Appointment and selection of judges in the United Kingdom, America and Iran and its impact on judicial independence.
Abstract
In this article, we will examine the methods of judging and the impact of those practices on the judicial independence of judges. This research has been conducted on Iran and two major representatives of the Commonwealth Law. We conclude that although the choice of federal judges in United States is a political process, it has no negative impact on their independent functioning due to their lifelong learning. We also find that conditions governing the choice of judges in Iranian law due the fact that people are looking to achieve the position and the position is not looking for them, has made it to follow the employment and employment relationship.
References
Blume, J., & Eisenberg, T. (1998). Judicial politics, death penalty appeals, and case selection: An empirical study. S. Cal. L. Rev., 72, 465.
Burbank, S. (2002). Politics, privilege and power: the separate role in appointment of federal judge. 86 judicature.
Cheek, K., & Champagne, A. (2000). Money in Texas Supreme Court Elections-1980-1998. Judicature, 84, 20.
Dubois, P. L. (1986). Accountability, independence, and the selection of state judges: The role of popular judicial elections. SW LJ, 40, 31.
Eisvandi, M., Gorji, Y., & Niknejadi, F. (2015). Effectiveness of Emotional Intelligence on Increasing the Psychological Dimension of Quality of Life of Mothers of Educable Mentally Retarded Children in Esfahan in. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(1), 29-31.
Freund, P. (1998). Federal appointment, tenure and independence. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1146-1163.
Gamarra, M., Zurek, E., & San-Juan, H. (2018). Addendum for: A Study of Image Analysis Algorithms for Segmentation, Feature Extraction and Classification of Cells. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(1), 05.
Gehhard, M. (2000). The federal appointment process. Durham, Duke University Press, 76.
George, T. E. (2003). Judicial Independence and the Ambiguity of Article III Protections. Ohio St. LJ, 64, 221.
Geyh, C. G. (2008). Methods of judicial selection & their impact on judicial independence. Daedalus, 137(4), 86-101.
Ginsburg, T. (2009). Judicial appointment and judicial independence. papers series for U.S institute for peace. Paper available at http://sssm.com
Haghshenas, S., Iravani, M. R., & Nasrabadi, H. A. B. (2015). Study of effective factors on job satisfaction of Omid Hospital Staff in Isfahan city. UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 3(1), 15-17.
Khadem, A. (1344). Justice in the UK (second part - Judges). Journal of the Bar Association, Feb. and March, 100.
Kumbhar, M., Bagde, S., Karpe, M., Kadam, V. (2019). HPLC Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Eperisone Hydrochloride from Bulk and Marketed Formulation. International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology, 9 (1), 6-14.
Nurgaliyeva, S., Zeynolla, S., Tulenova, U., Zulkarnayeva, Z., & Yespolova, G. (2018). Features of institutional autonomy of the Kazakhstan’s universities. Opción, 34(85-2), 302-336.
Phillips, T. R. (2003). Keynote Address: Electoral Accountability and Judicial Independence. Ohio St. LJ, 64, 137.
M. Pradeep, R. Abinya S. Sathya Anandhi and S. Soundarya (2017). Dynamic Smart Alert Service for Women Safety System. International Journal of Communication and Computer Technologies, 5 (2), 58-66.
Rehnquist, W. (1996). Remarks of the chief justice, Washington college of law, continental celebration plenary academic panel. the future of the federal courts. (speech).
Rehnquist, W. (2005). Structural foundation of judicial independence. California Law Review, 72.
Rottman, D., & Schotlland, R. (2001). What makes judicial election unique.
Slotnick, E. E. (1988). Federal judicial recruitment and selection research: A review essay. Judicature, 71, 317.
Webster, P. D. (1995). Selection and retention of judges: is there one Best Method. Fla. St. UL Rev., 23, 1.
Wheeler, R. (2005). Judicial independence in united states: current issues and relevant background. Colombia Law Review, 37(5).
Wynn Jr, J. A., & Mazur, E. P. (2003). Judicial diversity: Where independence and accountability meet. Alb. L. Rev., 67, 775.
