burbank, S. (2002). Politics, privilege and power: the separate role in appointment of federal judge. 86 judicature.

Cheek, K., & Champagne, A. (2000). Money in Texas Supreme Court Elections-1980-1998. Judicature, 84, 20.

Dubois, P. L. (1986). Accountability, independence, and the selection of state judges: The role of popular judicial elections. SW LJ, 40, 31.

Eisvandi, M., Gorji, Y., & Niknejadi, F. (2015). Effectiveness of Emotional Intelligence on Increasing the Psychological Dimension of Quality of Life of Mothers of Educable Mentally Retarded Children in Esfahan in. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(1), 29-31.

Freund, P. (1998). Federal appointment, tenure and independence. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1146-1163.

Gamarra, M., Zurek, E., & San-Juan, H. (2018). Addendum for: A Study of Image Analysis Algorithms for Segmentation, Feature Extraction and Classification of Cells. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(1), 05.

Gehhard, M. (2000). The federal appointment process. Durham, Duke University Press, 76.

George, T. E. (2003). Judicial Independence and the Ambiguity of Article III Protections. Ohio St. LJ, 64, 221.

Geyh, C. G. (2008). Methods of judicial selection & their impact on judicial independence. Daedalus, 137(4), 86-101.

Ginsburg, T. (2009). Judicial appointment and judicial independence. papers series for U.S institute for peace. Paper available at http://sssm.com

Haghshenas, S., Iravani, M. R., & Nasrabadi, H. A. B. (2015). Study of effective factors on job satisfaction of Omid Hospital Staff in Isfahan city. UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 3(1), 15-17.

Khadem, A. (1344). Justice in the UK (second part - Judges). Journal of the Bar Association, Feb. and March, 100.

Kumbhar, M., Bagde, S., Karpe, M., Kadam, V. (2019). HPLC Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Eperisone Hydrochloride from Bulk and Marketed Formulation. International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology, 9 (1), 6-14.

Nurgaliyeva, S., Zeynolla, S., Tulenova, U., Zulkarnayeva, Z., & Yespolova, G. (2018). Features of institutional autonomy of the Kazakhstan’s universities. Opción, 34(85-2), 302-336.

Phillips, T. R. (2003). Keynote Address: Electoral Accountability and Judicial Independence. Ohio St. LJ, 64, 137.

M. Pradeep, R. Abinya S. Sathya Anandhi and S. Soundarya (2017). Dynamic Smart Alert Service for Women Safety System. International Journal of Communication and Computer Technologies, 5 (2), 58-66.

Rehnquist, W. (1996). Remarks of the chief justice, Washington college of law, continental celebration plenary academic panel. the future of the federal courts. (speech).

Rehnquist, W. (2005). Structural foundation of judicial independence. California Law Review, 72.

Rottman, D., & Schotlland, R. (2001). What makes judicial election unique.

Slotnick, E. E. (1988). Federal judicial recruitment and selection research: A review essay. Judicature, 71, 317.

Webster, P. D. (1995). Selection and retention of judges: is there one Best Method. Fla. St. UL Rev., 23, 1.

Wheeler, R. (2005). Judicial independence in united states: current issues and relevant background. Colombia Law Review, 37(5).

Wynn Jr, J. A., & Mazur, E. P. (2003). Judicial diversity: Where independence and accountability meet. Alb. L. Rev., 67, 775.