Learner-Centered English Language Teaching and Syllabus design: An Analysis of the Secondary School Level ESL Curriculum and Instruction in Punjab, Pakistan.

  • Muhammad Mushtaq Government Imamia College, Sahiwal, Pakistan.
  • Syed Kazim Shah Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Ali Raza Siddique. Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Keywords: language teaching, language learning, learner centered approach, syllabus, culture

Abstract

The aim of this study is to find out the learner centeredness in the course syllabi of English language teaching at secondary level in PTB. The study will also explore the use of socio-cultural elements in the course content of the book of 9th class. For the purpose to evaluate the learner centeredness of the course syllabi at secondary level in PTB, rubrics for determining degree of learner centeredness presented by Cullen and Harris (2009) were adopted and it was evaluated whether the course contents meet the required criteria. It was found that learning rationale, syllabus focus and learning outcomes meets the requirements of learner centeredness while teacher and students’ role, collaboration, outside resources and assessment and evaluation don’t meet the criteria of rubrics.

References

Allen, J. P. B. (1984). General-purpose language teaching: A variable focus approach. ELT Documents, 118, 61-74.

Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. Oxford University Press.

Bell, R. (1983). An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. London: Batsford.

Boylan, M., & Donahue, J. A. (2003). Ethics across the curriculum: A practice-based approach. Lexington Books.

Brown, A.L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Education Research 23: 4–12.

Bruner, J. 1960. The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cobb, P., and E. Yackel. 1996. Constructivism, emergent and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychology 31: 175–90.

Cullen, R., & Harris, M. (2009). Assessing learner‐centredness through course syllabi. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 115-125.

Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath.

Dewey, J. (1938). An as experience. Education.

Duffy, T., and D. Cunningham. 1996. Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, ed. D. Jonassen, 170–98. New York: Scholastic.

Gredler, M. 1997. Learning and instruction: Theory into practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hancock, D., Dyk, P. H., & Jones, K. (2012). Adolescent Involvement in Extracurricular Activities: Influences on Leadership Skills. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1).

Jabeen, F., & Shah, S. K. (2011). The role of culture in ELT: Learners’ attitude towards the teaching of target language culture. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 604-613.

Kelly, K. (2009). Out of control: The new biology of machines, social systems, and the economic world. Hachette UK.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 3(7), 19-39.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.

Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom.

Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition, 18, 77-99.

Longman Group for extracts from Challenges: Student's B o o k (1979) by B. Abbs, C. Candlin, C. Edelhoff, T. Moston, and M. Sexton, and S econ d Language Grammar (1987) by W. Rutherford.

Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schwab, R. L. (1986). Maslach burnout inventory (Vol. 21, pp. 3463-3464). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

McDonough, S. (1981). Psychology in Foreign Language Teaching. London: Allen and Unwin.

Mohan, B. (1986). Language and Content. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Nunan, D., Candlin, C. N., & Widdowson, H. G. (1988). Syllabus design (Vol. 55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oksanen, J., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O’Hara, B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., ... & Wagner, H. (2009). R package version 1.15–3. Community Ecology Package, vegan. http://vegan. r-forge. r-project. org.

Perry, R.P. 1997. Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice. New York: Agathon.

Prawat, R., and R. Floden. 1994. Philosophical perspectives on constructivist view of learning. Educational Psychologist 29, no. 1: 37–48.

Richards, P., & Platt, J. (1985). Weber. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics, 289.

Simpson, D. J., Almager, I. L., Beerwinkle, A. L., Celebi, D., Ferkel, R. C., Holubik, T. E., ... & Tomlinson, T. A. (2011). Toward a Neo-Deweyan Theory of Curriculum Analysis and Development. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5(2), 135-167.

van Ek, J. 1975. Threshold Level English. Oxford: Pergamon.

Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (1987). Aspects of syllabus design. Language syllabuses: State of the art. Singapore: RELC.

Wilkins, D. (1976): Notional Syllabuses. London: Oxford University Press.

Yalden, J. (1984). Syllabus design in general education: options for ELT.CJ Brumfit, CJ(Ed). General English Syllabus Design, 13-21.

Zull, J. 2002. The art of changing the brain: Enriching the practice of teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Published
2019-08-01