Bilingualism in the modern Karachay-Balkar poetry.
Abstract
The paper studies bilingualism issues in the modern Karachay and Balkar poetry. Tendencies and particularities have been revealed within the poetic discourse. Researches have been conducted on the Russian language poetry that has been created by authors, whose creative maturity occurs during the post-Perestroika period, and by new generation poets who embarked on a creative path at the turn of 21st century. Referring to the Karachay and Balkar poetry, it is necessary to clarify that influenced by interaction of two linguistic cultures, it represents two world-vision realities: the national-specific and cross-cultural, multi-ethnic. National artists bring into their Russian language works elements of domestic mentality, problematics, psychologism, emotionality, previously polished by the best samples of the Karachay and Balkar literature.
References
Ata zhurtnu ynakylap. (2014). A collection of poems of the Karachay-Balkarian diaspora. In the Karachay-Balkar language (compiler Bittirova T.Sh.). Nalchik: KBIGI, 159.
Baituganov I.R. (2016). Atlamla. Steps. Nalchik: PE "Polygraphy", 70
Bakkuev A. I. (2008). Taula tatyu. Enchantment with mountains. Poems. Nalchik: Izd-vo «Jel'brus», 128.
Bayramkulov N. (2012). Ships of memories. Poems and prose. Cherkessk: ICO "Alan Hermitage", 256 .
Bittirova T.Sh. (2014). Creativity of bilingual poets as an indicator of post-Soviet identity. News of the of the KBNS. No 1 (57), 274-278.
Bittirvova T. Sh. The main reason for the emergence of artistic literature in the diaspora. Bulletin KBIGA. No 1 (32). 2017, 106-110.
Bogatyryova S. (2008). Under the sign of eternity. Cherkessk, 343.
Dampilova L. S. (2015). The phenomenon of bilingualism in the modern poetry of the peoples of Siberia. Siberian Journal of Philology. No. 3, 196-202.
Grosjean, F. (1985). The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker-hearer. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 6 (6), 467-477.
Hakuasheva M.A. (2017). National identity: deepening or destruction? Adygskaya literature in the era of globalization. Voprosy literatury. No 1, 233-244.
Kuscheterov А A. (2012). Poetry. Mingi tau. № 1 (191) January - February. Nalchik, 188-192. In Russ.
Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary Pod. Ed. V.N. Yartsevoy. (1990). Institut AN SSSR. Moscow: Sov. Entsiklopedia, 685.
Lotman Yu.M. (1997). Inside the thinking worlds. Man text. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 466.
Mackey, William F. (2000).The Description of Bilingualism. The Bilingualism Reader. Routledge. London & New York, 541.
Pilgun M.A. (2015). Multimedia text: features of functioning and development prospects. Uchenyye zapiski kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya gumanitarnyye nauki. Humanities series. Vol. 157, 197-201.
Poetic line. (2015). New names in poetry. Compiled by R. Rubanov. Moscow: SEIP Foundation, 246.
Sultanov K.K. (2001). National identity and value orientation of literature. Moscow: IMLI, 230.
Vereshchagin E.M. (1970). Psychological and methodological characteristics of bilingualism. Moscow: MGU.
