Discourse as a means of establishing and maintaining manageability on the internet: theoretical framework.
Abstract
The paper is devoted to analysis of theoretical framework of studying discourse as a means of establishing and maintaining manageability on the internet. Data comes from theoretical literature, such as theory of managed space and the methodology of intersubjective institutionalism. The authors demonstrate modern changes in the analysis manageability from subject-object manageability in cybernetics and subject-subject manageability in the theory of political decision making to new version of subject-object manageability in closed virtual communities. The authors made conclusion that these changes led to an increase in the role of discourse as a means of establishing and maintaining manageability.
References
Atoy I. (1992). Sociology at the turn of the century: G. Simmel in comparison with F. Tennis, M. Weber and E. Durkheim. Modern Western Studies of Sociological Classics: Ref. Sat / Ed. ed. L.V. Girko. Issue 1. Moscow.
Bakhtin M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (eds.) Austin. University of Texas Press, 60–102.
Berger P., Lukman T. (1995). Social Construction of Reality. Moscow.
Bourdieu P. (1994). Social space and symbolic power. Bourdieu P. Beginning. Choses dites. Moscow.
Durkheim E. (1995). Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose. Moscow.
Filippov A. (2002) Sociology of space: general idea and classical problem development. Logos. 2002. № 2.
Fromm E. (1990). Escape from Freedom. Moscow.
Gvishiani D.M. (1970). Organization and management. Sociological analysis of bourgeois theories. Moscow.
Habermas J. (1994). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society: Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.
Haken G. (1980). Synergetic. Moscow.
Kibanov A. Ya., Gunin V.N. (2001) Organization Management: Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow.
Latour. B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory. Oxford University Press
Livingston, S., Risse, M. (2019). The Future Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Humans and Human Rights. Ethics & International Affairs, 33(2), 141-158.
Marcuse G. (1994). One-dimensional man. Moscow.
Martyanov D. S., Martianova N. A. (2019) Communication Strategies of Networked Feminism in Russia, 2019 Communication Strategies in Digital Society Workshop (ComSDS), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 15-17.
Martyanov D., Bykov I. (2017) Ideological Segregation in the Russian Cyberspace: Evidences from St. Petersburg. In: Alexandrov D., Boukhanovsky A., Chugunov A., Kabanov Y., Koltsova O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 745. Springer, Cham. pp. 259-269.
Mysin N.V. (2000). Theory and history of social management: The experience of Russia and foreign countries. St. Petersburg.
Parsons T. (1991). The Social System. London.
Rubtsova, M. V. (2007). Manageability: Sociological theoretical analysis of notions. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 12, 32-38.
Rubtsova, M. V. (2011). Governmentability in interactions of subjects. Traditional and new practices. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2, 46-53.
Schmidt V. (2008) Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science. June 2008.
Schutz. A. (2004). Selected: A world that shines with meaning. Moscow.
Simmel G. (1996) Sociology of space. In: Simmel G. Favorites. In 2 t. T.2. Moscow.
Spencer G. (1898) Foundations of Sociology. T.2. St. Petersburg.
Vasilkova V.V. (1999) Order and chaos in the development of social systems. St. Petersburg.
Volchkova, L. T., Pavenkova, M. V. (2002). Sociology of management. Theoretical principles. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 3, 141-144
Weber M. (1990). Selected Works. Moscow.
