Modern science in moral dimension.
Abstract
This scientific article attempts to systematically make sense of the state and development of the moral aspects of modern scientific knowledge. To this end, the nature of the ethics of science, its influence on the formation of the ethos of science is first clarified, then moral norms and their role in the formation of professional ethics, value aspects of science, and the scientist’s ethics are studied. On this methodological basis, the relationship between science and scientists is explored using their discoveries in the practical life of people.
References
Agazzi E. (1998). Moral Dimension of Science and Engineering. – М.: The Moscow Philosophical Fund, 1998. — 344p.
Alekseev P. V. (2015). Power. Philosophy. Science. – М.: Prospect, 2015. – 464.
Artemov V.М. (2017). Moral Dimension and Human Potential of Right // The Journal of Russian Philosophical Society. 2017, №3(83). – P.19-23.
Doronina М.V., Taburkin V.I. (2013). Ecology in System-Philosophical Dimension (Monography), - Tyumen: The State Agricultural University of the Northern Zauraliye Press, 2013. – 176p.
Doronina, M V. Semenkova, S.N. Taburkin V.I. (2018). Social and Psychological Aspects of Environmental Consciousness / Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism Quarterly. Volume IX. Issue 3(27)/ Summer 2018/ S. 576-580.
Gavrilyuk, N.P. Kryucheva, Y.V. Semenkova S.N. (2018). Professional Integrity within the Structure of Professional Activity: Psychological and Pedagogical Formation Basis. / Astra Salvensis - review of history and culture, year VI, No. 12, 2018. S. 183-191.
Gumnitsky G.N. (2016). The Fundamentals of Ethics. – Ivanovo: IRHPU (The Ivanov All-Russian Humanitarian Pedagogical University Press), 2016. – 132p.
Guseynov А.А. (2013). Philosophy as Ethical Project// The Journal of Russian Philosophical Society. 2013, №3(67). – P.11-16.
Kruzhanov А.А. (2012). Life of Science. Nothing is Alien, Even Fashion // The Journal of Russian Philosophical Society. 2012, №1(61). – P.53-58.
Lacey H. (2008). Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. – Translated from English into Russian by L. V. Surkova and others; Edited by V. A. Yakovlev. – М.: Logos, 2008. – 359 p.
Semenkova, S.N., Bannykh, S.G., Doronina, M. V. (2009). System grounds of social management theory/ The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) ISSN: 2357-1330. S. 1173-1179.
Su, Y., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 159-188.
Sulistyaningsih, D., Mawarsari, V. D., Hidayah, I., & Dwijanto. (2017). Manipulatives Implementation for Supporting Learning of Mathematics For Prospective Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824 012047.
Taburkin V. I., Doronina М.V. (2013). The Fundamentals of Philosophical Science: The Problems of History and Theory (Learning Guide for Higher Schools). – Tyumen: The State Agricultural University of the Northen Zauraliye Press, 2013. – 348p.
Vernadsky V.I. Philosophical (1988). Thoughts of a Naturalist. – М.: Nauka, 1988. -421p.
Wisneski, J. E., Ozogul, G., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2015). Does teaching presence transfer between MBA teaching environments? A comparative investigation of instructional design practices associated with teaching presence. The Internet and Higher Education.
Zolotukhina Е.V. (2002). Science and Morality // Philosophy for Postgraduates (edited by V. P. Kokhanovsky). – Rostov-on-the Don: The “Phenix” Publishing, 2002. – P.417-431.
