Análisis del atractivo del país para estudiantes extranjeros.

Svetlana Ashmarina; Elena Kandrashina; Yuri Tokarev; Airat Izmailov; Ekaterina Nikulina; Valentina Mantulenko.

doi:10.46377/dilemas.v27i1.1559

Svetlana Ashmarina Applied Management Department; Samara State University of Economics
Elena Kandrashina Applied Management Department, Samara State University of Economics.
Yuri Tokarev Department of Statistics, Samara State University of Economics.
Airat Izmailov Applied Management Department, Samara State University of Economics.
Ekaterina Nikulina Samara State University of Economics.
Valentina Mantulenko. Applied Management Department, Samara State University of Economics.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v27i1.1559

Palabras clave: calidad de la educación, proporción de estudiantes extranjeros, atractivo educativo de los países, análisis comparative, métodos no paramétricos de Estadística

Resumen

La inclusión de la proporción de estudiantes extranjeros en el sistema de calificación que caracteriza la calidad de la educación a nivel de universidades individuales y países enteros puede llevar al hecho de que el aumento de esta calificación se considera como un fin en sí mismo. La existencia de tal problema determina la relevancia del estudio. La investigación se basa en la hipótesis de que la proporción de estudiantes extranjeros es un índice cualitativo de la educación y el nivel de desarrollo del sistema educativo del país en su conjunto. El estudio incluyó datos sobre 39 países incluidos en las bases de datos estadísticos de expertos.

Citas

Aba, D. (2016). Addressing intercultural experience and academic mobility in higher education. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(6), 487-502.

Colucci, E., Davies, H., Korhonen, J., & Gaebel, M. (2012). Mobility: Closing the Gap between Policy and Practice: Outcome Report of the Project “Mapping University Mobility of Staff and Students’’. Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.

De Angelis, I., Mariani, V., & Torrini, R. (2017). New evidence on interregional mobility of students in tertiary education: The case of Italy. Politica Economica, 33(1), 73-96.

Freeman, R.B. (2010). Globalization of scientific and engineering talent: International mobility of students, workers, and ideas and the world economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(5), 393-406.

Grebennikov, V.V., Bukalerova, L.A., Moseikina, M.N., Grudtsina, L. Ym., & Moiseyev, V.O. (2016). Educational migration of international students: Axiological aspect of the educational process. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(7), 2430-2441.

Kelo, M., Teichler, U., & Wächter, B. (Eds.). (2006). EURODATA – Student Mobility in European Higher Education. Bonn: Lemmens.

Komleva, V.V. (2017). Russia in the context of new world trends in internationalization of higher education. Middle Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences, 12(6), 13-34.

Korneva, O.Yu., & Plotnikova, I.V. (2015). Student mobility: Social problems, Sociological Research, 6(374), 111-115.

Nilanders, K., & Cakula, S. (2014). Modelling potential foreign applicant flow: Case of Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, IEEE, (pp. 210-215). Istanbul, Turkey. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826093.

Novozhilova, M.V., & Loshkova, I.G. (2011). Mobility in the framework of international cooperation in education and science. Collection of Scientific Works on the Materials of the International Scientific-Practical Conference, 27(4), 65-66.

Nurgalieva, Zh. E., & Turegeldinov, A.Zh. (2017). International student mobility: An overview. Bulletin of Turan University, 4(76), 240-244.

Racine, N., Villeneuve, P. Y., & Thériault, M. (2003). Attracting foreign students: The case of two universities in Québec. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(3), 241-252.

Rostovtsev, V.M., & Izvekov, V.V. (2015). Student mobility in the context of the competence approach: Hermeneutic aspect. Pedagogical Sciences, 3, 64-65.

Sakhapov, R.L., Absalyamova, S.G., & Absalyamov, T.B. (2016). Virtual mobility as a factor in improving the quality and accessibility of education. Bulletin of I. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University, 3(91), 140-146.

Sakhieva, R.G., Ibatullin, R.R., Biktemirova, M.K., Valeyeva, G.K., Pchelina, O.V., Valeyeva, N.S. …Khairullina, E.R. (2015). The essential, objective and functional characteristics of the students’ academic mobility in higher education. Review of European Studies, 7(3), 335-340. DOI: 10.5539/res.v7n3p335.

Shakirova, A.A. (2017). Principles of students’ academic mobility organization. QUID: Investigación, Ciencia y Tecnología, 1(SI), 882-887.

Tran, Ly T. (2016). Students' academic, intercultural and personal development in globalised education mobility”, In Ng, C.H.C., Fox, R., & Nakano, M. (Eds.), Education in the Asia Pacific Region-Issues Concerns and Prospects, 33, (pp. 95-113). Springer, Dordrecht.

UNESCO (2017). Six ways to ensure higher education leaves no one behind. Policy Paper 30. Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO. Paris: France, Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247862 (accessed 4 March 2019).

Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2016). The future of the process of internationalization of higher education in Europe. International Higher Education, 83, 6-8.

Woodhall, M. (1987). Government policy towards overseas students: An international perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 41(2), 119-125.